Jump to content

Gears and/or Converter on a Supercharged Tahoe

Durkin

Recommended Posts

Durkin Enthusiast

Durkin

Posted
Posted

Folks:

 

My signature has the details of the truck; it now has 3.73 gears. It is a daily driver and although a Z71, will rarely see even a dirt road. It may pull a 5,000 lb trailer, occasionally.

 

If you could only do one of these: 4:56 gears front and rear with an Eaton Posi or a Yank Truck Thruster 2,800 - 3,000 stall converter, which would you do and why?

 

If you thought you were going to stop after one if you were really satisfied at that point, which would you do first and why?

 

Regards,

 

Durkin :):cheers::chevy::chevy:

 

2003 Tahoe Z71

 

275/55 Falken ZIEX S/TZ04s on 20" Momo Vantage

Volant Air Box and Filter

JBA Stainless Headers

MSD Wires

Flowmaster 3" Side Exit Cat-Back Exhaust

Magnacharger Radix Supercharger

Wester’s Installed

Comp Cams Magnum Pro Aluminum 1.85 Ratio Roller

Rockers, Pushrods, Springs, Etc

O4 Escalade Platinum Gauge Cluster, Billet Grille, SilverStars

99Silver6.0 Senior Enthusiast

99Silver6.0

Posted
Posted

YANK IT BUDDY!! YANK IT!!! You will have much more fun with the Yank. Go for the TT3000. Most say the 2800 isnt enough. You will retain dam near stock towing capacity with either converter. Yanks are THE best verter to get. Besides the PI Vig converters. But they are pretty pricey. Then again the Yanks are too. But The Vig would be my second choice for a converter. You wont stop after just one thing, it keeps going and going and going! Cam wasnt enough for me... Now I want to do heads!

 

Im opting for a converter out of an 03 Trailblazer. It will stall to 2600RPM behind the 5.3. STR isnt any different than the stock Silverado converter but hey. Its less expensive than the Yank. Stock Silverado converter is 300mm in size. The TB converter is slightly smaller at 280mm. Nice part about the Trailblazer with the 4.2L inline-6 is that it has a high towing capacity. So losing towing capabilites with the converter in a silverado is nonexistant. Best part is it only costs $290 bucks new from GM!

vanillagorilla New Member

vanillagorilla

Posted
Posted

Definatley go with the converter! 4.56 gears seem kinda steep for the street, and your tire size. Especially since its your daily driver. Just make sure you install a good tranny cooler. The TB converter idea sounds interesting, I haven't heard that one. Let us know what you decide. :thumbs:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined

  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,212 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • B14Sierra
      Cam chain tensioner question

      By B14Sierra · Posted

      So I'm in the middle of a DOD AFM delete on my 6.2 L86 Sierra. I had a pick holding the tensioner but after I got the Cam phaser gear off I was cleaning off all the rtv and apparently I didn't have the pick seated far enough in. I bumped it and the tensioner sprang forward.  I think everything is good but I want a second opinion. The top of the tensioner is just a looped piece of plastic that rides in that channel right? There is no spring or anything is there? I got the gear and chain back on and it seems tight and everything looks right. I'm hoping nothing fell out.
    • dna9656
      No low range 4 x 4

      By dna9656 · Posted

      My 2015 1500 LTZ Silverado suddenly won't go into 4 x 4 low. It will go into 4 x 4 high.
    • asilverblazer
      Transmission Woes :-(

      By asilverblazer · Posted

      Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • asilverblazer
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By asilverblazer · Posted

      I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • Chuck FB
      summer road trips in the 2026 2500HD

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...