Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Good day everyone, 

 

About 4 months ago purchased a 2008 Silverado 1500 5.3 LY5 vin J . The prior owner had put a 2011 5.3 LC9 in the truck as the original LY5 had blown.  One day I noticed the engine acted as if it was stalling on sudden deceleration. To my surprise the the long term fuel trims were -16.7 % at idle sometimes ranging as high as -21% 
I went through the DTC for PO172 and PO175 . Suffice to say all of the parameters were passed. No exhaust restriction, no vacuum leaks, MAF reading is correct, receiving proper fuel pressure 43 PSI, injector resistance was 14 ohms on all but one injector at 13.9 ohms. O2 sensors are good. 
The only reading that is severely wrong is the MAP which reads 25.1 in Hg. I live nearly at sea level normally Barometric pressure is 29 in Hg here. 
I replaced the MAP sensor and the reading went to 24.8 , the pigtail for the sensor is spliced into the harness. 
I went through PO 106 all of the circuits tested normal 
*[ less than 5 ohms between low ref and ground] - reading was 0L 

*[ignition on 4.8 -5.2 volts between 5 volt ref and ground] - reading was 5.12

*[MAP sensor harness unplugged must read less than 12 kPa] - reading 10kPa

*[install 3A fused jumper wire between signal and 5 volt ref must read above 103 kPa] - Reading was above 103 kPa

signal circuit passed short to ground test

Found the pins on the ECM connector for the MAP pigtail. I tested for continuity between both ends for 5 volt, ground, and signal. All three had continuity. 
This lead the DTC106 instructions to say replace ECM which I did. The problem still happens. 

The check engine light has yet to come on

 

Which leads to my questions
1. Is there a major difference between the 2008 MAP sensor and the 2011 and where to go with diagnosing why the MAP reading is wrong key on engine off.

2. The LC9 engine used flex fuel 37 lb injectors where as the LY5 used 30 lb, upon looking at the injectors in my truck i believe he kept the flex fuel injectors on the LC9 and that is part of my fuel issue. What injectors should i replace them with the stock LY5 injectors Part#217-1621?

Any advice or ideas of how to proceed is much appreciated. 

 

Posted

Yes, the MAP sensor is different between a 2008 and 2011. The switch over was in 2009-2010 to the later style sensor. The linear and offset settings are much different between the two.

 

If the injectors are indeed different size, then yes you need to change them back or tune the computer. A tune can fix both of these issues if you owned HP Tuners or knew someone that did.

Posted

Thank you Cam GTP!

 

Okay so even though the MAP sensor pigtail is spliced into the 08 engine harness the ECM settings for the map need to be reset? 

Posted

Correct. I am going off memory here but in the calibration the 2008 sensor is 94/10.3 for the linear/offset and the 2011 is 121/-0.31 for the settings. Even though the harness pigtail was swapped the calibration is still running the 2008 sensor settings if it was not tuned.

 

If tuning isn't something you can do you can just swap the sensor and pins around in the pigtail as well as swap back to the other injectors.

  • 2 years later...
Posted
On 5/12/2021 at 7:35 PM, Jonathan Motloch said:

Good day everyone, 

 

About 4 months ago purchased a 2008 Silverado 1500 5.3 LY5 vin J . The prior owner had put a 2011 5.3 LC9 in the truck as the original LY5 had blown.  One day I noticed the engine acted as if it was stalling on sudden deceleration. To my surprise the the long term fuel trims were -16.7 % at idle sometimes ranging as high as -21% 
I went through the DTC for PO172 and PO175 . Suffice to say all of the parameters were passed. No exhaust restriction, no vacuum leaks, MAF reading is correct, receiving proper fuel pressure 43 PSI, injector resistance was 14 ohms on all but one injector at 13.9 ohms. O2 sensors are good. 
The only reading that is severely wrong is the MAP which reads 25.1 in Hg. I live nearly at sea level normally Barometric pressure is 29 in Hg here. 
I replaced the MAP sensor and the reading went to 24.8 , the pigtail for the sensor is spliced into the harness. 
I went through PO 106 all of the circuits tested normal 
*[ less than 5 ohms between low ref and ground] - reading was 0L 

*[ignition on 4.8 -5.2 volts between 5 volt ref and ground] - reading was 5.12

*[MAP sensor harness unplugged must read less than 12 kPa] - reading 10kPa

*[install 3A fused jumper wire between signal and 5 volt ref must read above 103 kPa] - Reading was above 103 kPa

signal circuit passed short to ground test

Found the pins on the ECM connector for the MAP pigtail. I tested for continuity between both ends for 5 volt, ground, and signal. All three had continuity. 
This lead the DTC106 instructions to say replace ECM which I did. The problem still happens. 

The check engine light has yet to come on

 

Which leads to my questions
1. Is there a major difference between the 2008 MAP sensor and the 2011 and where to go with diagnosing why the MAP reading is wrong key on engine off.

2. The LC9 engine used flex fuel 37 lb injectors where as the LY5 used 30 lb, upon looking at the injectors in my truck i believe he kept the flex fuel injectors on the LC9 and that is part of my fuel issue. What injectors should i replace them with the stock LY5 injectors Part#217-1621?

Any advice or ideas of how to proceed is much appreciated. 

 

Seems as though the pcm is trying to do its job properly to trim the excess fuel.  I would change the injectors as they are either wrong sizing or have been capped for larger fuel capacity. I had same issues with my lc9 engine.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.3k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,732
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    user087
    Newest Member
    user087
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 1 Anonymous, 818 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • This doesn't look like a GM truck. Not needed on a HD truck
    • It varies a ton around me. Some places are still at $5.00 or higher and others are way down into the $4's.   Offroad diesel was $4.02 at the one station I passed today.
    • So after reading the reveal from Chevrolet, I kept asking myself...why did the trim levels change?   Here are the official ones:   Work Truck (WT): The quintessential fleet truck, built with durable, easy-to-clean interiors for commercial or utilitarian use. Custom: A stylish, road-oriented trim that adds a more refined appearance, standard dual exhaust, and modern exterior styling. Custom Trail Boss: An entry-level off-roader featuring a 2-inch factory suspension lift and 34-inch mud-terrain tires on a budget. Silverado: Serving as the new base consumer truck (replacing the previous LT trim), it comes standard with the Z71 off-road package when equipped with 4WD. Trail Boss: Steps up the off-road hardware with the 2-inch lift, 34-inch tires, monotube shocks, an exclusive off-road hood, and more premium interior options. ZR2: The flagship off-roader. It boasts 35-inch mud-terrain tires, Multimatic DSSV dampers, front and rear electronic lockers, forged carbon-fiber interior accents, and an available hardcore Bison Edition (co-developed with AEV). High Country: The pinnacle of luxury. It replaces bright chrome with modern satin chrome, 22-inch wheels, premium leather, real wood interior trim, a panoramic sunroof, and an exclusive front-passenger touchscreen. As others have stated, why would you want a Silverado - 'Silverado' - wth?? LT needs to remain!!!   Also, there will no longer be a dedicated Z71 model.  All 4x4 trucks will have the Z71 package. Carplay is also something that cannot be removed.  Hopefully it will remain.     I am excited about the 5.7L V8 (350 C.I.D.)  Old school Chevy power.  My only concern is whatever version of AFM/DFM cylinder deactivation.  Too bad that isn't an option a buyer can choose to have or not.   I will definitely be stopping by my local dealership when these trucks start showing up.
    • I haven't seen diesel for less than $5.30 anywhere in my area
    • The not as clean as one would assume theme with the new engine oil, that reminds me of comments over the years with mechanics not always being so on board with filling an oil filter, not from the center anyway due to that typically being the clean side of the filter, danger of some contaminant falling into the filter if not careful but the realization now that the oil may not be as pure as one had assumed it would surely be. Yes it would be possible to fill from the small holes but that means messing with something to prop open the anti drain back valve if the filter is so equipped and not damage that valve in the process. Me, I have hardly ever prefilled an engine oil filter however I have prefilled diesel fuel filters with a filter on a fuel bulk tank and for anyone that has messed with diesel engines with filters and units that have a limited or no way of priming them, putting on a dry filter is a bad day to say the least with those crappy systems. But anyway back to not so clean engine oil, indeed perhaps its not so bad after all that I have not made a practice of prefilling oil filters.    As Grumpy Bear commented on keeping things clean, that I really have to wonder what the typical practice is at a dealer or any other shop that changes engine oil, do they make sure to wipe or wash off the oil plug and certainly if it fell into some gunk or onto a dirty floor, or that they wiped the filter mounting flange and didn't go and use some dirty rag and end up adding dirt to the inside of the head of the filter mount. Or be careless in how they stored or handled the new filter and if they were bumping into items under the vehicle with the filter opening facing up and having dirt drop right into the filter and if so right into the threaded center that is on the clean side. The top side, did they clean away the built up gunk that may be around the filler before removing the cap or to be really careful at that point that something right close to the filler hole that was hidden under the caps flange won't fall into the engine. Or did they clean the funnel or was that just laying there covered in oil from the oil change before and dust kicked up from sweeping the floor stuck to the oil and now that will go running into the next persons engine due to just not cleaning the funnel as "they won't know anyway" attitude as that young guy is more worried about taking a break so he can go outside and smoke a joint. Just random points that came to mind when I think about what some hired personnel may do that the shop foreman has no idea of or perhaps the whole attitude of some shops may be "eh ... who cares, they will never know the difference anyway".  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...