Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

All three of these popped at once which seems odd to me.

P0446: Evap Emission System Vent Control Circuit

C0292: Lost Communication With Engine Control System

C0298: Powertrain Control Malfunction

 

I'm just getting the static Service Engine light, no other lights or screen messages while starting or driving.

 

Is this a wiring issue of some kind?

codes.jpeg

Posted (edited)
13 hours ago, OhOneSilver said:

All three of these popped at once which seems odd to me.

P0446: Evap Emission System Vent Control Circuit

C0292: Lost Communication With Engine Control System

C0298: Powertrain Control Malfunction

 

I'm just getting the static Service Engine light, no other lights or screen messages while starting or driving.

 

Is this a wiring issue of some kind?

codes.jpeg

 

 

 

You've got two issues going on.  Well, three technically.  

 

#1.  You didn't say what YEAR, MAKE and MODEL vehicle you've got.  Important detail.  

 

#2.  You've got a bad EVAP vent valve (most likely).  Very common on these trucks.

 

#3.  Your PCM isn't talking to the EBCM.  Could be a bad EBCM, bad PCM or a wiring issue and would need diagnosing for sure.  

Edited by newdude
Posted
7 hours ago, newdude said:

CM isn't talking to the EBCM.  Could be a bad

1. Oh, right, 2001 Chevy Silverado

 

2. From what I've been told otherwise it could also be the gas tank pressure sensor, but I'm curious why that and the other codes would pop simultaneously. That seems strange to me.

 

3. This is why I'm suspecting it's maybe a wiring issue. If the harness near the rear left wheel has some kind of issue perhaps it would trigger both of these?

Posted (edited)
42 minutes ago, OhOneSilver said:

1. Oh, right, 2001 Chevy Silverado

 

2. From what I've been told otherwise it could also be the gas tank pressure sensor, but I'm curious why that and the other codes would pop simultaneously. That seems strange to me.

 

3. This is why I'm suspecting it's maybe a wiring issue. If the harness near the rear left wheel has some kind of issue perhaps it would trigger both of these?

 

1 - Being you are setting C0292 and C0298, are you 2wd with traction control?

 

2 - P0446 is vent control circuit so the vent solenoid valve has an electrical fault (or wiring to it).  99.9% of the time its just a bad vent valve.  If it was a pressure related code or another EVAP code, sure you could point to a bad pressure sesnor.

 

3 - Depends on what other circuits are there.  2001, the chassis harness that far back will have fuel and EVAP system wiring and circuits to the rear lighting.  If there were major issues in that harness so lots of corroded or broken wires, I'd think you'd have no working fuel pump, no or partial rear lighting, etc. 

 

2001 the ABS is 4 wheel ABS but its not 4 channel so all 4 wheels don't have their own sensors.  Its a 3 channel system so the front wheels each have a sensor, and then the rear is monitored via output speed or rear wheel speed sensor in the transmission (2WD) or transfer case (4WD).  And you don't have wheel speed sensor codes.   

 

 

 

Edited by newdude
Posted
21 hours ago, newdude said:

 

1 - Being you are setting C0292 and C0298, are you 2wd with traction control?

 

2 - P0446 is vent control circuit so the vent solenoid valve has an electrical fault (or wiring to it).  99.9% of the time its just a bad vent valve.  If it was a pressure related code or another EVAP code, sure you could point to a bad pressure sesnor.

 

3 - Depends on what other circuits are there.  2001, the chassis harness that far back will have fuel and EVAP system wiring and circuits to the rear lighting.  If there were major issues in that harness so lots of corroded or broken wires, I'd think you'd have no working fuel pump, no or partial rear lighting, etc. 

 

2001 the ABS is 4 wheel ABS but its not 4 channel so all 4 wheels don't have their own sensors.  Its a 3 channel system so the front wheels each have a sensor, and then the rear is monitored via output speed or rear wheel speed sensor in the transmission (2WD) or transfer case (4WD).  And you don't have wheel speed sensor codes.   

 

 

 

1. Yes that's correct.

 

2. ok thanks

 

3. Interesting. So this implies it's the sensor in the transmission?

Posted (edited)
20 hours ago, OhOneSilver said:

1. Yes that's correct.

 

2. ok thanks

 

3. Interesting. So this implies it's the sensor in the transmission?

 

 

Rear wheel speed sensor would be mounted externally near the tailshaft area of the transmission.  

Edited by newdude
  • 1 month later...
Posted
On 11/11/2023 at 9:13 AM, newdude said:

 

 

Rear wheel speed sensor would be mounted externally near the tailshaft area of the transmission.  

Thanks for all the help.

 

I ended up replacing the vent solenoid valve and all codes went away after a week of driving

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Diesel or gas?  The 37s will obviously, drastically reduce mpg, but the gasser will take a bigger hit to mpg, and power.    I wouldn't sweat a gear change on a duramax at all, and unlikely on the gasser either. You're obviously not concerned with acceleration or towing, and the 10spd will find itself in the right gear without much hunting, if any. 
    • I understand. It is disturbing to think a manufacture asks so much and gives so little in engineering support. This is not a GM issues, this is a greed issue and one the ALL practice.    My intent was not to remove the wind from anyone's sail but rather to point out the areas deficient so that they can be discussed with improvements the goal. But to do that you have to know the truth and what that truth is.    The commercial interest are honed in on a few select issues in which they control all the variables and are not forthcoming in the least with their customers about the details. Failure is the only thing that drives these people to improvement. One way not to fail it to manage public "expectations". The set a bar they can clear and put their thumbs under the suspenders with chest puffed.... Only the internal data tells the story fully. As we don't have access to that for decades then we have to generate it ourselves. UOA's with data that matters.  
    • I had skimmed through that article when you posted the link and honestly I felt rather defeated in a sense and realized that all these years in changing oil that in fact putting in what I was told was a good quality oil was probably not filtered as well as it should be although the filter put on the engine would be what ( as long as it never went into bypass mode ) would be the final filtering of the new oil that the engine components would first see, but then the filtering media itself is not up to par to what is ideal because a full flow filter would be too restrictive to filter fine enough for the engines best outcome in the long run. Only one of our tractors over the years which was a Versatile with a 855 Cummins had a separate bypass filter, some engine manufacturers did spec a partial bypass system within the main oil filter but I don't believe any other trucks or equipment I was servicing used such a filter. No doubt a product like the Amsoil bypass system is of benefit as long as nothing goes sideways with the extra plumbing and filter such as a rupture/leak that could cause the oil to pump out of the engine ( yes that Versatile had a remote canister with hoses routed to it as well ). With the idiot egr system on a diesel and as a result forcing a lot more soot into the oil, that certainly isn't helping the diesel engines cause or as you pointed out the GDI engine issue with creating more soot and aside from having a fancy secondary filtering system, changing the oil more often helping lower the total soot load.     So oil manufacturing and the end product is not something one can control and I wonder if there are specs on what various oil packaging companies produce in particle count or size. As to the filtering, if the OEM is not designing a filter size and spec that is really what it could be, they too are short changing the end user and so what is the answer. Of course as you say the oil side can only do so much if the air side isn't keeping up its end of the picture and air filters are only so efficient and if in a dusty environment such as farm or construction or driving gravel roads there is a lot of dirt to filter out and some of that ends up into the air stream.    Of course the irony in places like where I am where they dump the salt on the highways but also will mix in some calcium or outright pure calcium for problem road area's, or using calcium as dust control on gravel roads, the vehicle that gets used in that environment may rust out before a properly engineered engine and maintenance finally wears out so one has to face that reality in the rust belt. 
    • Has anyone run these on their 2500?
    • have you stuck with dealer oil changes since then? I made the same switch after getting tired of crawling around under the truck, but I’ve found some dealers are way better than others about getting you in quickly. Curious if yours has been good about scheduling or if you’ve had to look elsewhere for quicker turnaround.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...