Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

So I have been fighting a no start condition that started 5 miles after replacing the lifters on Bank 2 and also replaced all the injectors while I was in there.  I took it on a test drive and 5 miles in the truck went into limp mode all of sudden for a second or two then just shutoff and hasn't started since.  The code is P00C6 and shows low rail pressure and the rail pressure only shows to be 65-70 while the low pressure side around 80 or so.  I figured something happened to the high pressure pump so I replaced it and still have the same issue.  I then noticed that the fuel temperature also reads -40 and it appears the fuel rail pressure and fuel temperature sensor is one in the same (if it even supports fuel temperature) which made think sensor is bad.  The thought was the computer thinks the pressure is way too low and not even firing the injectors.  I just got a new sensor and ohm it compared to the old one and it is about identical.  

 

I'm getting about 140 ohms between the 5v terminal and the outer signal wire on both sensors.  I am getting open to the center terminal and either terminal on both sensors.   On the truck side I am getting 5v at the plug.  I am getting continuity between the 5v wire and the outer signal wire and getting 50 ohms between the 5v wire and the center signal wire and 50 ohm between the two signal wires. 

 

Has anyone seen anything like this before?

 

2017 GMC Sierra 6.2

Posted

Pulled it back apart today and confirmed that the lifter that drives the high pressure pump isn't doing anything.  Has anyone had one of these fail before?  

Posted

Welp, dug further and the cam isn't moving either so it either broke the chain or sheared the cam bolts.  Thinking at this point I might as well just pull it and do a delete and freshen everything up along with some upgrades. 

  • 4 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,778
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    daveishi
    Newest Member
    daveishi
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,215 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Because that is IDIOTIC, much like this question. They've already been forced to do it by past administrations - why would you roll that back when it's a GOOD thing?  WHO IS ARGUING FOR LOWER MILEAGE???? 😂  NOBODY IS!!   I'm certainly not! What I want is RELIABLE vehicles again that are worth the price paid!    I don't get your logic here ...   In 2003 I paid $2,200 for our '86 Grand Marquis. It's STILL running and I've never been inside the engine, aside for the timing cover since it was leaking, so I threw a new timing set in since that makes sense. Transmission is ORIGINAL. Electric pump in the gas tank is ORIGINAL. Rear end is ORIGINAL. I'd have to hit my head REAL hard to want to pay $60k or more for a car that still can't come close to the comfort, seating and storage space, or reliability of this one. Nothing is even in the ball park! Hundreds of thousands of brands and models have been built and sent to the crusher while this one keeps on going!   https://postimg.cc/Z9XRrCSg   I've got a whole fleet of cars, motorcycles, and a truck close to this age for summer and winter. No one could pay me enough to buy anything built this century. I have zero use for any it.
    • Since I'm the one who has to fix them when they break, I'll take vehicles over 30 years old all day, EVERY day, over ANY modern crap. Have you attempted any repairs on anything built after 2006? It's a friggin nightmare, and gets worse the newer the model year.    If I had the will or desire, I can make any car of any age outside of a Model T (I don't have THAT much will ...) just as powerful, comfortable, and have all the tech the new stuff does, and get pretty close in mileage, too. I prefer SIMPLICITY. The less the vehicle has, the less to fix WHEN it breaks, not IF.   I'm glad you snot-nosed punks don't like them. More for us, plus that keeps the prices from climbing more than they already have.👍
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...