Jump to content

2011 Durango First Drive


P71_CrownVic

Recommended Posts

Posted

Again...this thing is STUNNING. Great to see...:

 

* ABT

* AC Schnitzer

* Acura

* Alfa Romeo

* Alpina

* Artega

* Ascari

* Aston Martin

* Audi

* BMW

* Bentley

* Brabus

* Breckland

* Bugatti

* Buick

* Cadillac

* Caparo

* Carlsson

* Caterham

* Chevrolet

* Chrysler

* Citroen

* Covini

* Dacia

* Daewoo

* Daihatsu

* Daimler

* Devon

* Dodge

* Donkervoort

* EDAG

* Edo

* Elfin

* FM Auto

* FPV

* Farbio

* Ferrari

* Fiat

* Fisker

* Ford

* GM

* GMC

* Gordon Murray

* Gumpert

* HSV

* Hamann

* Holden

* Honda

* Hummer

* Hyundai

* Infiniti

* Isuzu

* Italdesign

* Iveco

* Jaguar

* Jeep

* KTM

* Kia

* Kleemann

* Koenigsegg

* LCC

* Lada

* Lamborghini

* Lancia

* Land Rover

* Leblanc

* Lexus

* Lincoln

* Lobini

* Loremo

* Lotus

* MG

* Mansory

* Marcos

* Maserati

* Maybach

* Mazda

* Mazel

* McLaren

* Mercedes-Benz

* Mercury

* Mindset

* Mini

* Mitsubishi

* Mitsuoka

* Morgan

* Nismo

* Nissan

* Noble

* ORCA

* Oldsmobile

* Opel

* PGO

* Pagani

* Panoz

* Peugeot

* Pininfarina

* Plymouth

* Pontiac

* Porsche

* Proton

* Renault

* Rinspeed

* Rolls-Royce

* Rover

* Saab

* Saleen

* Saturn

* Scion

* Seat

* Skoda

* Smart

* Spyker

* SsangYong

* Startech

* Stola

* Strosek

* StudioTorino

* Subaru

* Suzuki

* TVR

* TechArt

* Tesla

* Think

* Toyota

* Tramontana

* Valmet

* Vauxhall

* Venturi

* Volkswagen

* Volvo

* Wald

* Wiesmann

* Yes

* Zagato

* Zenvo

 

...hitting on all 8 lately.

 

lead1-2011-dodge-durango-first-drive.jpg

 

Inside, the changes are more pronounced. Tired of taking heat for kid-friendly all-plastic interiors (pre-2011 Grand Caravan and Journey), Dodge stylists upped their interior design goals to eclipse even their own well-regarded Ram 1500. The change is dramatic. While not the equal of industry leaders like Audi, the 2011 Durango features large swaths of seamless soft-touch trim panels and cushy surfaces everywhere you're likely to lay a finger.

 

When the hell was the last time a Chrysler interior was mentioned in the same sentence as an Audi?

 

LINK

 

EDIT: I had to add a few more manufactures to my list of companies I think are hitting on all 8. God forbid I leave anyone out.

Posted

I agree it looks pretty sharp, also nice to see a crossover unibody with a V8 still offered too.

 

I suspect once they get that 8 speed auto behind that Hemi, that it might get decent mileage as well. It is stated to be launching with the old 5 speed auto.

 

I noticed the new Durango was rated something like 13/20 or 14/20. Having had pretty much that same powertrain in a AWD LTD Comander. I have to think its going to average closer to the 13 to 14 numbers untill they get that 8 speed in there .

 

I normally only averaged 11city15hwy with that 06' Commander LTD AWD Hemi with the same 5 speed auto they are going to launch this Durango with.

 

I swapped over to an 07 Suburban Z71 4x4 that got about 20-30% better mileage and had a whole lot more room.

 

I always thought it had something to do with the AWD vs part time 4wd, so I have to say that is one thing I sure wish they would have done on the this durango, and gone with a part time 4wd like the Tahoe/Suburbans. Most people know how to push a 4x4 button or if they don't they can leave it in auto 4x4 for the winter like you can on a Tahoe/Suburban.

Posted
Again...this thing is STUNNING. Great to see GM and Chrysler hitting on all 8 lately.

 

lead1-2011-dodge-durango-first-drive.jpg

 

I believe it's the same thing as the Jeep, so I don't see much exciting about it. :P I actually think the jeep looks better.

2011-jeep-grand-cherokee.jpg

Posted
I believe it's the same thing as the Jeep, so I don't see much exciting about it. :P I actually think the jeep looks better.

 

The Durango is 10" longer...5" longer in the wheelbase...and there's this:

 

"While the Dodge and the Jeep were developed together and share much of the same body structure forward of the C-pillar, their characters are much different. At every major juncture, engineers took the Jeep in the direction that maximized off-road capabilities. We optimized the Dodge for the street and meeting the demands of today's SUV buyer," said Dolan. And what does that buyer want? They want the capabilities of a truck-based SUV in terms of towing and cargo hauling in a package that delivers the car-like driving capabilities of a modern crossover.
Posted
I believe it's the same thing as the Jeep, so I don't see much exciting about it. :P I actually think the jeep looks better.

 

The Durango is 10" longer...5" longer in the wheelbase...and there's this:

 

"While the Dodge and the Jeep were developed together and share much of the same body structure forward of the C-pillar, their characters are much different. At every major juncture, engineers took the Jeep in the direction that maximized off-road capabilities. We optimized the Dodge for the street and meeting the demands of today's SUV buyer," said Dolan. And what does that buyer want? They want the capabilities of a truck-based SUV in terms of towing and cargo hauling in a package that delivers the car-like driving capabilities of a modern crossover.

 

 

Cool, didn't know that. From the photos, they obviously look similar.

Posted
I believe it's the same thing as the Jeep, so I don't see much exciting about it. :P I actually think the jeep looks better.

 

The Durango is 10" longer...5" longer in the wheelbase...and there's this:

 

"While the Dodge and the Jeep were developed together and share much of the same body structure forward of the C-pillar, their characters are much different. At every major juncture, engineers took the Jeep in the direction that maximized off-road capabilities. We optimized the Dodge for the street and meeting the demands of today's SUV buyer," said Dolan. And what does that buyer want? They want the capabilities of a truck-based SUV in terms of towing and cargo hauling in a package that delivers the car-like driving capabilities of a modern crossover.

 

 

Cool, didn't know that. From the photos, they obviously look similar.

 

 

They do...they share a lot of design ques...but where the Jeep looks somewhat soft and gentle...the Durango looks like it snacks on school children.....at least in black.

 

This, however, is disgusting:

 

39-2011-dodge-durango-first-drive.jpg

 

Stupid, green hippies.

Posted
I believe it's the same thing as the Jeep, so I don't see much exciting about it. :P I actually think the jeep looks better.

 

The Durango is 10" longer...5" longer in the wheelbase...and there's this:

 

"While the Dodge and the Jeep were developed together and share much of the same body structure forward of the C-pillar, their characters are much different. At every major juncture, engineers took the Jeep in the direction that maximized off-road capabilities. We optimized the Dodge for the street and meeting the demands of today's SUV buyer," said Dolan. And what does that buyer want? They want the capabilities of a truck-based SUV in terms of towing and cargo hauling in a package that delivers the car-like driving capabilities of a modern crossover.

 

 

Cool, didn't know that. From the photos, they obviously look similar.

 

 

They do...they share a lot of design ques...but where the Jeep looks somewhat soft and gentle...the Durango looks like it snacks on school children.....at least in black.

 

This, however, is disgusting:

 

39-2011-dodge-durango-first-drive.jpg

 

Stupid, green hippies.

 

 

if I were to have a 2011 durango, the Needle would go into the green stripe, through the green stripe, out of the green stripe and towards the Red Stripe!

Posted
The Grand Cherokee is a re-badged Durango. At least the Durango looks better than the Grand Cherokee and 10 times better then the body style it replaces.

 

the 2004-2009 Durango Sucked BALLS compared to the 1st Gen Durango and the new Durango. the 2nd gen durango sucked SO BAD, there WAS NO 2010 Model.

Posted
The Grand Cherokee is a re-badged Durango. At least the Durango looks better than the Grand Cherokee and 10 times better then the body style it replaces.

 

Not it's not...not even close.

 

The Durango is 10" longer overall, 5" longer in the wheel base. Then there's this:

 

"While the Dodge and the Jeep were developed together and share much of the same body structure forward of the C-pillar, their characters are much different. At every major juncture, engineers took the Jeep in the direction that maximized off-road capabilities. We optimized the Dodge for the street and meeting the demands of today's SUV buyer," said Dolan. And what does that buyer want? They want the capabilities of a truck-based SUV in terms of towing and cargo hauling in a package that delivers the car-like driving capabilities of a modern crossover.
Posted

To me the new grand looks really chopped off at the back. I think the Durango looks much more balanced in its overall proportional design. The Body lines of the new Durango seem to be more in line with the original durango design rather then the last couple snub nosed angular minivan looking designs. I think this new one will likley sell well for them. But I think they need to get a move on with putting that new 8 speed auto behind that Hemi, I know that is pretty much the only way I would be interested in buying one.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Thanks for all that information, I might purchase one and see if it will work for me, if not they may let me return it! Yes for sure the tires are definitely within limit for my truck empty, and when I do tow I'll definitely make sure to raise the rear psi for the amount of weight that's going to be on it.
    • Yes exactly, more and more these days people/companies are afraid of liability issues so its easier just to say no rather than risk putting their neck on the line.    I will say with the Autel unit or when I used it last year on my truck, it wasn't like I could choose the 2025 model year or even the 2024 model year as that option was not there to manipulate the placard pressures but had to go back to 2023 or there abouts and then it showed up as an option, odd but that was how the software was then and I can't say one way or the other now as they throw out updates every so often. I still would talk to your tire dealer though to start with and they may do it for nothing but also they may have a comment on a better unit to purchase. All I know is that one of the large tire shops in my area happens to use these Autel units for their use and set them up to use the wifi and all of that jazz for constant updating because each tire tech has one handed to them by the shop but I just plugged it into my laptop to update it and yes if one is bought it has to be registered so you can get the link to do updates and then the unit has to be updated before its even used. I am not at all techy so it took me a bit but anyway just a heads up for anything you buy, most likely it will need to be connected to a computer to access the internet to have it updated to the latest software version before you can put it to use.   If your truck is near empty, those tire pressures you listed are a very safe upper range pressures to carry the weight, both the front and rear as I know they could be run lower yet with an empty truck. And if its a trailer and not some motorcycle your going to strap onto the front of your truck on a rack, you shouldn't have a need to inflate your front tires if your at 55 front already, its the rear ones that would need more air if you have much hitch weight. 
    • Thank you, I'll check that Autel scanner out and see if it will work for me! Ya I can see GM's point of view if they lower the psi set value for someone and the person sell's the truck and the new owner puts the factory tires back on then their could be liability issues cause the psi warning light wasn't coming on when the tires were under inflated for towing their load and then it might be able to be traced back to GM lowering it.
    • I had a similar but different response when I talked to the service manager where I bought my truck in that he said GM corporate won't allow them to lower the placard pressure setting as they would get their hand slapped but that of course they have the ability to make that change. His suggestion was simply go to a tire dealer or third party shop that is willing to reset the pressures lower. However I chose to buy a tpms tool and partly based off of this very forum as it had been proven to work on the 2024 model ( Global B system ) and while I could have paid lots for a full two way diag tool, I didn't want to spend that much and bought the recommended Autel TS 508 and it will reprogram the 2025 model and assume it should do the 2026 as well. However the tool is rather proprietary to reprogramming Autel tpms sensors so that is a function I will never use, where as a real two way scanner would have many uses but also have yearly subscriptions etc where this 508 is free updates for as long as they put updates out for the unit. In any event it worked to lower the placard pressures and I often use it to adjust my actual tire pressures although will check with a mechanical gauge as well sometimes just to make sure that tires tpms sensor isn't lying to me.    My suggestion is either buy a tool that you know will work to adjust the system or start out by getting the tire shop you bought your tires from to reset your truck and if after that you still want a unit to do it yourself, get one at that point. 
    • Here is an image of a quick Google search about these tires on my truck and it's exactly same psi recommendation the Toyo tires company gave me!    I'm not looking for anyone else recommended psi or anything, I'm just looking to see if anyone knew a way to get rid of the factory low psi warning light, because I'm not running high psi and ruining my tires when I'm not towing! 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...