Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

A few people were interested in a video to hear how the new 3.0L LM2 sounds with an aftermarket intake on in. So here you go. 

 

2021 Silverado 3.0L LM2

S&B Intake

~40 degrees outside temp

 

https://youtu.be/gJ7BKyQOYfU

(I'm no youtuber, so please be nice about the quality)

 

This is with the full kit installed, and the box plug left out like the instructions. 

 

Very noticeable idle air noise, part throttle turbo whistle, and zero throttle deceleration air noise. I was very surprised by how it sounds, never quite had an intake sound like this. I do like it a lot. Wide open throttle wont get much out of it but the part throttle around 2000rpm is where it hits a sweet spot. There is a loud zero throttle air rushing noise that's always there on deceleration, i find it cool but some could be annoyed by it to be honest. 

Edited by Lucely Engineered
Posted
2 hours ago, Lucely Engineered said:

A few people were interested in a video to hear how the new 3.0L LM2 sounds with an aftermarket intake on in. So here you go. 

 

2021 Silverado 3.0L LM2

S&B Intake

~40 degrees outside temp

 

https://youtu.be/gJ7BKyQOYfU

(I'm no youtuber, so please be nice about the quality)

 

This is with the full kit installed, and the box plug left out like the instructions. 

 

Very noticeable idle air noise, part throttle turbo whistle, and zero throttle deceleration air noise. I was very surprised by how it sounds, never quite had an intake sound like this. I do like it a lot. Wide open throttle wont get much out of it but the part throttle around 2000rpm is where it hits a sweet spot. There is a loud zero throttle air rushing noise that's always there on deceleration, i find it cool but some could be annoyed by it to be honest. 

I think it sounds pretty good, almost like an old school military deuce and a half type sound as I think they were inline 6 engines.

 

you notice any difference in performance or increase/decrease in mpg’s?

Posted
11 hours ago, Pswa320 said:

I think it sounds pretty good, almost like an old school military deuce and a half type sound as I think they were inline 6 engines.

 

you notice any difference in performance or increase/decrease in mpg’s?

Performance wise id like to think it feels like it pulls harder, but honestly i only had 400 miles on it before doing this so my butt-dyno isnt very calibrated. And i dont do much WOT until the truck had some miles on it.

 

As for mileage Thats hard to judge right now too, because we just went through a terrible February for weather, so 50% of the run time was remote start. 

Posted

Will be interesting to see how the mpg’s are affected. Engine breathing better so it should improve but will be hard to determine in the short term with everyone looking for the power increase. Lots of start and stop and heavy pedal by most right after install so numbers won’t be accurate right away.

Posted
8 minutes ago, Pswa320 said:

Will be interesting to see how the mpg’s are affected. Engine breathing better so it should improve but will be hard to determine in the short term with everyone looking for the power increase. Lots of start and stop and heavy pedal by most right after install so numbers won’t be accurate right away.

Just saw your thread on this, i might just delete this one and move to yours. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,759 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...