Jump to content

saddlebag tanks


Recommended Posts

Posted

Does anyone know of a conversion for a 1986 k10 4x4 with saddlebag tanks? I would like to move it inside the frame preferably to the rear. Will the tank from a blazer work?

Posted

Some of the 73-87 3/4 tons and up had rear mounted gas tanks(and the K5 Blazers had them too) you could probably convert one of these over to your truck without too much trouble if you are handy with a welder and such for the bracketry and find a good place to put the filler neck. I would think it would just be a matter of running the hoses longer and mounting it up there especially on a pre-FI truck. I have found all the stuff that goes on the center mounted gas tanks on these year models to be really expensive, I never replaced the sending unit on my 87 K5 because the center tank (31 gallon) stuff was rare and costly ..... Why are you going away from the saddlebags? I thought that 20/20 special on exploding saddle tanks was proven to be staged....Besides what would you do with your spare? :banghead:

Posted
..... Why are you going away from the saddlebags? I thought that 20/20 special on exploding saddle tanks was proven to be staged....Besides what would you do with your spare?  :)

The whole controversy was created by 20/20 by their own admission. I spent 10 years in a body shop in the early part of my career, and I've never noticed a significant number of 'burn' '73-'87 Chev/GMC trucks. Pinto's, yes, poorly installed stereo systems in '82-'92 F-cars, yes, but nothing more significant than that.

 

 

That said, Blazer and Suburban tanks could mount up fairly easily (as most GM things swap nicely), but I've never done it. I'd get a donor Sub or K5 and go from there if you're committed to the project.

  • 5 weeks later...
Posted

I'd measure the frame width before you buy anything. If they are the same then just get everything from a Blazer, everything including hangers, straps, filler tubes, etc. It still won't be a bolt in, but you'll be on your way.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I'm suborn like that Ed. There's a plaque in my doctor office that says, "Don't quit, take a break." Works for allot of things.    Reality is, the wife loves her SUV and even given it's issues, she'd buy another if she found one with low enough miles. Then again she has me to maintain it.    Most of what ails this thing is GM shooting themselves in the foot and by extension the buyer. Besides a ridiculous breather system the cat warm up strategy, IMHO, is the dumbest thing I've ever seen an OEM do to a vehicle they warranty. On cold start it r-e-t-a-r-d-s the ignition to like -17* ATDC and dump fuel like kicking over a pail to force combustion in the CAT's for rapid warm up. This literally hoses the oil off cylinder walls and creates enough varnish precursors to stick rings in even well maintained engines. THEN if that wasn't bad enough they recommend using a wanting fluid specification at equally stupid interval.    Common to all GDI motors I'm aware of is this silly practice of driving the HPFP off the cam giving a leaking pump direct and unchecked access to the crankcase. And sir, eventually the ALL leak. Your job is to "catch it if you can". Yes, these are the same people that removed dipsticks from engines and transmissions in belief Joe Average wasn't capable of checking, reading and maintain his own vehicles fluids. Sadly  and in large they were correct. Most people these days can't tell a sparkplug from a fire plug.  Great ideas one and all.    Every move and every error calculated to defend themselves from the law and their own customers.       
    • Most online suppliers and Amazon. All have noted "not for use with Bose speakers".
    • Very interesting thread. Definitely didn’t expect to see this kind of mileage out of that engine. 
    • Just did an injector/HPFP replacement on Pepper at 192,400 miles; close enough to 200K, RIGHT? (If 200K is considered life end and to me it isn't). But hey, to each his own.    Have never run a catch can on this vehicle. Back side of every valve looked like a new valve spray painted semigloss black. Port walls looked 'neat' (all a normal result of passive EGR via VVT) Zero build up even in AFM cylinders. Just color. It uses no measurable oil and never has.    At 155,000 I put her on E-85 and a borescope of the cylinders at plug change showed very clean pistons and valve faces. The replaced injector tips looked new. (It was the pump piston seal that was leaking). Oh well, have six good backups.    Still gets 28 mpg on gas (highway average) and over 20 (highway) on alky. UOA's look good and runs as good now as it did when I bought it. Better in fact.    What improvement would a Catch Can provide this motor?     And given all this I expect that IF I installed one I'd see some water/gas/oil vapor accumulation. Byproducts of normal combustion.   Having said that, IF my motor used an appreciable amount of oil I'd consider it a useful 'crutch' until I had the situation corrected OR if bore polished, until I junked it or rebuilt it to stave off repeated plug fouling.    I'm not telling you what I THINK. But what its DONE.          
    • Love the look. I'm a SCSB lover myself.    Two items. 1.) A spacer changes scrub radius but this also changes when we use wheels of different offsets. A little isn't a big deal. 2.) Steel wheels, alloy wheels all have different thickness. Same effect on the stud and lug nut as a spacer. When hub centric the wheel isn't supported by the stud. It's supported by the hub. The stud just keeps it all together.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...