Jump to content

Question on oxygen sensors?


Recommended Posts

Posted

I cannot find any information on when these should be changed.  Are these a consumable part that should be changed after so many miles or months/years?

 

I've heard they can get fouled really easy requiring replacement.  Just want to make sure before I part with $25 for a new one.

 

Thx  :(

Posted

Don't change it out until you need to.  When it goes bad you'll know.  The SES light will come on.  It's not a normal maintance item like plugs or wires, its more like a CV Joint/Boot, you only replace it when it goes bad.  Save your money.  I've got 97K on my Blazer and it needed a new one at 27K under warranty but thats it.  Been fine since then

 

Joe

Posted

Thanks Joe!  But this one is actually for my older Blazer (1985), that has been having some trouble.  At high speeds the check engine light has been coming on for a few minutes, then goes out.  Always goes out when I slow down.

 

Plus it's been a little sluggish so I'm thinking the air/fuel mix is off.

 

What do you think?

Posted

What Joe said.  It's not a normal routine maintanance item unless it is not performing.

 

Chances are, it being an '85, it's not a self heating O2 sensor (look for 2 wires on it) and with high mileage, it probably wouldn't hurt anything if you did change it.  They aren't that expensive.

 

If it is a 4 wire O2, then it's a self heating unit and if you have a scan tool of some sort you can see if it's doing it's job upon initial heating.  This is a tell tale sign of the O2 sensor doing it's job.  If you can scan it, when you turn the key on, it's millivolts (Mv) should start somewhere high like in the .600 to say even .900Mv range.  But within a few seconds should drop down considerably (I have specs at home somewhere I can look up) as the O2 heats itself.

 

A simple and cheaper way would be to pull the O2 you have, clean up the O2 bung as well as the threads on the sensor itself and even clean up the sniffer section of the sensor.  Sometimes after years and mileage, it loses a good low resistance connection and a simple cleaning can do wonders.

Posted

Well I'll tell you what.  I did have it changed about 4-5 years ago when the check engine light was doing the same thing.

 

It's just a single wire.  I went ahead and disconnected the connector and cleaned it out and put it back together since it was all crudded up with grime.  That same day I got the check engine light on the freeway like normal.  Next day though, no check engine light, which is great!  Today driving to work I noticed it's got quite a bit of pep back.  Well see if it stays consistent when I come home on the freeway tonight.  I wonder if it took a day or so for the air/fuel adjustment to settle in?  

 

Thanks for the help, as usual!  

 

later  :thumb:

Posted

actually, bowtie_pasta, what they are telling you is bull. single wire o2 sensors should be repalced every 50,000miles, and 4wire o2 sensors should be replaced every 100,000miles because even though you may not get a check engine light, o2 sensors  can "slow down" and not respond as well when they get old cause of the chemical reaction inside the sensor. and the ONLY TRUE way to know if an o2 sensor is working PROPERLY is with an ossiliscope to actually see the smooth fluctuating mv from 50-700mv.

single wire o2 sensors are fairly cheap, anyway.

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted
Just as a follow up, I changed it and it didn't take care of the problem.  I'm still getting the intermittent check engine light at consistent speeds above 55mph.  As soon as I slow the RPM's down or come to a stop it will go out.  Along with this I have quite a bit a hesistation while accelerating.  I'm almost thinking I need a new carb.  I had it rebuilt a couple years back.  Who knows???   ???
Posted
it sounds like an engine problem.  you should probably take it to someone that know what they're doing rather than replacing random parts and hoping it goes away,
Posted
The last responce begs a question for which I don't have an answer: Where do you find someone who knows what they're doing with a computer controlled carburetor.  I never knew of one that ran even sort of right in the '80s or '90s...who can fix them now?
Posted
actually, bowtie_pasta, what they are telling you is bull. single wire o2 sensors should be repalced every 50,000miles, and 4wire o2 sensors should be replaced every 100,000miles because even though you may not get a check engine light, o2 sensors  can "slow down" and not respond as well when they get old cause of the chemical reaction inside the sensor. and the ONLY TRUE way to know if an o2 sensor is working PROPERLY is with an ossiliscope to actually see the smooth fluctuating mv from 50-700mv.

single wire o2 sensors are fairly cheap, anyway.

No it isn't "bull!"  I've never changed O2 sensors as a preventative maintanence item.  Only when they go bad.  Yes, they will slow down response over time, but as long as they do their job within normal operating parameters, there is no need to replace them until they STOP operating in those parameters.

 

You also don't need an oscilloscope to monitor them, I monitor them with my laptop.

 

I suppose you change your headlights every 10,000 miles too because they get a little dimmer than what they were when they were brand new!  :D

Posted

actually, jackass, im an automotive technician of about 3 years, and as an o2 sensor slows over time, you fuel milage suffers, also. in fact, just yesterday, i had a ford taurus in my shop for a "check engine" light, and the code was a po430, catylist system efficiency below threshold(bank 2), well, even with your cheap autotap laptop system, you would have probably say the o2 sensors working just fine, and condemdend the cats, a $600 mistake! but my Sun engine anylizer confirmed the cats were just fine and the post cat o2's were the problem, even though they wear fluctuating from .1-.9mv. you definatly arent even close to ASE cert, are you?

 

my point, just cause its working(especially an o2 sensor), doesnt mean that its working properly.

Posted

Here's another thought.  I'm sure I've got the original CAT on the thing.  Is it a possibility that it's plugged?  From what I hear the old 'pancake' style CATS tend to clog up easier.

 

thanks

 

PS - this is just my daily driver so I don't mind tinkering on it, just as long as it keeps rolling down the road...

Posted

That was a GREAT article, thanks for the link!  :thumb:

 

Since I don't smog this bad boy I'm gonna see about having the exhaust redone, with NO CAT.

 

Thanks again.  :D

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.3k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,677
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    RobbertClaus
    Newest Member
    RobbertClaus
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 508 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • No I didn’t watch a video of a person who analyzes oil for a living explain general oil usage. For clarity I did ask my brothers one who runs our equipment business. The other who runs our old ROW business about oil usage. Nothing has changed since I retired. Their personal vehicles or work vehicles use no oil. Not enough to see on the oil checking device. Then I pondered. I like to ponder. In this extended oil changing world with oil change countdowns or lights. If engines used say a qt every 2500 miles or up to even 4000 miles. With oil changes reaching as high as 15000 miles. Normal for most people is eight to ten. Vehicles should potentially be seizing up all over the place. Especially in hilly terrain. Just how many people actually check their oil? Maybe 10 percent. Those are the people that probably change their oil early. I like to research used car listings. I have five favorite dealers I check. They all list carfax with their listing. It’s rare to see vehicles with anything but extended oil changes. Transmission service, forget about it. I’ve seen Honda and Toyota certified vehicles up to 100K miles and ten years old. With nothing but normal maintenance. Isn’t nice we all have different experiences and believe our way is the best. You certainly get backup for whatever you believe. Life would be boring otherwise.
    • Interesting rumor. Dealers near me have been tight-lipped so far, but if this reveal actually happens next week, I'm really hoping they finally give the HD a proper interior overhaul. The competition has been eating their lunch in the cabin department for a while now.
    • There are a few good takeaways in that video that pertain to this thread, certainly the possibility of the oil control rings having buildup, the fuel injectors and how clean or not that they are ending up affecting the pistons rings carbon buildup, and the fact that its normal up to a point for a given engine to use some oil, and that the oil quality that is being utilized is part of that ring clogging up issue as well.   I was talking with a neighbor yesterday who has a baby LZ0 duramax and he had bought it slightly used but it does consume some oil and he has switched over to 5W-30 Euro spec oil and in this case that never made a difference in consumption over the factory 0W-20 recommendation. He finds it uses a quart in about 3500 miles and as he goes a ways over that distance he adds oil to full and goes another 1000 miles or so and then changes oil and is typically at 40% or so left on the oil monitor at that point with his use case of quite a lot of highway miles and more limited in short run use. I don't know what other LZ0 engines are doing for oil consumption but that is what his is doing. 
    • I dont care what Lake says. Goodnight. 
    • Ok well I guess Lake disagrees with me on a few points. I call oil consumption pretty basic. Rudimentary. He calls it "really complicated." I think 1qt consumed in 3k miles is a lot. He says that's normal. In 22 minutes, he'll use his natural talent to explain oil consumption to anyone watching this video. He covers everything from obvious engine damage to how normally functioning healthy engines consume oil by design. Lake explicitly states how you drive will impact oil consumption.   Shut up and watch:    
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...