Jump to content

98 Gmc Sierra, P0452 Code


Recommended Posts

Posted

I have a 1998 GMC Sierra, 1500, 4wd, 5.7L V8. About 6 months ago, i had the code P0452 come up. The engine has 168,000 miles on it, and so i had replaced the gas cap thinking this could be the problem if it was the original cap. Since then, the light had gone off and never came back on. Now, i have the code back. I don't think its the cap, being as its only about 6 months old. Any ideas on what else could be causing this code to come on?

Posted

It indicates a low voltage problem in the Fuel Tank Pressure Sensor. What the fuel FTP sensor does is convert fuel tank absolute pressure into electrical signals and inputs the signal to the computer.

 

First thing to do is make sure the gas cap is good and tightened properly. Then check the vacuum lines and wiring at the FTPS (Location-Fuel Tank) to be sure they are good, clean and tight.

 

Barring a wiring problem it can be a bad FTPS or PCM.

  • 3 months later...
Posted

I just resolved (I hope) a couple EVAP codes on a 2002 GMC Sierra 1500 4.8L 4x4 and thought my findings may help someone else here someday. The codes that I was getting were P0452, P0453, & P0446. Over the last couple weeks, I've cleared the codes 3 or 4 times. Immediately after clearing the codes, either P0453 or P0452 would come back up as pending, then set the MIL after 2 consecutive engine starts. If I drove the truck a day or 2 without resetting the single code, then the others would usually eventually pop up. I figured it was 2 separate issues with the EVAP system, since P0452 (Low) & P0453 (High) refer to the fuel tank pressure sensor, while P0446 refers to the vent valve.

 

I started out troubleshooting the P0452 & P0453 codes. The fuel tank pressure sensor is located on top of the fuel pump, which is in the top of the tank. The wiring connector connecting it to the PCM contains 3 wires (grey, black, green). I was able to unplug the connector without lowering the tank, so the first thing I did was check the voltage on grey wire. With the key on, engine off, there should be +5v on it. That was what I had, so all good there. Next I checked the black wire, which is ground, by ohming it out to the rail. All was good there, so I knew I had a good ground. Next I checked for a short between any of the wires with it unplugged. I didn't find a short. So I plugged it back up, crawled under the truck, reached over the top of the tank from the inside and pulled the wiring harness down a little so I could get at it to probe the wires. There are 2 grey wires in the harness, the smaller diameter one is the one to the sensor. I again checked the voltage on the grey wire and found 5v. So I took the gas cap off and checked the voltage on the green wire. With the cap off (no pressure & no vacuum), there should be approximately 1.5v on the green wire. I had 1.49v, so close enough. Next I put the cap back on and started the cold engine. When the engine is cold, the PCM runs a test on the EVAP system shortly after startup. So I got back under the truck and checked the voltage on the green wire. It was still at 1.5v, so I knew the test hadn't run yet. I just lay there with the multimeter connected for a few minutes and watched reading. The information I have says that when the PCM pulls a vacuum on the system for the test, the voltage on the green wire should be about 4.5v with a 14 in-Hg vacuum. After a couple minutes, the voltage on the green wire dropped to 0.06v. I checked it a couple times to ensure I still had a good connection to the multimeter and it stayed at 0.06v. So I checked the MIL and sure enough it was back on. I pulled the code and had P0452 (low). At this point, I figured the sensor was bad, especially since sometimes it would set P0453 first, others P0452. So I dropped the tank and replaced the sensor.

 

I also took out the vent valve and blew it out with air. There was a little dust in it, but not much. The valve also seemed the open and close fine. But I decided to spray it inside it with throttle body cleaner, just to be sure it was clean. Once it dried it, I connected it to the battery (white wire is ground, pink wire is 12v) and it closed off fine. I decided not to replace it with the updated version, since it's not that big a deal to get it out and the truck never sees anything other than pavement except for a gravel driveway. Hopefully, the cleaning cured intermediate the P0446 code.

 

Anyway, total repair took about 4 hours, including the time to clean up afterwards. The codes have not come back, where they were setting immediately after clearing them, so hopefully it's fixed. I could have saved a good bit of time if I would have had a scanner that could read the voltage and vacuum readings from the EVAP system. Unfortunately, my Actron 9180 which does read live data, could not see that data.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,760
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    MASONV88888888
    Newest Member
    MASONV88888888
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 1,671 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I’m definitely interested to hear the end result here. 
    • My 2025 Silverado 1500 had to receive a brand-new engine (long block) under warranty last month at only around 16,500 miles. Before the replacement, the truck repeatedly displayed "Engine Oil Level Low" warnings, even though the Oil Life Monitor still showed around 50% remaining after about 6,000 miles since my last oil change. After seeing the warning several times, I checked the dipstick with the engine cold, and the oil level was completely normal. The next day, the message escalated to "Add Engine Oil." At first, I assumed it was just a faulty oil level sensor, so I brought the truck to the dealership. After inspecting the engine, they found internal cylinder wall scoring and ultimately replaced the entire long block under warranty. Before this happened, I was planning to install a 4-inch lift and suspension upgrade on my truck. After needing a new engine at just 16,500 miles, I honestly don't see the point anymore. I also contacted GM to ask whether my vehicle qualified for a buyback, but I was informed that it does not at this time. Anyway, this experience has left me with serious concerns about the long-term reliability of this engine. I sincerely hope NHTSA expands the current investigation or recall to include 2025 model and performs a thorough inspection of affected vehicles. My biggest concern is that these engines may fail shortly after the powertrain warranty expires. If GM truly stands behind this engine, then at the very least, please consider extending the powertrain warranty to 10 years for affected owners. That would go a long way toward restoring customer confidence.
    • Without exception but then I'm the odd duck, right? I know what goes into that test, how it is calculated and thus how to beat it. But EPA values are often not beaten by the general public and the government has in past years adjusted the means and methods to come to those values to more closely approximate "Joe Average".    The only real trick to beating that EPA average is don't drive like "Joe Average".    It's the same method you used to profit from "Economic Migration" and in doing so beat the 'stats'. But you, like me, are not "Joe Average".     The thing you don't seem to grasp is this "Purchasing Power Index" isn't forward looking. It doesn't predict what it going to be but looks backward and states what it was. They are not telling us what the THINK, they are telling us what they MEASURED. Example:    Wife says "I'm going to lose 40 pounds by Christmas". May she does, maybe she doesn't but the doctors office who weighed her when she made that statement and again at Christmas only REPORTS what the RESULT was. You and I can banter about what was possible and what aunt Tilly did till the cows come home but the result is the result. Arguing otherwise is.....irrational. That's all I'm saying. This isn't about:      What you are calling a 'Statistic' is a RESULT not a CALCUATION and as a result the RULE. Like gravity as a rule, it can not be broken. 
    • Just wanted to say thank you for posting this. Years later, your thread is still helping Silverado owners.   I bought my 2025 Silverado 1500 in January 2025, and I've had what feels like the exact same rattle since day one. After reading your findings, I believe my truck has the same issue with the cable carrier contacting the rear sliding window. To be honest, I had pretty much given up on pursuing the issue. It wasn't until I recently drove another brand's pickup that I realized just how quiet their cabin was—and how noisy mine has been all along. On my truck, the rattle happens on almost any paved road, gets even worse on rougher pavement, and I can even hear it during braking and acceleration.   I actually referenced your thread when submitting my case to GM, hoping they'll recognize this as a recurring issue instead of treating it as an isolated incident. The reason I reached out to GM first is because my dealership told me they would need to keep the truck for at least two days just to diagnose the problem. I was concerned that even after two days, they still might not be able to identify the source of the rattle before giving the truck back to me. I had also asked a few dealerships about this issue during previous service visits, but none of them seemed to know what was causing it or had a solution. That's why I decided to contact GM directly first, hoping they might already have an official repair procedure or guidance for this issue.   I also hope GM eventually comes up with an official fix for this problem. I have a feeling there are many Silverado owners experiencing the same rattle, but most either choose to live with it or simply don't know what the cause is.   Really appreciate you taking the time to document your diagnosis. Your post is still making a difference years later.
    • I have 2 choices. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...