Jump to content

Tailgate up or down


tmf6902

Recommended Posts

Posted

I found this on the web...supposedly it's from some GM techs.....

 

I for one never drive with it down, unless I have to, I don't like it bouncing around back there, and I think it looks dumb....and let's face it, what's an extra .1-.3 miles per gallon. Just my opinion though.

 

Better milage with tailgate UP!!!

 

The physics of that sound pretty solid to me....especially when you have leaves in the back....they just tumble around back there.

 

TMF :withstupid:

Posted

Very interesting....

 

After a similar debate with some co-workers about 10 years ago, we did an experiment.

 

I used my old ('92) S-10, it was a regular cab with the S-10 version of a 'long' bed. If I ran with the tailgate up, my mileage went down unless I had something in the bed that would 'fill the space' (like the air bubble that was mentioned) . If I ran with the tailgate down, (empty bed) my mileage would go up.

 

A friend of mine with the same truck, except a short bed, had exactly the opposite results: gate up, mileage up, gate down, mileage down. A third co-worker with the same truck had the long bed but with the extended cab, the effects on his mileage fell in between the two of ours.

 

It was not scientific, but was observable.

 

In my current truck, it is exactly the opposite, best mileage is with the tailgate up.

 

bummed.

Posted

This is another one of my pet peeves.

 

 

IMO, Pickups look kinda half-a$$ed (sorry for the pun) without the tailgate up (Or if the tailgate's missing for that matter. Plus, it's kinda dangerous to drive around with the tailgate down for no reason. Hazard to other motorists. :jester:

Posted

You mean I don't get optimal mileage driving around like this? d**n!

 

P8210002.JPG

 

I leave it up not because of mileage reasons, but to add support to the bed sides. We've all seen the old ones with the sides flapping in the breeze due to busted welds.

Posted

The Ranger gets 20 +/- MPG, so I can't complain about MPG anyway, but no, I don't leave the tail gate down unless there is something there too big to close it.

Posted

Hmmm. Think there's a connection to the tailgate issue in teh Light Duty forum? :jester:

 

Maybe leaving the tailgate down is bad for the cables also.

Posted
You mean I don't get optimal mileage driving around like this? d**n!

 

P8210002.JPG

 

I leave it up not because of mileage reasons, but to add support to the bed sides. We've all seen the old ones with the sides flapping in the breeze due to busted welds.

:jester::lol::D Yes that is giving you to best milage. :puke::puke::puke:

Posted

I remember reading a study that was done at an east coast engineering school (don't remember which one, but it wasn't my alma mater, RPI). Anyway, they tried a bunch of configurations on a Dodge 1/2 ton and I believe that this is how it came out:

Best............................................................................

........................ Worst

Triangluar shaped cap > standard cap > hard tonneau > soft tonneau > gate down> gate up

 

I may have read it somewhere linked from a post here, but it was probably two years ago....

 

YMMV

Posted

I don't doubt that university study at all, but it will be valid for that particular vehicle only. Aerodynamics is much more complex than people thought back in the 30's when the art-deco and swoopy vehicle craze was big. Things that look streamlined aren't necessarily aerodynamically efficient and suble alterations around edges and the length and curve of surfaces can have dramatic effects.

Posted
Aerodynamics is much more complex than people thought back in the 30's when the art-deco and swoopy vehicle craze was big.  Things that look streamlined aren't necessarily aerodynamically efficient and suble alterations around edges and the length and curve of surfaces can have dramatic effects.

How true. I just finished building a kart to race on a 2.02 miles track. With a 3000' straight aerodynamics is key. All my friends can understand how this thing is aerodynamic with that huge nose.

 

Picture%20234.jpg

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Certainly as the new model year comes along and that may mean a new refreshed model such as for example the upcoming 2027 half tons and lets just say for arguments sake that current year trucks are in decent supply on the new lot and its not guaranteed but some years and depending on the current economic state that buyers may turn their nose up at the so called old stock/old model and want the "new new" shiny object. When those stars align and in this case GM corporate puts out a great discount on what is becoming the old stock as well as dealers willing to deal to get that inventory off the lot, that's when it would be easier to deal as long as, as it was pointed out that your willing to take what is there for choice of inventory in an area that makes sense to you shopping wise. What you don't get deals on or typically so is the incoming new toy in the showroom, that is where if they don't have much inventory of the new model year and customers that are willing to pay to beat the Joneses and will pay top dollar for it just because. Also sometimes there is that vehicle that few are interested in for whatever reason in how its equipped that becomes two years old and they really want to get rid of that vehicle. New in all cases and warranty the same typically although plan on changing that battery out on the older used one, lot rot of batteries with todays vehicles that draw power constantly.    I too was just too leery about buying a newer used truck as I know how all too many seem to treat their vehicle maintenance wise and up here in Canada there wasn't the used market to choose from like one would assume because of all the bull crap going on with under a year old trucks and under certain mileage being bought up by USA brokers and being hauled/driven south to be sold in the sates so the used price was too demanding here. Also a certain insurance coverage I wanted was only available on a new truck at time of purchase and not even a so called new demo on a lot could have that no depreciation loss coverage. I made the best deal I could on a truck I personally chose for options on an order so they knew it was most likely sold before it ever hit their lot so no lot interest charges for the dealer to swallow. I also wanted a new vehicle so that I could plaster the crap out of it underneath with fluid film and see if that will help slow down the rust issues we have here due to the crap they spread on the winter roads. 
    • Sure...but there is no "update" to be had.  GM has not issued any support for this.  
    • You mean it's not supported yet in the trucks. The hardware is certainly there. The software just needs updated.
    • Is the carbon pro bed still a thing? I figured it was one of those things that quietly disappeared from low take rate.   I thought Chevrolet tried adding it too...   Minimal.   Despite all the 'all new' versions since GMT-800, lots of parts still swap from generation to generation.   I've seen a bunch of GMT-800s with a K2 rear bumper on them. 
    • We still haven't seen the GMC's. I expect the Chevys to more orr less match the Fords, but with no all aluminum body and simple SBC, be significantly more affordable. I'm hoping GMC offers the 6.7 engine and lays it all out on the line. My main question? More premium GMC's already use composite leads out back. Does Chevy get any? What other frame/suspension changes?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...