Jump to content

T-56 six speed


Recommended Posts

Posted

Hey guys. I currently am in the process of buildind a 454 for my 1961 apache 10 stepside. My question is will a t-56 tranny stand up to the torque of this engine? and are there any special things needed to adapt the six speed to the block? My curent plan includes getting a lakewood bellhousing for 58-80 chevy v8, a Hays aluminum 168 tooth flywheel with an 11 inch centerforce dual friction clutch. I just wanted to make sure these parts will work together before I order them. Thanks

 

Alex

Posted

If memory serves me correct, the T-56 is rated at 450lbs-ft of input shaft torque.  How realible that number is, is simply a guesstimation.

 

The T-56 used in the F-body is virtually the same T-56 used in the V-10 Viper.  The shifter mount is in a different location and I think they do some updrages to the synchro's but otherwise they are the same.  So if it handles the Viper's torque and so far mine has lasted, I don't forsee a problem.

 

I will warn you though that the synchro's in them are kinda cheap.  It probably wouldn't hurt having a transmission shop that has experience with these transmissions (as you can't just split it apart and work on it like an old 4 speed) go through, replace and beef up whatever is needed.

 

To give you an idea of how complicated these transmissions are, unless the GM dealer has a certified technician in repairing these, they simply warranty replace the whole trans as it's cheaper to replace them than to work on and repair them.

Posted

Thanks CM. The tranny I am planning on buying is out of a 1995 corvette. I am going to look into having it built up to handle my engine (it should have around 650hp and 600tq). The only thing Im worried about is if it will bolt up to the lakewood bellhousing. I also do not know whether or not it will be worth it to spend the extra money for a aluminum flywheel as apposed to a steel one, I know that aluminum dissapates heat better and its lighter. This truck is being built to drag race and I am not cutting any corners.

 

Alex

Posted

I would definetely look at one from a later Vette or F-body.  The early T-56's (like 93, 94 and possibly 95) weren't as strong as the 96 and 97 LT1 as well as the 98+ LS1 versions if you don't want to beef it up at first.

 

Either way, if you build it, it will be irrelevant. :D

Posted
I think the Viper version has a stronger input shaft.  A friend of mine had his rebuilt several years ago and had a shop go through it.  I can try to get contact info if you are interested.  They do a lot of development work for f-bodies.
Posted

Well the guy wants $1300 for the tranny, but I am seeing al kinds of T-56's on ebay that are 2000's and 2001's for $1200. Im going to look for a newer one like you said. I think I am still going to have it sent out and beefed up because I don't want to take the tranny out all the time because of the way I drive this thing.

 

Alex

Posted

Have you looked on LS1.com and LS1tech.com in the classifieds?  I know I've seen them there and in some cases cheaper.  They may be grenaded units (most likely synchro's), but if you're gonna take it apart, that may not be an issue.

 

I'm not sure of the Viper version may also have more splines in it's input shaft as well as being a beefier unit.

  • 3 months later...
Posted
In my opinion a t-56 is a poor choice for drag racing with 600hp BB. I have trashed 4 of them in my 600hp 2000 camaro ss.If you drive it easy it would last,but 6000rpm clutch dumps at the tree throttle on shifts your living on borrowed time. Synchros and shift forks are their weak points.Viper t-56 would be better choice,built th400 with right convertor would net quicker e.t,s.
Posted
The tranny I am planning on buying is out of a 1995 corvette.

Don't know if I'm too late to add my input on this...

 

But, first off...if the tranny is coming from an '95 Corvette, it is NOT a Borg Warner/Tremec T-56.  The '89-'96 Corvette had the ZF made 6-speed.  A better, although more expensive, unit in my book.  The T-56 shift feel requires more "precision" I suppose than the ZF.  The ZF had a heavier effort, but it felt more solid through the gates. That's the only way I can describe it.  Anyone who has driven an early '90's Corvette and then a new C5 would agree.  That said, the T-56, especially in the one out of the Z06 can handle some serious torque.  And it can be built up to handle even more.

 

I've heard mixed results with the Richmond trannies.  So I'd stay with the course you were already on.

 

Rob

Posted
Don't know if I'm too late to add my input on this...

 

But, first off...if the tranny is coming from an '95 Corvette, it is NOT a Borg Warner/Tremec T-56.  The '89-'96 Corvette had the ZF made 6-speed.  A better, although more expensive, unit in my book.  The T-56 shift feel requires more "precision" I suppose than the ZF.  The ZF had a heavier effort, but it felt more solid through the gates. That's the only way I can describe it.  Anyone who has driven an early '90's Corvette and then a new C5 would agree.  That said, the T-56, especially in the one out of the Z06 can handle some serious torque.  And it can be built up to handle even more.

 

I've heard mixed results with the Richmond trannies.  So I'd stay with the course you were already on.

 

Rob

I was about to bring up the same point about the ZF-6!

 

Great minds think alike :chevy:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,847
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    FiLo
    Newest Member
    FiLo
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 542 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • sorry to bump an old thread, im a bit clueless with this stuff, would these fit a 2019+ Silverado? https://wiperpro.com.au/products/chevrolet-silverado-wiper-blades mainly wondering if the beam shape stays planted at highway speed, thats what seems to let the factory ones down imo
    • I have a 2018 Silverado Custom with 156k on the odometer. In the last month I've replaced the plugs, wires and the driver side engine mount. My wife just returned from a trip of about 1500 miles and told me the brakes are making a grinding noise when applied. I drove it and looked it over and this is what I found with the driver's side rear rotor.   I'm going to order new pads and check about having the rotor resurfaced. Hopefully this is easier than the last 2 jobs.   Peace  
    • Any update if the new valve cover help with the oil consumption?  I have a 2014 GMC sierra and my truck is consuming a lot of oil so I’m wondering if replacing the driver side valve cover will stop some of the oil consumption. Thanks 
    • I bought belts and pulleys for my '20 L5P at Rock Auto a couple years ago. I have used them for many years, and almost always save significant money, especially when I buy maintenance stuff ahead of time.   They carry many OEM parts, which is all I use unless an aftermarket is shown to be same/superior, or if it is an insignificant part or unavailable OEM part anywhere else. RA is usually lower priced, often by a bunch, but parts are sometimes unavailable or out of stock, and I do shop around and sometimes find better prices at other sites.   Be aware that you pay shipping, and if you buy multiple items and they are coming from different warehouses, the shipping can kill the advantage. Planning ahead is best if possible.   If you have a transmission service in the near future, check out their OEM (AC Delco ULV) fluid, usually MUCH less than anywhere else.
    • New member here, very long time occasional guest. Saw this thread, thought it would be a good time to contribute someting. It is only my experience and not a claim that everyone will have the same.   I bought my '20 3500 L5P new and have put 99.9% (literally) of it's current ~400k miles on it myself, with over 50% of that towing loads between 4k to 15k, and to me this truck has been nothing short of amazing. For the first 235k I had zero issues, and from there until 321k I replaced a NOx sensor, two failing glow plugs, and three of the notorious injector connectors. I believe this truck is in part, a testament to good luck, but also good care and following a decent maintenance schedule (I also keep meticulous records.) As a result, it looks as good as a well cared for 70k rig, up and down, inside and out.   At some point before that 321k mile mark I began to get a little spooked about the 10L1000, especially the valve body. Word of mouth about potential issues prompted me to jump on the net to sift through all the noise and determine what all the fuss was about. I routinely take long trips, coast-to-coast and points in between, so roadside breakdowns can be '...a thousand miles from nowhere' and a bit of a challenge, and though I had no issues, my guard was up and activated.   And then I stumbled across a chance to salvage some parts off a new 2025 that had been wrecked in transport. I grabbed a few wear items (alternator, pulleys, etc.) and on a whim asked what the ten speeder would cost me. It was cheap...really cheap. I knew some changes had been made in the '24+ version 10L and were supposedly not compatible, but I called service/parts at my local Chevy dealer and asked why and they didn't know. A call to a well known aftermarket transmission outfit revealed it was very likely it would be fine, but to them not 100% sure.   Because it was cheap (really cheap) and I was spooked, I took the chance. Had it installed by a local shop and it worked like a champ, shifted just like the original. At it's first service at 37k, I had the shop put in a Next Gen valve body kit, which after some initial hiccups and rough shifts, smoothed out though with somewhat firmer shifting.   All that said, I have a very serious concern about my newer transmission as just two weeks ago it suddenly began to exhibit a strong reluctance to engage forward or reverse. It was a bit past due anyway so I took it in for service. The reason it was sticking was due to 'glitter' in the fluid clogging the filter...not good folks, often indicates a converter giving out. We ended up going ahead with the new filter and fluid, first to see if it would move and shift, and then if so buy me a little time. It did, and I've driven it over a thousand miles and it is shifting smooth, no noises or slipping. Regardless, it looks like a third gearbox is in my future so I can resume taking long trips with some confidence. In the very short term, my curiosity will have me examining the fluid to check how much glitter has reappeared.   An earlier poster had alleged, in the context of 10L100 failures, that it is another example of how we seasoned citizens somehow descend into hysteria, lose control of our senses, and react irrationally after brief encounters with the idiocy of the internet infosphere. Let me say (and I have used and abused said internet since it's infancy) there is no segment of the populace that has a corner on over-reaction to digital garbage. Just as my offering of experience in this arena is purely anecdotal and should not be considered gospel or all-encompassing, I believe it is still worthwhile information to consider, along with other relevant anecdotal experiences about things like complex transmissions, especially when balanced with other sources.   So to answer the original question, yes I got high miles out of my first 10L, trouble free for 321,000. Now I really wonder how much longer it would have went. Did I 'overreact' to the internet ghouls by replacing a 'good' one with a 'bad' one? Maybe. Who knows, the thing might have taken a puke a 100 miles later. So I'll just fix it again, then move on and start thinking about all the other stuff that will eventually wear out. It still has the original brakes (they're at ~60%), original injectors/pump, turbo, water pump, etc....pretty much original everything. Knock on wood.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...