Jump to content

Year in Review: DEI


Elwood

Recommended Posts

Posted

Year in Review: DEI

 

By Lee Montgomery, Turner Sports Interactive

Wednesday, December 03, 2003

 

 

This is why Dale Earnhardt started a NASCAR Winston Cup team.

 

 

For the first time in Dale Earnhardt Inc.'s brief history, one of its drivers contended for the championship while another raced in the top 10 most of the year.

 

Earnhardt would've been proud. The team that bears his name was a force all season, beginning with Michael Waltrip's Daytona 500 victory and ending with Dale Earnhardt Jr. finishing third in the points standings.

 

 

In between, Earnhardt Jr. battled for the championship all year and won twice, including a non-restrictor plate victory at Phoenix. Waltrip stayed in the top 10 in the points until a late-season fade and also won twice.

 

 

DEI's third team didn't fare so well, as three drivers combined to post two top-10 finishes, and the No. 1 car finished 30th in the points.

 

 

Interestingly, DEI's season mirrored another three-car Chevrolet team, Richard Childress Racing: one team competed for the championship (Kevin Harvick, Earnhardt Jr.), another won two races and finished outside the top 10 in points (Robby Gordon, Waltrip), and the third team changed drivers and struggled all year (RCR's No. 30 and DEI's No. 1).

 

 

Earnhardt Jr., though, was clearly the star of DEI in 2003. His popularity off it is undisputed, but his on-track performance lived up to expectations. He led 24 of the 36 races, a feat matched only by super-fast Ryan Newman.

 

 

Earnhardt Jr. led the most laps in four races, none of which he won. He didn't win a pole, but his 13 top-five and 21 top-10 finishes were each career highs.

 

 

"The team is really getting better and better," Earnhardt Jr. said. "We seem to be growing more comfortable. We stumble a little bit under pressure, not only just driving in races and being in the front and trying to make good pit stops, but we've got a high-profile team and a high-profile sponsor.

 

 

"If we overcome the pressure from that, we're doing a good job.

 

 

"I feel like the team is getting better and that we can compete next year for the championship. The only thing I don't like about Winston Cup racing right now that could hamper my ability to be as competitive next year is loyalty.

 

 

"I feel like I have a pretty good group of guys, and if they maintain their strong bond and loyalty for what we're trying to accomplish, then we can step it up again and again each year. I hope everybody understands the opportunities we have and that they stick around to make it happen."

 

 

Earnhardt Jr. wanted his No. 8 team to step up this season, and it did. After a slow start to the season -- 36th at Daytona and 33rd at Rockingham -- Junior took off.

 

 

He led the most laps and finished second at Las Vegas, was third at Atlanta and led the most laps and finished sixth at Darlington.

 

 

After a mediocre race at Bristol, Earnhardt came in second at Texas, won his fourth consecutive race at Talladega and led the most laps and finished third at Martinsville. The Talladega race moved him to second in the points, where he stayed for 19 of the 29 remaining weeks.

 

 

The good runs kept piling up: a third at Richmond, a fourth at Pocono, another third at Pocono, a third at Watkins Glen and a fifth at New Hampshire after leading the most laps. Crashes at Chicago, Michigan and Dover hampered his championship aspirations, but the team kept plugging.

 

 

Junior didn't make it five in a row at Talladega, but he finished second to Waltrip there. A fourth-place result at Martinsville cemented his place as the best short track driver, as he scored more points at the three short tracks than anyone.

 

 

Then came the victory at Phoenix, his first non-plate victory in two years. A 13th at Rockingham and a 24th at Homestead closed the season, but Earnhardt Jr. still had a productive year.

 

 

"It feels like the last day of school," Earnhardt Jr. said of Homestead. "I'm goin' home to celebrate. We were never very good today, but third-place in points is something I'm really proud of.

 

 

"It shows what a great season we had, how much we improved as a team and how we were able to run competitively week-after-week, a lot more consistent than before. We wanted to win the championship, but third is something we can really build on."

 

 

Waltrip briefly led points standings

 

 

Waltrip has something on which to build, too, even though he fell to 15th in the final Winston Cup points standings. Waltrip was solid if not spectacular for most of the season, starting with his second Daytona 500 victory.

 

 

After a third-place at Las Vegas, Waltrip led the points. That last only one race, but Waltrip stayed near the front most of the season. First-half highlights were a solid fifth at Darlington, seventh at California, sixth at Charlotte and fifth at Michigan.

 

 

He stood fifth in the points after a fifth-place finish at Chicagoland. But after a seventh-place result at Michigan, the bottom fell out. Waltrip crashed at Bristol and ended up 42nd. The next four races ended with Waltrip 26th or worse, including a blown engine at Dover that dropped him out of the top 10 in points.

 

 

Talladega briefly arrested the free-fall, as Waltrip led 16 laps and won his fourth career race - all on superspeedways. But he crashed at Kansas and blew another engine at Atlanta.

 

 

Waltrip briefly rebounded with a fifth at Phoenix, but he blew up at Rockingham and cut a tire and crashed at Homestead. Still, his two victories were a career high, as were his eight top-fives.

 

 

Third DEI team endures rough campaign

 

 

Steve Park started the season as Earnhardt's and Waltrip's teammate but was let go after 11 races and only one top-10 finish. Jeff Green replaced Park in the No. 1 but didn't much better. John Andretti finished the season in the car, which blew up in the season's final race.

 

 

The only other top 10 the car had all season was at Infineon Raceway, when road racer Ron Fellows drove it to seventh.

 

 

But it wasn't all bad news, of course. Besides DEI's Winston Cup teams, the Chance 2 Motorsports team owned by Earnhardt Jr. and Teresa Earnhardt competed in 11 Busch Series races, winning three - all by Earnhardt Jr., including a dominant race at Daytona in July when he led every lap.

 

 

Now that's something to build on.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,960
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    doylej24
    Newest Member
    doylej24
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 744 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I tried before I updated the scan tool just incase an update messed it up, but it never worked so I updated the scan tool and it still didn't work.   Only difference is I click on Sierra not Chevrolet cause I have a Sierra.   If I click on 2026-2024 I didn't have any option to change placard, when I click on 2023 it does give me the option but when I try to do it,.it says vehicle not supported!   I have my region or market or whatever it is set to America I think, is that what yours is set to?
    • Its just that it worked on 2024 trucks on this forum and my 2025 model truck, unless GM did something since that point to screw up access or Autel has a bad update. I haven't had need to use my tool since last year when I did the changes to the placard pressure settings and since then I updated the software on my Autel but have not plugged into the OBD so hard to say if I would get a surprise as well.    All I know last year when I bought the Autel I was warned to be sure to update it before I tried using the unit as they said who knows how long ago unit itself was actually manufactured as the software could be way out of date. 
    • And so you had gone through the process of registering and updating the tool and so on ?. All I can say is that on the front page as the tool fires up you go to advanced mode, then vehicle model comes up and you choose Silverado ( not the DRW or EV  since your a single rear wheel ) , then I think its choice 2 which is 07/2021 - 12/2026 ( 433mhz 13542523 ) as that is the series of tpms sensors and then go down to choice 5 which is tire type/pressure selection. Hit yes and it says to connect to OBD port and turn ignition on.    Having said this, I updated the software in my tool lately and these year range choices look different from the past due to them doing some updates it would appear and I have not connected up to the OBD port since last year so hopefully I am not in for a surprise with them screwing up the software and that it won't work on my truck anymore either.    So my question is, when you plugged into the OBD and started your truck it had that message on the Autel screen "vehicle not supported" ?. That does seem odd as tire shops would be pissed right off if hey can't use their tool on the model year after mine that in theory is supposed to be much the same truck ... unless GM did some change in the computer system to block certain things from access. 
    • Understanding and using modern scan tools is its own body of knowledge. I had little hope that would work...programming access to the BCM is probably required and that is not easy for us consumers. Expensive scan tool, GM programming subscription, online authentication, etc.   It also may be a matter of finding the right dealer to program it for you. Flashing a modern BCM might be a little too advanced for most tire shops.
    • Update for anyone following:    Installed everything as shown in diagram. Opted for 8 AWG from Battery Positive to a 50A resettable inline breaker. 8 AWG is tied into to 2x 12 AWG wires feeding a 6 way fuse bus in parallel (manufacturer’s design of what I purchased).    4 of the 6 fuses available for circuits are tied to terminal 30 of each relay. I tied a jumper from one of my spare circuits off the bus to terminal 86 of each relay. The trigger, terminal 85, was pulled from my interior by way of T-Taps from the X61A-X5 pins 10, 11, 17 and 23. This was the hardest part of the job. Even with the X61A unbolted and the X5 removed - there was VERY little wiggle room.  I added back up lights that I want to come on with my cargo lamp - but when I would check continuity between S48A-X1 pin 18 to its respective landing point on the X61A-X5 it triggers the factory relay… Instead I opted for a add-a-fuse on the passenger interior fuse panel (fuse location 10 - cargo lamp) and ran it through the boot on the driver side to my load. Did this to avoid introducing any electrical gremlins.   Note: Please check for continuity between the S48A-X1 and the X61A-X5. In my case wire colours were not the same as other’s who have posted. To do a continuity check you need a Multimeter. Completely disassemble the S48A-X1 and remove the brown face plate off the X61A-X5 by way of a flat head screwdriver - this was the only way I could get any results.   The outputs, terminal 87 of the relays, were fed into a junction box and landed at Individual studs and were labelled Aux 1-4.    At this point, all you need to do is run wire to your loads and bring them to ground. I created a negative bus in the engine bay, all my negatives land here.    For anyone having issues with all of your new aux switch lights coming on with the press of one - I noticed this only to be an issue when the battery wasn’t hooked up to my relays? No idea why, but it was quickly corrected by having my system buttoned up and functional.     
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...