Jump to content

18 Silverado Reverse Led activate reverse camera


jonesalexryan

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi guys 

 

Searched all over the web and couldn't find an answer to this mystery wondering if anyone else experienced the same. 

 

Installed LED reverse lights a few months ago. Worked great all was well, about three weeks ago a buddy of mine had LED projection tail lights that were brighter than the ones I had to I swapped them out. Last week In the cold my reverse camera randomly came on. I figured because of snow and slush on the road water had gotten in somewhere and shorted something out. Put it in the heated garage all night let it dry out and +5 the next day it seemed to go away. However I narrowed the issue down to only happening when my headlights are on. 

 

Long story short I've determined that when I have leds in my reverse sockets the reverse camera activates all the time only when the night time lights are on. If there are no bulbs in either socket I get the same thing however when I put the stock bulbs back in the tail lights everything works fine. I cannot for the life of me figure out why this is. I thought maybe it was a bad led bulb so I put my origional LEDs in that worked for months and the camera still activates. 

 

Anyone have any idea ? My buddy has a 17 and has run led reverse lights since new without issue. 

 

For record I'm driving a Canadian 2018 Silverado LS regular cab Long box. The only other lights I have changed to led on the truck are the license plate lights and the cargo lights. I changed these the same time I converted everything three months ago so I don't think they have anything to do with it. Everything else is stock. 

 

Thanks 

  • 1 month later...
Posted

I've narrowed this down to the left marker side parking lights back feeding the reverse lights. If i remove the fuse from the left side marker lights the problem goes away. 

 

Hoping someone can shed some light on this or point me to a wiring schematic? 

 

Thanks 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • The Germans basically didn't make the list. There aren't a lot of shade-tree mechanics who work on them in general. At some point the economic equation of keeping a car alive favors junking it. Anecdote/experience tells me this is the case versus actual bad engines/engineering. Not that there isn't any, but there are definitely notable excellent examples. The 2.0 diesels will go forever and ever if one keeps the car around it running. The 2.0 gas cars eventually wear out their turbos but the block below it is usually still solid as a rock. BMW inline 6's same thing. Mercedes diesels of yesteryear, not uncommon to see 250k out of those engines, easy.     Link to the synopsis of the study: https://www.iseecars.com/longest-lasting-cars-study
    • 0w20 is recommended in the Sequoia. 0w16 in the Highlander Hybrid.   I think you make a compelling case for both the quality and frequency of maintenance but I wouldn't go so far as to plot a linear relationship between longevity and oil weight 😉   The list is interesting and leaves me with some questions. The Silverado 1500 is 12.9% likely while the GMC Sierra 1500 is only 10.8% likely. Arguably, they're the same truck, so other factors must be influencing the outcome.   The Honda Odyssey ranks #12 at 13% likely. Great. Rest assured we'll never stop hearing about the dang thing LOL.   There's a bit of a spread between the 4Runner (32.9%) and Tacoma (25.3%). Both overlap on the same 4.0 for many years although the Tacoma used a 3.5 for the last 10-12ish. I wonder if that's related to use-case or if it's suggesting the 3.5 isn't quite as up to the task, or maybe something else fails mechanically.   Ram at 3.5% overall likely, but the Ram 3500 holds the top spot on the Heavy Duty Models at 39.7%. One might say the Cummins is a ringer and provides an unfair advantage. I don't think it's fair/accurate to pit the GM Fullsize 1500's in a list with HD's which are basically medium-duty wearing a 3500 badge.   The Tahoe and Suburban hold spots #15 and #8, respectively, on the longest lasting SUV's list. What's the difference? One's got a shorter butt, unless they're also counting the 2500/3500 Suburbans in those numbers.   The GMC Canyon gets a 1.4% increase over its twin brother Colorado. Why, because it's prettier?   SO many questions...
    • Have the aftermarket system removed an re-test.  Its pretty much the only way to know if there is still an issue that is the truck and not from that.  
    • Yeah they all have break in procedures I completely ignored in the past. During tests drives I would test them out. It seems today they’re sensitive so it’s probably a good idea to follow the procedure. The other would be changing the oil more frequently in the beginning.
    • Thanks for not getting back to share your findings...  🙄
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...