Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I see a lot of threads on this topic but I can't quite pinpoint which tow mirrors to get for my AT4.

Both my mirrors are currently busted (don't ask...), although the electronics work well.

They are fully loaded, cameras/lane keeping/blind spot/auto folding/etc.

Which tow mirrors fit the fully loaded AT4?

 

These seem to lack many of the features I currently have:

 

https://accessories.gmc.com/product/extended-view-tow-mirrors-in-black-84776098?year=2020&make=GMC&model=Sierra 1500&modelId=548&body=Crew Cab Pickup&bodyId=22&wheel=Short Box&wheelId=651&trim=Elevation&trimId=5103&drive=4WD&driveId=8&engine=5.3L V8 GAS&engineId=2059&bodyNumDoors=5&categoryId=98023


Thank you!

Posted

Following, interested in this as well.  When I asked the dealer during the purchase process they said I would have to give up some of the functionality if I wanted these.  

Posted (edited)
26 minutes ago, Bernardo Fanti said:

I see a lot of threads on this topic but I can't quite pinpoint which tow mirrors to get for my AT4.

Both my mirrors are currently busted (don't ask...), although the electronics work well.

They are fully loaded, cameras/lane keeping/blind spot/auto folding/etc.

Which tow mirrors fit the fully loaded AT4?

 

These seem to lack many of the features I currently have:

 

https://accessories.gmc.com/product/extended-view-tow-mirrors-in-black-84776098?year=2020&make=GMC&model=Sierra 1500&modelId=548&body=Crew Cab Pickup&bodyId=22&wheel=Short Box&wheelId=651&trim=Elevation&trimId=5103&drive=4WD&driveId=8&engine=5.3L V8 GAS&engineId=2059&bodyNumDoors=5&categoryId=98023


Thank you!

 

Those won't work because of all the features in your mirrors now (cameras, blind spot and folding).  If you put those on the truck would have a fit and you'll get nothing but warning messages.

 

You'd have to order each tow mirror (and most likely new door harnesses) individually for a truck that matches your build but that came with tow mirrors.

 

The label with the VIN in your driver's door jamb (not the tow label) should show a MM/YY build timeframe on it.  Any chance you can get that and post it?

 

 

Edited by newdude
Posted
21 hours ago, newdude said:

The label with the VIN in your driver's door jamb (not the tow label) should show a MM/YY build timeframe on it.  Any chance you can get that and post it

 

 

Couldn't see a MM/YY build timeframe anywhere on it, the VIN is 1gtu9eetxlz259649, I imagine I can call up the dealer and get more info / part numbers for those...

Posted
30 minutes ago, Bernardo Fanti said:

 

Couldn't see a MM/YY build timeframe anywhere on it, the VIN is 1gtu9eetxlz259649, I imagine I can call up the dealer and get more info / part numbers for those...

 

Hopefully the pockets are deep...

 

84655845 and 84655846 are the door harnesses needed.  Those retail for about $150 each.  84879427 and 84879428 are the DQS mirrors with all the same features your small ones have.  84879428 is on national backorder right now as well.  The mirrors retail for about $1287 EACH. 

 

No 100% on all of the mirror lights working so the front marker/signal and the rear facing spot lamp but everything else will as far as power fold, glass and cameras.  The harnesses will complete the lights circuit but the BCM might need custom programing from White Auto Media Services (WAMS) to turn on the operations for the lights.  

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
58 minutes ago, newdude said:

 

Hopefully the pockets are deep...

 

84655845 and 84655846 are the door harnesses needed.  Those retail for about $150 each.  84879427 and 84879428 are the DQS mirrors with all the same features your small ones have.  84879428 is on national backorder right now as well.  The mirrors retail for about $1287 EACH. 

 

No 100% on all of the mirror lights working so the front marker/signal and the rear facing spot lamp but everything else will as far as power fold, glass and cameras.  The harnesses will complete the lights circuit but the BCM might need custom programing from White Auto Media Services (WAMS) to turn on the operations for the lights.  

 

 

Damn! I didn't expect this - thank you so much for the help identifying those part numbers.

 

Also - DAMN, that's expensive. Hah. I was quoted nearly $2000 to fix/replace my current mirrors, despite the fact that the folding/camera all work, so I was considering replacing them entirely with tow mirrors. But that's a $3500 investment for marginal gain.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
    • Just don't turn the steering wheel as much?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...