Jump to content

Heads for 8.1 ?


Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm not aware of any aftermarket heads yet. Even the 500hp Marine version uses these heads. I doubt you will see any aftermarket heads until GM starts selling 496 crate engines. The 496, though similar to the 454, uses a totally different head and has 6 head bolts per cylinder, while the 454 has only 5.

 

If the marine engines can make 500hp with the stock heads, there must be a lot of room in them. Hell, if a cam will take you from 340 to 420, maybe a port and polish will yield as much.

Posted

Think about it, the stock compression is 9.1:1 which leaves a lot of room for "enhancement". So filling in the combustion chamber therefore increasing the compression ratio in conjunction with bigger valves and of course one of those three Comp Cam grinds one could easily turn these 496'ers into an absolute monster. It's simply a matter of cost.

 

They are just simply very conservatively setup from the factory.

Posted

If when and ever that GM releases the HP3 variant of the 8.1L engine we will have some decent heads. They are 100% CNC machined heads from the General. Or you can get a set of standard truck heads and have them CNC ported, but little has been done to see what works and what don't in these new engines. The 8.1 engine has porting designs similar to that of an LS1 style intake port. The exhaust ports are about the same as a performance D port big block head that we are all familiar with.

 

The key to making horsepower is that everything, heads, intake, cam and compression ratio work well in harmony with one another. You don't want a set of heads that flow very well in the .500" lift region and up and select a cam with a maximum lift of .450"

 

GM did their homework with the HP3 variant of the 8.1L engine. At only 9.0:1 compression that 8.1L is producing over 525Hp and over 560ft/lbs of torque all on 87 octane pump fuel! Talk about things working in harmony :D This engine has about a half point lower compression than the 502/502 engine with aluminum heads and a high rise intake and carburetor with a lumpy cam. I am sure that there is plenty of potential just waiting to be unleashed. Hmm perhaps about 10 PSI of boost would wake it up to say.....650 or 700 HP? :rolleyes:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.6k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    343,007
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Brendan C
    Newest Member
    Brendan C
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,137 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • The oil filter has NOTHING To do with oil leak. GM sources parts from 1,000's of vendors and as with anything mass produced, flaws are unavoidable.    Putting a larger oil filter will do nothing but satisfy emotions. The OEM filter is designed for the engine and perfectly capable of handling the demands on the engine. Oversize oil filter could result in reduced flow and overall lower oil pressure.
    • You're better read than that Atlas. 😏   British science fiction writer Arthur C. Clarke formulated three adages that are known as Clarke's three laws, of which the third law – that "any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic" – is the best known and most widely cited.   Stribeck and the pivotable Hersey Number isn't voodoo nor snake oil. That part is physics. It's what marketing and bean counters do with it that is snake oil and voodoo.    Stribeck is the relationship between Hersey and the Coefficient of Friction. Within the Hersey Equation if viscosity and viscosity is 'Dependent' on.......heat.......and.......viscosity index or the temperature to viscosity slope.    Specifically Hersey is the viscosity AT THE TEMPERATURE IN THAT LOCATION FOR THAT SLOPE.   Hydrodynamic lubrication exist when the film thickness in the location is 3X the Ra roughness of the surface. This is irrespective of the hardness of the substrate. To obtain that thickness X viscosity is required for Y velocity at Z load. That's a lot of moving parts. It is also impossible to maintain in an ICE but nearly possible with a turbine under constant load.    What does that mean? Error heavy and operate light. Wear is inevitable but the rate of wear and the milage obtainable are a function of prevailing conditions and HABITS. The only penalty is viscous drag and at fractions so low as to be well worth the effort. Double the life, half the manufacturing carbon foot print. Greed is the only impediment.    The materials generated by SwRI are the RESULT not an estimation or a hypothesis.    Don't delude yourself sir, EV's have as many pitfalls as ICE's. We just don't know what they are yet and it will take longer to sort as MARKETING and GREEDY CEO's have had more time to polish the turd they are selling. 
    • You can always count on greed to prey on ignorance and stupidity.    Friend bought a 2019 Ford Flex and asked me about using Valvoline R&P 5W30 in it. Told him give the miles on it and the fact it wasn't yet using oil that it was a good plan. He uses a Valvoline quick change shop for his oil service.   First they tell him that isn't the oil the OEM recommends. He told them he didn't care what the OEM thought. Then they floated the, "But it will void your warranty"    His reply was it's a 2019, there is no warranty and informed them their knowledge of the law was lacking.    Then they tell him 'But it will ruin your motor"!.    Mine to ruin he says. Finally they give in and charge him 150% the semi-syn price    Point it the brainwash is so embedded that even the service industry is drunk on their swill. The public is right behind them. Echoing the same lies on every forum and media platform. If the end goal is indeed EV then I'd say that ship is about built. 
    • Diesel hit $6.00 here today at the truck stop.   Payed $2.79 for E85 today too.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...