Jump to content

Volant Air Intake + Air Scoop + Granatelli MAF


Recommended Posts

Posted

I ordered a Volant Airbox, Granatelli MAF and the Volant air scoop a few weeks ago and finally got them all installed today.  I got the Volant airbox and Granatelli MAF about two weeks ago, but did not get the air scoop till today.  Not being one to wait around, I installed the Volant Airbox and Granatelli MAF as soon as I got them.  Installation was pretty straightforward, but the Volant Airbox mounting holes did not match up to the factory holes.  They weren't off by much, so I simply enlarged two of the holes with my drill.  Perfect.  

 

Result:  I didn't notice a bit of difference.  Mileage and power seemed about the same to me.  Upon considering the design of the factory airflow, I'm wasn't too surprised.  The cold air somehow enters the airbox through the right front fender.  I'm still somewhat baffled at how this setup works at all.  In any case, I was prepared to wait for the Air scoop to see what it does.

 

Got the Volant Air Scoop in the mail today and headed straight for the garage. Hmm.... looks like I'm gonna have to remove the airbox....which means disconnecting the MAF and the air intake to the throttle body.  Got everything taken apart and got the Air scoop in place.  Re-assembled everything and fired up the truck.  Good, no check engine light.

 

Time for the test drive.  Backing out of the driveway I notice a rubbing sound when I turn the wheel about half way to the left.  Hmm.....  Pull back in the garage and inspect.  Looks like the Air scoop is pushing back on the wheelwell liner.  Not much, but just enough to rub.  Oh well, I'll worry about that later.  Back o nthe road, throttle response seems much improved right off the line.  The Denali feels a lot quicker from 30-50mph.  Engine seems much more eager to rev up and go.  Not surprising, IMHO, since the engine is actually being force fed cold air.

 

So, except for the rubbing issue, I'm pretty impressed with the Volant Intake and Air Scoop.  I definitely would not do just the Airbox without the Scoop.  I think I can engineer a way to eliminate the rubbing issue, but for now, it's fine as is.

  • 2 months later...
Posted

Where did you buy them? Does it seem like there would be any water problems or a need to take it off in the winter? There web site is a little weak, but it looks like a nice piece.

Guest loneranger
Posted

Thank you for posting that info! :P I am reading all I can about the different CAI, and they all seem to be doing the same thing, just the looks are different, and of course the price. The Volant doesn't impress me, until the scoop is added. As you wrote, the scoop made a big difference. All others CAI have nothing equivalent to the Volant scoop, most just have a larger tube and an open filter with some kind of shield for the engine heat. The Volant unit is enclosed (very bad IMO), adding the scoop solves the problem.

Posted

Well, I'm now up to 9,000 miles on my Denali in 4.5 months and I removed the Volant intake, scoop, and Granatelli at 7,000 miles. I decided to open up the airbox to take a look at the condition of the filter. What a shock!! The filter looks like it had been washed out to the point that there was no oil left on the filter. Like K&N filters, the Volant air filter is coated with oil for filtration purposes. After less than 5,000 miles, the filter was completely washed clean of any oil. The only way this would happen is if water was getting into the airbox. We've had some pretty serious storms here in Ohio this year and I can't help but think that the Volant scoop is scooping up water as well as air. Not wanting to risk engine water ingestion, I removed everything. I think the problem with the Volant scoop is that it draws air (and water) from too close to the ground.

 

I know some other guys here have created some home brew CAI systems, but I just can't bring myself to believe that drawing air from the tow hook area is a wise decision. If there were some way to draw air from a higher point like behind the grille, I think I would be interested. But, on my truck, it doesn't appear that that is a possibility.

Posted

I have the Volant with the scoop too. I check the air filter in mine about once a week because I live in an area with alot of bugs and the scoop picks up lots of them. The filter get dirty very quick and I just take it off and knock the bugs out when it gets too many. I've checked the filter and filter box area after driving through hard rain and found no signs of water in the box. I was not very impressed with the filter that came with the Volant, like your's it looked like the oil was gone, but after only several hundred miles. I bought a K&N filter to replace the blue oiled one and the oil in it looks new after over 1000 miles. I was also not very impressed with the way the tube mounts, it fell off one day after a long drive. I modified it a little and put a big black tie wrap around it to hold it to the frame of the truck.

Posted

Yeah. my Volant mount and scoop fell off one day while I was driving down the road. Luckily I was able to recover the scoop. I created my own homebrew mount to re-mount it.

Posted

It would seem to me that the water would have to travel vertically up the scoop quiet a long distance to be worried about water ingestion. I would be more worried about a functional hood scoop or the ram air on camero/firebird that it right up front (where water could travel straight and down). Thanks for the info on the filter though, maybe it is junk.

Posted

I've had the Volant scoop and airbox on two trucks. My '01 Silverado for almost two years, and now I have the same scoop and airbox on my '03 Sierra. I have had no problem with the scoop falling off or the way it fits. You guys need to torque them hose clamps a little tighter. Some big tyraps around the frame hold the lower end of the scoop just fine. You can also fabricate a small bracket and attach the scoop to the lower lip of your airdam.

 

I don't buy the theory about water entering UP the scoop. The distance to the box from the opening is almost 2 ft. (most of it uphill). I have seen some signs of water in my box, but not much. I believe the water comes in from the side of the box where the stock opening is. Also water can enter the top through the lid. I put some weatherstrip on the bottom of my lid on all four sides. I also installed weatherstrip on the inside of the right fender where the Volant box opening is. It is easier to stick the weatherstrip on the truck than trying to get it to stick to the Volant box. It was a bit tricky installing the box with the weatherstrip in the way, but it keeps a majority of the water from entering the box (especially when it gets washed or is parked in the rain).

 

Think about what happens when you drive. Water is coming at you from the front. Water goes right into the spaces around the right headlight, and directly into your airbox. Water hitting the scoop from the front, has to make TWO turns and go UP quite a distance to get to the filter.

 

...just my two cents

 

NewGrill_RamAir.JPG

Posted

Maybe I am overreacting to the water ingestion possibility. What really worried me is the condition of the filter. I will have to look into getting a K&N filter to replace the Volant one and see what happens.

 

Victory Red: What is that mesh grille that is directly in front of the Volant scoop?

 

In retrospect, I think I like the UPD (NSV) airbox better than the Volant since the top of the Volant box needs to be reinforced with weatherstripping.

Posted

I've decided to re-install the Volant with air scoop, but only after installing a K&N RF-1037 filter with the RF-1037DK Drycharger filter wrap which is designed to repel water.

Posted

it might help to think about your engine as an air pump. the intake is a straw, and the pump is sucking air throw the straw depending on throttle. ram air is a myth - you need to go much faster than 65 to force air into the throttle body. the vaccuum created by the engine is much stronger - water is ingested because when it rains, the mist from the road is sucked into the combustion chamber along with the air. if you want a cold air intake, you're best off with a snorkel.

Posted
water is ingested because when it rains, the mist from the road is sucked into the combustion chamber along with the air. if you want a cold air intake, you're best off with a snorkel.

last time I checked, gravity pulls rain down. I'm not saying you don't get water in from the towhook, but i think i'd rather do that than have an opening above for water to fall straight down....that is unless i was crossing a river.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Still $3.01 with even more places at this price
    • JW2024 and Others is this site for Oshawa built Trucks as well ? Thank You !
    • Thanks JR that would be great if you could do that !!! Do you have a link to where this was discussed before ? I cant seem to find it  Thank You Again !
    • Oil pump noise was discussed before.  I will try to remember to record a remote start later this morning. 
    • There are probably a few threads talking about fuel mileage but this one seemed to fit the stats I have seen based on my typical local driven route but with different outcomes based on different seasons/temperatures. I have a few hundred pounds of items that consistently ride on the truck at all times such as a bak flip cover, rubber bed mat, tools and extra fuel so I would be something over 8100 lb without me in the truck. All these examples are based on a 100 mile round trip to a town plus running around town so maybe 110 to 120 miles in total for a trip. Using regular fuel and I assume it always has some ethanol in it but don't know the percentage they blend in. Also speed wise I am going at 62 mph and non aggressive driving although less speed yet if its crappy winter condition roads. I am going by an initial reset of the computer generated fuel use numbers averaged over a couple of thousand miles or so for each weather/season so they may be more optimistic then actual hand calculated numbers. Basically this is painting a picture of doing the same drive but seasonal conditions and temperature being the major variable to the end result. Oh and although I am in Alberta Canada, I am converting it to miles per US gallon so there is no confusion.    So winter time it gets cold here, no real surprise there and the roads can be clear at times but also often have packed rough snow or are are driving through loose snow ( they do a poor job of plowing the highways ) and yes this includes the extra idle engine time due to trying not to freeze ones butt off. 12.7 mpg is what I was getting during the winter months on average.    Then during the spring when it was around the freezing point and the highways are clear of snow, I was getting around 14.25 mpg.   Summer time, I have been getting around 15.15 on average but certainly some of the trips showed quite a bit better fuel mileage, so much depended on how much or little I had driven around town and number of engine restarts after sitting for a while at each location. But stating a best fuel mileage trip to town pretending that is what the truck gets on average is fooling ones self for sure !.      As I said in a different post, I had driven a 645 mile trip over a couple of days stint to a different destination then these other daily to town examples above, and was done during the summer with nice weather and not bucking a head wind, also keeping at 62 mph and its a rolling landscape type highway drive ( this isn't southern Alberta or Saskatchewan flat lands ) Hand calculated fuel mileage in this case though and it came out to 17.65
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...