Jump to content

spark plugs


Recommended Posts

Posted

When should I start looking to change out my spark plugs. I have 30K on it now, and I know supposedly their good for 100k, but I'll believe that when i see it. So when shoudl I swap them out for a new set? And when I do what have ya'll been using and getting good results with as far as brand is concerned. In the blazer I used to use autolites, and they seemed to work fairly well, but I heard from a mechanic that AC Delco wasn't bad either....Just to make people laugh I used to have to change out the blazer plugs before every long trip, and about every 2k, they were always nice and gunked, oiled, and crapped up. But it's always cheaper to buy new plugs then get a new engine......until i get a new engine.

 

 

tmf

Posted

I plan on changing the plugs on my 6.0L at 50,000 miles. That is a good long plug life I think. I would never go 100,000 mi like GM says they can do. I have heard that the best option is to replace them with the OEM AcDelco plugs. I have had no problems with mine so another set at 50,000 should work just fine. I also plan on having the radiator flushed and filled at 50,000 as well. In talking with the service manager at my dealer he suggested not to go the 100,000 miles on the radiator fluid even thought it is supposed to last that long. :P

Posted

Mine just turned 20k and I replaced them two weeks ago. I highly suggest you do the same. Perhaps you'll see some fuel economy return.

 

My plugs looked terrible. They were the proper color which means they were burning properly but the whole tip (not just the electrode) had a powedery, flakey white crap all over them. I also checked the gap on them and just like the F-Body's, gap was all over the place. One was gapped at .045 another at .065. Very inconsistent with the factory .060 recommended gap.

 

It ran much smoother, quieter, and I even seemed (at least in my mind) to get some fuel economy back. At least it didn't seem to burn as much in the first 1/4 tank as it had been. I also went with a non-platinum plug for more performance. If you do the same, you'll HAVE to replace them more frequently.

Posted

I replaced the plugs on my 2000 GMC at 85K miles. They were burned up pretty good.

 

I replaced them with NGK TR55s gapped at .055 and swapped out the wires while I was at it with Taylors :)

 

Don't mind the rusty manifold :cool:

 

00gmc_taylors.jpg

Posted
Try the copper electrode instead of the platinum, they work better. So what if you have to change them every 4-5K.

I heard that. Screw those platinum plugs. Delco 46's where a real good plug back in the day.

Posted

Simple metalurgy would tell you that.

 

Platinum is a hard metal. As such it has a higher resistance which leads to a weaker spark (compared to a softer metal) and therefore longevity is the result. If you resist firing moreso than another, you'll last longer, right?

 

Copper on the other hand, is a softer, and as such more condusive to electricity. It'll create a stronger spark because it isn't as resistant. But the trade off is, they don't last as long as the softer metal burns away faster.

 

So for performance, copper or other soft metal is preferable. For longevity, Platinum, titanium or other is highly recommended.

Posted
Simple metalurgy would tell you that.

 

Platinum is a hard metal. As such it has a higher resistance which leads to a weaker spark (compared to a softer metal) and therefore longevity is the result. If you resist firing moreso than another, you'll last longer, right?

 

Copper on the other hand, is a softer, and as such more condusive to electricity. It'll create a stronger spark because it isn't as resistant. But the trade off is, they don't last as long as the softer metal burns away faster.

 

So for performance, copper or other soft metal is preferable. For longevity, Platinum, titanium or other is highly recommended.

What plugs do you run in your truck CMNT.

Posted
Mine just turned 20k and I replaced them two weeks ago.  I highly suggest you do the same.  Perhaps you'll see some fuel economy return.

 

My plugs looked terrible.  They were the proper color which means they were burning properly but the whole tip (not just the electrode) had a powedery, flakey white crap all over them.  I also checked the gap on them and just like the F-Body's, gap was all over the place.  One was gapped at .045 another at .065.  Very inconsistent with the factory .060 recommended gap.

 

It ran much smoother, quieter, and I even seemed (at least in my mind) to get some fuel economy back.  At least it didn't seem to burn as much in the first 1/4 tank as it had been.  I also went with a non-platinum plug for more performance.  If you do the same, you'll HAVE to replace them more frequently.

I changed the factory plugs in my 8.1 at 55,000 miles and had the same issues.The plugs were all gapped different and covered in this chalky,crusty white crap.I went with the Champion platinum tips.They are less than $2.00 at NAPA.I like the extended service intrevals of the newer vehicles,but will never run the plugs in this truck more than 20,000 miles.They are very cheap and the 8.1 with the metal covers on the wires is a very easy job.It took about 30 minutes to do the swap and no bloody knuckles either.I don't see how GM thinks these things will go 100,000 miles on the factory plugs.

Posted

Have any of you guys swapped out the factory plug wires for aftermarket? Is it worth it? I've heard that you should swap out the wires with the plugs, because they wear out too.

Posted
Have any of you guys swapped out the factory plug wires for aftermarket?  Is it worth it?  I've heard that you should swap out the wires with the plugs, because they wear out too.

I never have tried aftermarket wires on one of these now distributerless motors but have never noticed any large improvements in the past on other motors, generally wires should outlast several plug sets, if you have a dmm check them for resistance , look for cracking of the insulation jacket or arking/pitting/corosion on the contacts, if they look good keep using them

 

spec from GM manual for the 8.1

firing order 1-8-7-2-6-5-4-3

wire resistance 10,000 ohms's /foot

plug torque 15 ft-lb

plug gap .060"

Posted

well I changed mine also few things to report, first the manual was wrong, the plug wires are about 6" so by the manual they should run about 5,000 ohms but they were all right around 500, did the writer have a type-O? they were all to close in resistance and in good condition for them all to be out of spec

 

also my truck has 43k miles and these are the original plugs they are caked with carbon and ash don't think my truck would run if left til 100K

 

http://webpages.charter.net/raventai/DSCN1073.jpg

 

 

I was going to get standard plugs also but wound up going with bosch platinums as they were only 1.99 /each at advanced auto, a good price for a long lasting plug

Posted
Simple metalurgy would tell you that.

 

Platinum is a hard metal.  As such it has a higher resistance which leads to a weaker spark (compared to a softer metal) and therefore longevity is the result.  If you resist firing moreso than another, you'll last longer, right?

 

Copper on the other hand, is a softer, and as such more condusive to electricity.  It'll create a stronger spark because it isn't as resistant.  But the trade off is, they don't last as long as the softer metal burns away faster.

 

So for performance, copper or other soft metal is preferable.  For longevity, Platinum, titanium or other is highly recommended.

What plugs do you run in your truck CMNT.

Bad,

 

NGK TR55 is what I used and is the stock heat range replacement for our plugs. Same as the LS1 and other Vortec truck engines. If you were running a blower, nitrous or something else, I'd go NGK TR6 which is one heat range cooler.

 

I'm glad to see I'm nto the only one with crappy looking plugs ARE!

 

As to plug wires, yes aftermarket plug wires work phenomenally IN CERTAIN APPLICATIONS! For our CNP ignition design, they work great. I've had both Magnacore and now run MSD wires on my LS1. You can use the same set of wires as the LS1 on 4.8's, 5.3's, and even 6.0's. 8.1's need a wire just a tad longer. I tried with a few MSD's off my Camaro and they were probably an inch too short for the Big Block.

 

To determine how they were better, I got my multi-meter out and measured the resistance in the wire. Stockers were 300 - 400 ohms of resistance. Measuring the MSD's were like 30-40 ohms of resistance. Big difference. Less resistance means more electrical power reaches it's end user...the spark plug. Now, certain vehicles like many of GM's front wheel drive V6 cars with D.I.S. ignition systems, primarily those in the 60 degree family do not take well to aftermarket wires and will actually fry the insides of them.

Posted

A wire set for the LS1 cars will not work unless the are extra long. They are a little too short for the truck motors. Sorry.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • So after reading the reveal from Chevrolet, I kept asking myself...why did the trim levels change?   Here are the official ones:   Work Truck (WT): The quintessential fleet truck, built with durable, easy-to-clean interiors for commercial or utilitarian use. Custom: A stylish, road-oriented trim that adds a more refined appearance, standard dual exhaust, and modern exterior styling. Custom Trail Boss: An entry-level off-roader featuring a 2-inch factory suspension lift and 34-inch mud-terrain tires on a budget. Silverado: Serving as the new base consumer truck (replacing the previous LT trim), it comes standard with the Z71 off-road package when equipped with 4WD. Trail Boss: Steps up the off-road hardware with the 2-inch lift, 34-inch tires, monotube shocks, an exclusive off-road hood, and more premium interior options. ZR2: The flagship off-roader. It boasts 35-inch mud-terrain tires, Multimatic DSSV dampers, front and rear electronic lockers, forged carbon-fiber interior accents, and an available hardcore Bison Edition (co-developed with AEV). High Country: The pinnacle of luxury. It replaces bright chrome with modern satin chrome, 22-inch wheels, premium leather, real wood interior trim, a panoramic sunroof, and an exclusive front-passenger touchscreen. As others have stated, why would you want a Silverado - 'Silverado' - wth?? LT needs to remain!!!   Also, there will no longer be a dedicated Z71 model.  All 4x4 trucks will have the Z71 package. Carplay is also something that cannot be removed.  Hopefully it will remain.     I am excited about the 5.7L V8 (350 C.I.D.)  Old school Chevy power.  My only concern is whatever version of AFM/DFM cylinder deactivation.  Too bad that isn't an option a buyer can choose to have or not.   I will definitely be stopping by my local dealership when these trucks start showing up.
    • I haven't seen diesel for less than $5.30 anywhere in my area
    • The not as clean as one would assume theme with the new engine oil, that reminds me of comments over the years with mechanics not always being so on board with filling an oil filter, not from the center anyway due to that typically being the clean side of the filter, danger of some contaminant falling into the filter if not careful but the realization now that the oil may not be as pure as one had assumed it would surely be. Yes it would be possible to fill from the small holes but that means messing with something to prop open the anti drain back valve if the filter is so equipped and not damage that valve in the process. Me, I have hardly ever prefilled an engine oil filter however I have prefilled diesel fuel filters with a filter on a fuel bulk tank and for anyone that has messed with diesel engines with filters and units that have a limited or no way of priming them, putting on a dry filter is a bad day to say the least with those crappy systems. But anyway back to not so clean engine oil, indeed perhaps its not so bad after all that I have not made a practice of prefilling oil filters.    As Grumpy Bear commented on keeping things clean, that I really have to wonder what the typical practice is at a dealer or any other shop that changes engine oil, do they make sure to wipe or wash off the oil plug and certainly if it fell into some gunk or onto a dirty floor, or that they wiped the filter mounting flange and didn't go and use some dirty rag and end up adding dirt to the inside of the head of the filter mount. Or be careless in how they stored or handled the new filter and if they were bumping into items under the vehicle with the filter opening facing up and having dirt drop right into the filter and if so right into the threaded center that is on the clean side. The top side, did they clean away the built up gunk that may be around the filler before removing the cap or to be really careful at that point that something right close to the filler hole that was hidden under the caps flange won't fall into the engine. Or did they clean the funnel or was that just laying there covered in oil from the oil change before and dust kicked up from sweeping the floor stuck to the oil and now that will go running into the next persons engine due to just not cleaning the funnel as "they won't know anyway" attitude as that young guy is more worried about taking a break so he can go outside and smoke a joint. Just random points that came to mind when I think about what some hired personnel may do that the shop foreman has no idea of or perhaps the whole attitude of some shops may be "eh ... who cares, they will never know the difference anyway".  
    • $3.69 for 87 octane.   $4.24 for Diesel in town.
    • On the subject of OLM, Gm's OLM tool may be more "informed" than others brands. I recall OLM's in mid-2000's Chrysler products literally counting down a set number of miles. That's all the OLM appeared to be.    I would actually expect GM to be able to explain the parameters that their OLM takes into account from a high level. No, I would not expect them to disclose their software coding or data analysis around their parameters.   So we're talking about two different topics, so to continue the subject on the other one, I'd be curious to know how much "standard particulate matter" in fresh oil is able to be filtered at first start by a fresh oil filter. How much particulate matter is enough to "matter"?   I.e. how much of a "lever" do we think this equates to (variability in particulate content, in fresh oils, between different makes/brands, some which filter less, and some that filter more).   We can say that more particles = more wear = shorter engine life as a logical statement and use that data with a little marketing to scare people into selecting a more refined/filtered oil. Using a similie, is this like deciding to forego two alcoholic drinks in a lifetime because we're worried about the potential impact on lifespan? Are there numbers which translate the ISO test results into a quantifiable increase in wear for a given engine/use case?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...