Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Good day everyone, 

 

About 4 months ago purchased a 2008 Silverado 1500 5.3 LY5 vin J . The prior owner had put a 2011 5.3 LC9 in the truck as the original LY5 had blown.  One day I noticed the engine acted as if it was stalling on sudden deceleration. To my surprise the the long term fuel trims were -16.7 % at idle sometimes ranging as high as -21% 
I went through the DTC for PO172 and PO175 . Suffice to say all of the parameters were passed. No exhaust restriction, no vacuum leaks, MAF reading is correct, receiving proper fuel pressure 43 PSI, injector resistance was 14 ohms on all but one injector at 13.9 ohms. O2 sensors are good. 
The only reading that is severely wrong is the MAP which reads 25.1 in Hg. I live nearly at sea level normally Barometric pressure is 29 in Hg here. 
I replaced the MAP sensor and the reading went to 24.8 , the pigtail for the sensor is spliced into the harness. 
I went through PO 106 all of the circuits tested normal 
*[ less than 5 ohms between low ref and ground] - reading was 0L 

*[ignition on 4.8 -5.2 volts between 5 volt ref and ground] - reading was 5.12

*[MAP sensor harness unplugged must read less than 12 kPa] - reading 10kPa

*[install 3A fused jumper wire between signal and 5 volt ref must read above 103 kPa] - Reading was above 103 kPa

signal circuit passed short to ground test

Found the pins on the ECM connector for the MAP pigtail. I tested for continuity between both ends for 5 volt, ground, and signal. All three had continuity. 
This lead the DTC106 instructions to say replace ECM which I did. The problem still happens. 

The check engine light has yet to come on

 

Which leads to my questions
1. Is there a major difference between the 2008 MAP sensor and the 2011 and where to go with diagnosing why the MAP reading is wrong key on engine off.

2. The LC9 engine used flex fuel 37 lb injectors where as the LY5 used 30 lb, upon looking at the injectors in my truck i believe he kept the flex fuel injectors on the LC9 and that is part of my fuel issue. What injectors should i replace them with the stock LY5 injectors Part#217-1621?

Any advice or ideas of how to proceed is much appreciated. 

 

Posted

Yes, the MAP sensor is different between a 2008 and 2011. The switch over was in 2009-2010 to the later style sensor. The linear and offset settings are much different between the two.

 

If the injectors are indeed different size, then yes you need to change them back or tune the computer. A tune can fix both of these issues if you owned HP Tuners or knew someone that did.

Posted

Thank you Cam GTP!

 

Okay so even though the MAP sensor pigtail is spliced into the 08 engine harness the ECM settings for the map need to be reset? 

Posted

Correct. I am going off memory here but in the calibration the 2008 sensor is 94/10.3 for the linear/offset and the 2011 is 121/-0.31 for the settings. Even though the harness pigtail was swapped the calibration is still running the 2008 sensor settings if it was not tuned.

 

If tuning isn't something you can do you can just swap the sensor and pins around in the pigtail as well as swap back to the other injectors.

  • 2 years later...
Posted
On 5/12/2021 at 7:35 PM, Jonathan Motloch said:

Good day everyone, 

 

About 4 months ago purchased a 2008 Silverado 1500 5.3 LY5 vin J . The prior owner had put a 2011 5.3 LC9 in the truck as the original LY5 had blown.  One day I noticed the engine acted as if it was stalling on sudden deceleration. To my surprise the the long term fuel trims were -16.7 % at idle sometimes ranging as high as -21% 
I went through the DTC for PO172 and PO175 . Suffice to say all of the parameters were passed. No exhaust restriction, no vacuum leaks, MAF reading is correct, receiving proper fuel pressure 43 PSI, injector resistance was 14 ohms on all but one injector at 13.9 ohms. O2 sensors are good. 
The only reading that is severely wrong is the MAP which reads 25.1 in Hg. I live nearly at sea level normally Barometric pressure is 29 in Hg here. 
I replaced the MAP sensor and the reading went to 24.8 , the pigtail for the sensor is spliced into the harness. 
I went through PO 106 all of the circuits tested normal 
*[ less than 5 ohms between low ref and ground] - reading was 0L 

*[ignition on 4.8 -5.2 volts between 5 volt ref and ground] - reading was 5.12

*[MAP sensor harness unplugged must read less than 12 kPa] - reading 10kPa

*[install 3A fused jumper wire between signal and 5 volt ref must read above 103 kPa] - Reading was above 103 kPa

signal circuit passed short to ground test

Found the pins on the ECM connector for the MAP pigtail. I tested for continuity between both ends for 5 volt, ground, and signal. All three had continuity. 
This lead the DTC106 instructions to say replace ECM which I did. The problem still happens. 

The check engine light has yet to come on

 

Which leads to my questions
1. Is there a major difference between the 2008 MAP sensor and the 2011 and where to go with diagnosing why the MAP reading is wrong key on engine off.

2. The LC9 engine used flex fuel 37 lb injectors where as the LY5 used 30 lb, upon looking at the injectors in my truck i believe he kept the flex fuel injectors on the LC9 and that is part of my fuel issue. What injectors should i replace them with the stock LY5 injectors Part#217-1621?

Any advice or ideas of how to proceed is much appreciated. 

 

Seems as though the pcm is trying to do its job properly to trim the excess fuel.  I would change the injectors as they are either wrong sizing or have been capped for larger fuel capacity. I had same issues with my lc9 engine.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,840
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    appletrav
    Newest Member
    appletrav
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 501 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • This is a 1/2 ton thing ONLY.  All HDs 2020-2026 have the two speed transfer case, with Autotrac as an option.     1/2 tons 2019-2026, regular 4x4s come with a single speed case (no 4LO!), and trucks with Z71 ordered, or all Trail Boss trucks come with the 2 speed case.  2 speed case is also an option on WT, and is also standard on High Country.  
    • 2013 5.3 still to this day calls for the PF48 filter.  Which as a 15psi bypass pressure.     There is a TSB, 17-NA-157 that talks about the PF-63 and PF-64 filters which have a higher bypass rating of 22psi.    TSB HERE - temp.xml   "Beginning in 2012, the oil pumps began to regulate main gallery feedback instead of pump out pressure. This means that the oil pump now does not begin to regulate until pressure is built up to the main gallery. This change reduces the amount of time it takes to provide oil to the engine bearing and lifters during extreme cold start conditions.  Main gallery feedback oil pump control systems are present on the following engine families which use Spin-on oil filters: Small Gas Engine (SGE), Large Gas Engine (LGE), High Feature (HFV6) Gen2 and Small Block Gen5 gasoline engines. These engines with the main gallery feedback oil pump control systems are factory built with an ACDelco® oil filters"   It also calls out what engines use those filters.  The gen 4 small blocks were not on that list (LMG, LC9, L9H, L92, L94, L20, L96).  Gen 5 small blocks use the higher pressure filter.          That all said...   Your 7045 Napa filter is the PF63 equivalent, with 22psi bypass.  You are already using the higher bypass pressure filter.  You CAN keep using it, you don't technically have to use it though.  
    • Do you know WHY the filter relief setting was increased to 22 psig?    When the new system goes into the second stage the pump volume ramps up considerably. It was found that the 15 psi filter bypass setting put the filter in bypass on a warm engine when the second stage was activated. Raising the filter bypass setting forced the filter to do what it designed to do. Filter. Preventing debris from circulating during high load, high rpm operation.    So next question is how did GM find this out? VLOM/lifter failures and a deep dive by Melling Corp.    Last question. Is it required? Look at it like this; a motor may be equipped with a rev limiter. But it only works if the set point in reached. That 22 psig setting only matters if the pressure differential across the filter media exceeds 15 psig during normal warm operation. Second stage kicks in around 3000-3500 rpm.    I can't answer your question because I don't know you and how you use the truck. But I think there is enough information here to let you decide for yourself. 😉
    • Probably not their first rodeo, so it should go as planned most likely.  Typically the service manager or tech doing the swap will put some seat time to shake it down after they get it all put back together.  We usually put 50-100mi before we hand them back so if something happens, its not after you get it.  A coolant leaks, oil leaks, a ground left off or loose, vibration, etc.     The new engines so far have been good?  There's been a couple that have popped out there again (the replacement engine) but most have been okay.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...