Jump to content

2015 Silverado HID Install questions/problems


Recommended Posts

Posted

So I have my HID's installed on my 2015 Silverado and I am having a few issues. Yes I read through the ENTIRE HID thread, searched and then searched some more and couldn't find the answer. I have done HID installs many times before but have never had to use cancelers or a relay kit. So the low beams are working intermittently which I know the relay harness kit will fix. I have no flickering and when the DRL's/low beams do come on they are fine. What I installed so far is the following:

 

H11 HID Kit:

 

https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B004ZF4NAY/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o03_s01?ie=UTF8&psc=1

 

Error/Capacitor Kit:

 

https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00HTOB0NG/ref=od_aui_detailpages01?ie=UTF8&psc=1

 

My questions are the following:

 

1.) Once I install the relay kit, are the error cancelers still needed since this is a 55W kit?

 

2.) Is two error eliminators needed with the relay kit since the driver side is receiving signal from the passenger side?

 

2.) Does the high beams require a relay kit? They are working 100% right now with no issues.

 

3.) Kensun's customer service is pretty awesome. I called them this morning and they are sending me this relay/resistor harness (https://www.amazon.com/Kensun-Conversion-Universal-Anti-Flicker-Resistor/dp/B00FP0G5RC/ref=sr_1_2?s=automotive&ie=UTF8&qid=1471291938&sr=1-2&keywords=kensun+resistor#Ask) free of charge and said it will fix my issues. I have never seen relay harness kit like this before so I am not sure. They said with this kit, the error cancelers will not be needed.

 

I hate to be that guy to start a new thread but these are in my truck now and I am going to work on them in a few hours so I am hoping to get some definite answers. If not, it is going to be trial and error till I can get them fixed but if someone else has been in this situation and can provide answers, that would be awesome.

Posted

Well the relay harness fixed the driver side but the passenger side was still acting up. I tried every combo you can think of. With relay kit, without, capacitors, no capacitors, swapped ballasts, etc.

 

I got out the test light and everything has good power up until the output of the ballast. I connected it directly to the relay harness and the ballast barely lights up my the test light which leads me to believe the ballast is bad. I have a new harness coming in as well as a new HID kit to swap bulbs and ballast. I will keep this updated so hopefully others will be able to use it.

Posted

Another update, neither low beam is working currently. Good thing I ordered a whole complete kit to swap it out for. If I cannot get this resolved, may just go the morimoto route or back to stock. The high beams and fogs work flawlessly.

Posted

Well I finally caved.. (in a good way). I decided to put the good old saying "buy once, cry once" into affect and ordered a full FXR kit from fastheadlights with the morimoto HID kit (http://www.fastheadlights.com/ProductDetails.asp?ProductCode=fxr_chevy_retrofit-kit). I orginally had planned on doing the HID kit first and FXR later but figured just spend the coin and get it over with. I chose FastHeadlights because I really like the small business idea, they are active on the forums and they are the only company that offered a full plug and play kit with the projectors.

 

This morning was kind of a deal breaker for me since neither headlight was turning on so something isn't right. I really do not think it is the kits fault but more so on the truck side. The DRL's on these trucks play havoc with HID ballasts and I think killed them prematurely. PWN is brutal on the ballasts and I think Morimoto is the only company that really has it figured out. I checked with TRS and they even recommend going to fastheadlights as they are a certified wholesaler for their stuff. FWIW, the high beams and fogs work flawlessly with no relay kit or capacitor.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,943
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Dom Colussi
    Newest Member
    Dom Colussi
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 665 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • The timing marks are ok, that is #1, you can turn it over until they line up and it won't change anything, the crankshaft turns twice for every camshaft revolution, I have always set up SB Chevs as your pic shows using a straight edge
    • Someone's been here before.... There is a receipt for a 3-piece timing set, purchased earlier this year.   Is this picture something, or, nothing?   I have the timing cover off and my crank is perfectly TDC and the keyed gear's locating mark is dead on 12 o'clock.   The cam gear locating mark is also at 12 o'clock. Now, I'm not an expert, but all the install guides say the two locating marks should meet and be perfectly aligned when installing a timing set. The mark on the crank should be dead on 12:00 and the cam gear's mark should be dead on 6:00, and both marks should be perfectly vertically aligned.   I believe the timing gear is keyed or has a dowel that ensures it can only be installed on the cam in one position, so I have to believe the cam is out of phase somehow. At the very least, with a triangular bolt pattern, it can only be installed in one of 3 different positions.   Before I pulled the front cover, the truck was running alright, no service engine soon lights except an occasional P0172 / rich condition. Timing -16 timing at idle (should be +16), and total -35% fuel trim, two conditions I haven't been able to figure out.   In related news, my injector tested pretty well, wasn't leaking, but I had it rebuilt anyway, and it's on it's way back to me.         Along with this discovery, the good and bad:   Good: The oil pan seal appears undamaged.   Bad: -The timing cover has been reused, and the positioning dowels have been broken. That could explain some of the leaking. -Some kind of white paste or grease was used to try to seal the oil pan seal and timing cover (since wiped off..). -Then, someone globbed silicone all over the front of the cover and also buried the ckp sensor in it. But, they didn't put any inside the cover or use RTV to try to seal the oil pan seal with the timing cover (good).
    • The guy that owns K&P filters last I checked in with him has over 300,000 miles on his Dodge base Hemi using his own 35 micron absolute stainless mesh filter from its first oil change.    The GM study I've posted a dozen times shows the relationship in engine life based in multiples of base units, not miles or years. That is the base unit is the number of miles the motor ran using the reference filter efficiency.    The above two paragraphs dismantle anecdotal arguments IF one changes oil often enough to prevent particle formation and the motor is in otherwise good shape. That is not full of silica (no air filter) or suffering a metallurgical issue that is not part of the lubrication discussion. Poor heat treat in example.   Data from UOA's I've reviewed from more than a few engines can show remarkably broad variations in oil cleanliness using the exact same filter over the course of an engines life.     Lastly there is the common sense of it. Wear debris WILL circulate the engine BEFORE it ever sees a filter in route to that filter and WILL harm the pump which NEVER sees filtered oil.    Alpha question then becomes, given the facts, how long do you believe is a reasonable service life from a vehicle you are certain you will not pass down? That is the junk yard will be it's resting place when you're done with it? (the moral issue most don't care about).    Omega question is then how diligent are you prepared to be in general mechanical, air & oil maintenance? Preventing particulates and keeping them sufficiently dilute; preventing the precursors from generation, amalgamation and precipitation.    If I get a good look at the engine bay of a vehicle I have a fair idea of the owners commitment to the inside of the power train. That 30 micron WIX is still more efficient than a sieve.                 
    • It also depends on what criteria someone is using for “best” when talking filters.  Are we going off best efficiency?   Best quality/QC?  Etc. because the two may not mutually exclusive.  
    • They’re not the same wiz as 10-15 years ago.  QC has fallen pretty hard.  The XP line was never good though in the first place.    https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/wix-filter-rusted-through.386492/post-6991372   https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/i-ve-used-my-last-wix-filter.27299/   https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/looking-for-a-better-replacement-for-wix-51258.403977/   https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/convince-me-in-using-the-purolator-boss.401537/post-7420147   the forums are littered with posts and examples of not great wix filters the last couple years 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...