Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I just bought a 2001 Suburban 2500 2WD with the 8.1L and the 4L80e.  She came from an impound auction and the PO had the steering column hotwired and busted.  She had the check engine light on with 4 codes for the transmission.  One of them was p1860 and I forget the rest.  When driving in D she starts off fine in first gear, but holds it to about 4k rpm or until you just lightly ease off the gas.  She also hesitates just slightly engaging into reverse.  So I read that a faulty ignition switch could trigger those trans codes, so I replaced the column and put a new ignition switch in.  The check engine light is gone, but she still does the same thing holding first.  All other gears are fine and she shifts through the other gears no problem, still hesitates engaging reverse though.  I changed the trans fluid and filter, still same exact thing.  

I just bought a transmission pressure tester and will check that.  If anyone has any suggestions on what to look for I would appreciate it. 

 

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

I have thrown parts at this trans and it is still doing the same exact thing.  I got a line pressure gauge and tested it.  At idle in P, N or D it would be at 40 psi, once I gave it a little throttle it would jump up to 90.  When I drove it, it would get up to 130 +- 20.  Reverse in idle was 60, but once I gave a little throttle it would jump up to 100+.  Hard to get good reverse pulls monitoring the gauge, but it seemed reverse would go above 150 psi pretty easily while driving it.

So I figured I would replace the valve body with a remanufactured one using the transgo upgrades.  She still does the exact same thing.  Holds first until about 4k rpm and shifts hard.  All other gears shift fine, maybe a little harsh, but all at the right range. Reverse takes a couple of seconds to engage.  Absolutely no slipping at all.

Also, last night when I got home from a 30 mile drive I pulled forward to parallel park, when I put it in reverse, she stalled.  I started her back up and went backwards and parked.  She spewed tranny fluid out of the dipstick and made a mess.  I have checked the fluid when hot and had her exactly where it should be.  

Next I have ordered the speed input sensor.  The only other thing I can think of is internal issues like the pump, which I am hoping to avoid. I really don't want to rebuild this trans, but I have rebuilt a couple of 4l60e's.

Any help would be appreciated.

 

  • 11 months later...
Posted (edited)

What did t find out? I am having that exact same issue w the 1st gear 4k shifting.

Edited by 1968Gmc4wd

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Thanks - I wasn't quite caffeinated this morning. 2:1 makes sense, turning the crankshaft 360 degrees will turn the cam 180 degrees, and had I done that, the cam's dot would be at 6 and the crank's at 12 again.   I went ahead and took the sprocket off anyway, aligned everything dot-to-dot including the balance shaft just for s&g. I'm glad I did because I discovered no Loctite on the timing sprocket bolts. Maybe it's not required, but at only 20 ft-lb torque spec, those bolts aren't in there very tight. Cleaned and reassembled with some thread locker and torqued.   A general observation: Less is more with RTV. If a little doesn't stop a leak, a LOT probably won't, either. RTV is thinly veiled revenge, in a tube...      
    • The timing marks are ok, that is #1, you can turn it over until they line up and it won't change anything, the crankshaft turns twice for every camshaft revolution, I have always set up SB Chevs as your pic shows using a straight edge
    • Someone's been here before.... There is a receipt for a 3-piece timing set, purchased earlier this year.   Is this picture something, or, nothing?   I have the timing cover off and my crank is perfectly TDC and the keyed gear's locating mark is dead on 12 o'clock.   The cam gear locating mark is also at 12 o'clock. Now, I'm not an expert, but all the install guides say the two locating marks should meet and be perfectly aligned when installing a timing set. The mark on the crank should be dead on 12:00 and the cam gear's mark should be dead on 6:00, and both marks should be perfectly vertically aligned.   I believe the timing gear is keyed or has a dowel that ensures it can only be installed on the cam in one position, so I have to believe the cam is out of phase somehow. At the very least, with a triangular bolt pattern, it can only be installed in one of 3 different positions.   Before I pulled the front cover, the truck was running alright, no service engine soon lights except an occasional P0172 / rich condition. Timing -16 timing at idle (should be +16), and total -35% fuel trim, two conditions I haven't been able to figure out.   In related news, my injector tested pretty well, wasn't leaking, but I had it rebuilt anyway, and it's on it's way back to me.         Along with this discovery, the good and bad:   Good: The oil pan seal appears undamaged.   Bad: -The timing cover has been reused, and the positioning dowels have been broken. That could explain some of the leaking. -Some kind of white paste or grease was used to try to seal the oil pan seal and timing cover (since wiped off..). -Then, someone globbed silicone all over the front of the cover and also buried the ckp sensor in it. But, they didn't put any inside the cover or use RTV to try to seal the oil pan seal with the timing cover (good).
    • The guy that owns K&P filters last I checked in with him has over 300,000 miles on his Dodge base Hemi using his own 35 micron absolute stainless mesh filter from its first oil change.    The GM study I've posted a dozen times shows the relationship in engine life based in multiples of base units, not miles or years. That is the base unit is the number of miles the motor ran using the reference filter efficiency.    The above two paragraphs dismantle anecdotal arguments IF one changes oil often enough to prevent particle formation and the motor is in otherwise good shape. That is not full of silica (no air filter) or suffering a metallurgical issue that is not part of the lubrication discussion. Poor heat treat in example.   Data from UOA's I've reviewed from more than a few engines can show remarkably broad variations in oil cleanliness using the exact same filter over the course of an engines life.     Lastly there is the common sense of it. Wear debris WILL circulate the engine BEFORE it ever sees a filter in route to that filter and WILL harm the pump which NEVER sees filtered oil.    Alpha question then becomes, given the facts, how long do you believe is a reasonable service life from a vehicle you are certain you will not pass down? That is the junk yard will be it's resting place when you're done with it? (the moral issue most don't care about).    Omega question is then how diligent are you prepared to be in general mechanical, air & oil maintenance? Preventing particulates and keeping them sufficiently dilute; preventing the precursors from generation, amalgamation and precipitation.    If I get a good look at the engine bay of a vehicle I have a fair idea of the owners commitment to the inside of the power train. That 30 micron WIX is still more efficient than a sieve.                 
    • It also depends on what criteria someone is using for “best” when talking filters.  Are we going off best efficiency?   Best quality/QC?  Etc. because the two may not mutually exclusive.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...