Jump to content

Detail Fun


Recommended Posts

Posted

I finally got some down time to detail the Silverado, the outside anyway. I am a new Adams Premium Car Care Products follower. I love his stuff. It is very high quality, very easy to use, the customer service is outstanding, and the shine is out of this world. I did a 3 step process on it in about 2.5 hours the other night. Even the stuff on the tires is Adams. If you havent used any, and get an opportunity, you should, you will convert.

 

This is my arsenal, the pads look dirty, b/c this is after I used them. The process is color coded. The liquid you use for each pad, matches the color of the pad. I use them all with my Meguiars DA.

DSC_0231.jpg

Also, these pictures were taken in midday sun, but its all the time I had, so I went for it.

 

DSC_0221.jpg

DSC_0223.jpg

DSC_0224.jpg

DSC_0227.jpg

DSC_0232.jpg

DSC_0226.jpg

DSC_0229.jpg

 

*edit* The little dark spots are on my lens I guess, they arent on the truck.

Posted

I am with you on the adam's products. I just picked up a buffer and hope to try it out this week but have hand applied products from them in the past. The results are outstanding. Here is a couple pix of my old ride after a detail. I am sure the Sierra will look just as good.

post-67623-1278431380_thumb.jpg

post-67623-1278431401_thumb.jpg

post-67623-1278431418_thumb.jpg

post-67623-1278431380_thumb.jpg

post-67623-1278431401_thumb.jpg

post-67623-1278431418_thumb.jpg

post-67623-1278431380_thumb.jpg

post-67623-1278431401_thumb.jpg

post-67623-1278431418_thumb.jpg

post-67623-1278431380_thumb.jpg

post-67623-1278431401_thumb.jpg

post-67623-1278431418_thumb.jpg

Posted

Thats one nice Silverado you got there. That Titan was nice too. If GM wasn't around to buy trucks from the Titan would be my next choice.

Posted

I thought about that the other day lol

Thats one nice Silverado you got there. That Titan was nice too. If GM wasn't around to buy trucks from the Titan would be my next choice.
Posted

Nice work on the SSS!

 

Guys, just beware of the folks who shill Adam's polishes just like those who shill for Zaino on a lot of boards. You can get just as good (if not better in some cases) results from a lot of other products. Mother's, Meguiar's, 3M, Poorboys, et. al. all make quality product lines.

 

Actually, for those who may not be aware, Zaino is actually just a private label version of Duragloss, and Adam's is a private label version of Chemical Guys.

 

It's not about what brand of products you use, it's about proper technique and persistent maintenance.

Posted

There is truth to that no doubt. I have a cupboard full of different stuff. I have used and continue to use everthing from Mothers to Turtle wax. For a full out detail I really like the Adam's stuff. Regardless of who makes them, the stuff is very user friendly, durable, and offers great results. I didn't mean to "pimp" any particular product. Just offering an opinion based on my own experience with this one. I will always have their products on hand even if I am paying a bit more than I have to.

Posted
Nice work on the SSS!

 

Guys, just beware of the folks who shill Adam's polishes just like those who shill for Zaino on a lot of boards. You can get just as good (if not better in some cases) results from a lot of other products. Mother's, Meguiar's, 3M, Poorboys, et. al. all make quality product lines.

 

Actually, for those who may not be aware, Zaino is actually just a private label version of Duragloss, and Adam's is a private label version of Chemical Guys.

 

It's not about what brand of products you use, it's about proper technique and persistent maintenance.

 

The more I think about it the more offended I am by your inference. Couldn't any person posting an opinion of any product be accused of "Shilling".

 

1. a person who poses as a customer in order to decoy others into participating, as at a gambling house, auction, confidence game, etc.

2.a person who publicizes or praises something or someone for reasons of self-interest, personal profit, or friendship or loyalty.

 

 

I don't work for Adam's, profit from any sale, have no self-interest, and any loyalty I may feel is based on my experience with the product. Don't most folks have a sense of loyalty to products that work for them. I also like Coke over Pepsi. I don't work for them either.

Posted
The more I think about it the more offended I am by your inference. Couldn't any person posting an opinion of any product be accused of "Shilling".

 

:lol:

 

Don't get your panties all in a bunch. The point I was making was that instead of people being so focused on the brand of product/products used for a detail, the real focus should be on technique used to produce a result.

 

As a veteran professional detailer I always tell people that it really doesn't matter what products I am given to work with, I will be able to pull off a high quality result simply because I know how to work with various types of tools, pads, and abrasives properly and effectively. Do some products make certain jobs easier to do? Absolutely. Doesn't mean the job can't be done with something else though.

 

The reason I made the comment I did was not to bash anyone or accuse anyone specifically of shilling in this post, but rather to make the point that the thread starter's result was good not because of the products he used, but because obviously he knows how to use the products properly/effectively. THAT is really the direction the discussion should be going, as opposed to a product brand discussion.

 

Sadly, the current American consumer culture is heavily brand-driven, and that sometimes detracts from the important "meat and potatoes" aspects of purchasing and using any product. On several of the detailing forums I participate in, there is a saying that goes "Find something you like and use it often." In other words, it really doesn't matter what you're using if you're using it as intended and getting good results on a consistent basis. The other popular phrase we use is "Each one teach one." That isn't meant to say "teach people which products are best," it means "teach people the right way to use the products they have or choose to use."

 

Capiche?

Posted

Although not an expert like yourself I have found some products work better than others. Specifically, qualities like ease of application, durability, and gloss can and do vary quite a bit. You are correct to point out technique is a vital step to the application of any product. You are also correct to point out there are a number of good waxes, polishes, and detailing products out there worth considering. You are wrong to use terminology that suggest posters who offer opinions on specific products are being anything other than honest. Perhaps you should have focused more on the intent of you post and less on accusations directed toward people you know nothing about. JMHO

Posted

Speaking of detailing, I just spent the whole day clay barring my mom's Mustang which is a 2004 model. Seeing my mom is not a person who really cares about detailing, but at least washes her car and vacuums the inside, I must say that the clay bar works wonders on cars that havent had it done in a while or never. I wish I would have taken a before and after shot, but regardless of whether you wax or not, the damn bar was able to bring back the smoothness and shine the paint and clear cloat originally shows. My mom was so impressed with it, she wanted me to do my sisters car which I know definitly needs it. As for wax, Turtle wax always worked for me.

Posted

Well, not quite the thread I expected, but thanks for the few compliments I got. As far as the conversation about products and techniques, I won't go there unless someone wants to start a detail thread, or section, then I'll be all over it. I've got plenty of stories and experience with all kinds of techniques and products. With pictures.....

Posted
Well, not quite the thread I expected, but thanks for the few compliments I got. As far as the conversation about products and techniques, I won't go there unless someone wants to start a detail thread, or section, then I'll be all over it. I've got plenty of stories and experience with all kinds of techniques and products. With pictures.....

 

Product reviews??????? In a truck forum??????? What a concept!!!!! Regardless of where this thread has gone (my fault as much as anything :uhoh: ) does not mean it can not once again head in the direction you intended. I would love to see more pics or hear opinions on products you or anyone have tried. You do seem to have a well equipped detail kit. Let's hear about the techniques you employed and how they could help the "everyday" man.

Posted
Although not an expert like yourself I have found some products work better than others. Specifically, qualities like ease of application, durability, and gloss can and do vary quite a bit. You are correct to point out technique is a vital step to the application of any product. You are also correct to point out there are a number of good waxes, polishes, and detailing products out there worth considering.

 

I'm not denying that some products work better than others in certain situations. I'm just saying that there's a positive way of presenting those facts/opinions and a way that comes across not so innocently (even if you ultimately had innocent intentions).

 

You are wrong to use terminology that suggest posters who offer opinions on specific products are being anything other than honest. Perhaps you should have focused more on the intent of you post and less on accusations directed toward people you know nothing about. JMHO

 

Again, I have been around the detailing world and online car communities for many years and any time I read something like:

 

"I am a new Adams Premium Car Care Products follower. I love his stuff. It is very high quality, very easy to use, the customer service is outstanding, and the shine is out of this world. I did a 3 step process on it in about 2.5 hours the other night. Even the stuff on the tires is Adams. If you havent used any, and get an opportunity, you should, you will convert."

 

I tend to look at that as shilling, or at the very least promotion of a product that goes beyond normal objective evaluation. The whole statement just comes across like something written by the marketing department (even if in truth it isn't). I've seen enough shills over the years to recognize their tactics in use, even if unintentionally.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,791
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    d.lowrey
    Newest Member
    d.lowrey
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 5,172 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Just did an injector/HPFP replacement on Pepper at 192,400 miles; close enough to 200K, RIGHT? (If 200K is considered life end and to me it isn't). But hey, to each his own.    Have never run a catch can on this vehicle. Back side of every valve looked like a new valve spray painted semigloss black. Port walls looked 'neat' (all a normal result of passive EGR via VVT) Zero build up even in AFM cylinders. Just color. It uses no measurable oil and never has.    At 155,000 I put her on E-85 and a borescope of the cylinders at plug change showed very clean pistons and valve faces. The replaced injector tips looked new. (It was the pump piston seal that was leaking). Oh well, have six good backups.    Still gets 28 mpg on gas (highway average) and over 20 (highway) on alky. UOA's look good and runs as good now as it did when I bought it. Better in fact.    What improvement would a Catch Can provide this motor?     And given all this I expect that IF I installed one I'd see some water/gas/oil vapor accumulation. Byproducts of normal combustion.   Having said that, IF my motor used an appreciable amount of oil I'd consider it a useful 'crutch' until I had the situation corrected OR if bore polished, until I junked it or rebuilt it to stave off repeated plug fouling.    I'm not telling you what I THINK. But what its DONE.          
    • Love the look. I'm a SCSB lover myself.    Two items. 1.) A spacer changes scrub radius but this also changes when we use wheels of different offsets. A little isn't a big deal. 2.) Steel wheels, alloy wheels all have different thickness. Same effect on the stud and lug nut as a spacer. When hub centric the wheel isn't supported by the stud. It's supported by the hub. The stud just keeps it all together.  
    • I had a evap sol go bad a couple weeks ago. . I replaced it.  While watching live data at the time I saw I had some cylinder 1 misfires. No MIL but on live data I could see ~50 at startup and about 70 more after an hour a drive all on cyl 1.  I also noticed that the LTFT were -5% to -15% always.  And that bank 2 is always -3% richer than bank 1. Even across all driving modes, city, highway, etc it’s always 3% richer than bank 1. So I start with the misfire. Swapped coil, plug, and plug wires from 1 to 3. No follow. I got an Injector reseal kit, pulled the D/s injector rail, swapped #1 and #3 injectors, resealed them, reinstalled and retested.  The misfire followed to 3. So I ordered and replaced all 8 injectors, spark plugs, and plug wires. Also replaced the 1 time use fuel pipes under the intake manifold.  Injectors that were in the truck since new were  Part # 12668390.  I replaced them with # 12742701 Got from RockAuto. Pretty certain they’re genuine and the correct ones. I called a friend at a parts store who told me “the 12742701 were the correct superseded part # for the originals I was replacing”. So started truck after replacing all that and it’s running -15 - -30 LTFTs. I reset the fuel trims with GDS2 and drove it for a 60 miles trip each way. There have been no changes in the LTFTs.  I checked if the HPFP was leaking into the crankcase. I removed the pvc and watched the trims. No difference.  I checked the alcohol content and it was at 10%  I’m out of ideas here. Truck seems to run great. Just always rich on the fuel trims.  Anyone with any help or ideas would be greatly appreciated.  I ran an injector balance test just for the heck of it and it came back this. I’m confused.  I have gds2 and some other diag tools if anyone knows of anything I should test next.
    • Definitely needs to go back to the dealer. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...