Jump to content

New Jeep has arrived


Stepside Z

Recommended Posts

Posted

My new jeep is finally here and I am going to pick it up tomorrow. The big surprise is it has come in with the new premium package. The upside is that the wheel flares are painted. The thing I am not sure about is the crome front. What are your thoughts?

post-35-1094516104_thumb.jpg

post-35-1094516104_thumb.jpg

post-35-1094516104_thumb.jpg

post-35-1094516104_thumb.jpg

Posted

Powertrain

4.0L 6-Cylinder Power Tech Engine

4-Speed Automatic Transmission

 

 

GVWR, Towing, Suspension

Heavy Duty Dana 44/226mm Rear Axle

Dana 30/186mm Front Axle

4,550-Pound GVWR

Command-Trac® 4WD Transfer Case

3.73 Axle Ratio

 

Capacities/Weights

Weight Distribution - Automatic Transmission - % Rear=51.0

Payload Capacity - Standard [lb]=750

Gross Vehicle Weight Rating (GVWR) - Standard [lb]=4600

Fuel Tank Capacity [gal]=19.0

Payload Capacity - Maximum [lb]=750

Towing Capacity - Maximum (Properly Equipped) [lb]=3500

Weight Distribution - Automatic Transmission - % Front=49.0

Base Curb Weight - with Automatic Transmission [lb]=3445

Gross Vehicle Weight Rating (GVWR) - Maximum [lb]=4600

 

I'd say it's more like 14mpg, what with all of that weight on the vehicle.

Posted

No 34 MPG. I am still on the fence about the front grill. I can take it off if I desire. Driving the thing is like driving a go cart, but it does tow the jet ski ( 1100lbs with trailer and gas) like it is nothing, not sure if I should be towing with 110 miles on it. I am very happy with it so far, it seems to dao all that I want it to.

Posted

I'm courious, why this model particularly?

 

I mean, you coulda got a nice used Silverado again for the same price.....if you want gas, coulda gotten a 4.3 with 3.43's......

 

so why a jeep?

Posted
so why a jeep?

 

 

 

We bought one last year, but in our case, needed a roustabout rig that not only had quality 4X4 abilities and strength, but had a small body for fence line maintenance in which the access is through a lot of ravines and limited width trails. Currently use a 4-wheeler for a lot of that, but needed something more substantial.

 

My Silverado is just too big in our case. The jeep is perfect for that.

Posted
I'm courious, why this model particularly?

 

I mean, you coulda got a nice used Silverado again for the same price.....if you want gas, coulda gotten a 4.3 with 3.43's......

 

so why a jeep?

 

 

 

 

I have always liked Jeeps but could never live with the room of the standard Wrangler. The Unlimited provides that needed room.

 

Why not another Silverado? I really have no need for a truck but an SUV type was required. What really sells on the Jeep is 8 bolts, 2 clamps and the top is off. A very nice feature for the VA beach summers.

Posted

I like the looks of it John! :lurk:

 

All of this talk of mileage? I don't get it. You could tow the Jeep and the Jetski on a 3000lb trailer with your PSD Superduty and get better mileage doing it than the Jeep or many 4x4 V8 Silverados do unloaded! :jester:

 

Why not just drive the diesel if mileage is a concern. What are you getting unloaded with the Superduty, John? I'll bet at least 17 to 19 mpg.

 

My V10 Superduty gets a little over 12 average and 14 to 15 highway and it was starting to hurt so we just bought a little base model Pontiac Vibe as an errand runner/work car...my last fillup was 33.7mpg! :flag:

 

Good luck with the Jeep! Looks like a fun vehicle!

Posted

Hill,

Milage is not really an issue with me. The Jeep and Superduty average out about the same. The real issue boils down to a couple factors: 1 I am buying a house after the first of the year. Owning the Jeep opposed to the truck frees up a bunch of money each month. Jeep and ski together cost me less a month then the truck. 2 is security, I have 3 more years left on sea duty. I wanted something that would fit in a garage while I was gone.

John

Posted

Hill,

Milage is not really an issue with me. The Jeep and Superduty average out about the same. The real issue boils down to a couple factors: 1 I am buying a house after the first of the year. Owning the Jeep opposed to the truck frees up a bunch of money each month. Jeep and ski together cost me less a month then the truck. 2 is security, I have 3 more years left on sea duty. I wanted something that would fit in a garage while I was gone.

John

Posted

I see. I thought you you were keeping the truck and buying the Jeep as a second vehicle. Bummer the truck has to go but Jeeps are great too! :fume:

 

Be safe while you're at sea and thanks for helping to protect the country! :D

Posted

Nice Unlimited, I am looking into those but think I will hold out for the 05. They will be available with the 6 spd manual and the Rubicon package.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • LOL west coast they need to see what the midwest actually has.  We have been holding at 2.99 for a few weeks now.  Even by work they have come down to 3.02 for the past week.
    • Diesel or gas?  The 37s will obviously, drastically reduce mpg, but the gasser will take a bigger hit to mpg, and power.  Rough guess, but I'd estimate at least a  2mpg hit on the diesel, and up to 4on the gasser. Maybe more.    I wouldn't sweat a gear change on a duramax at all, and unlikely on the gasser either. You're obviously not concerned with acceleration or towing, and the 10spd will find itself in the right gear without much hunting, if any.    If towing, mpg and acceleration are a concern, you're doing the wrong mods.  Either leave it alone, or do the lift/tires and let the chips fall where they may. 
    • I understand. It is disturbing to think a manufacture asks so much and gives so little in engineering support. This is not a GM issues, this is a greed issue and one the ALL practice.    My intent was not to remove the wind from anyone's sail but rather to point out the areas deficient so that they can be discussed with improvements the goal. But to do that you have to know the truth and what that truth is.    The commercial interest are honed in on a few select issues in which they control all the variables and are not forthcoming in the least with their customers about the details. Failure is the only thing that drives these people to improvement. One way not to fail it to manage public "expectations". The set a bar they can clear and put their thumbs under the suspenders with chest puffed.... Only the internal data tells the story fully. As we don't have access to that for decades then we have to generate it ourselves. UOA's with data that matters.  
    • I had skimmed through that article when you posted the link and honestly I felt rather defeated in a sense and realized that all these years in changing oil that in fact putting in what I was told was a good quality oil was probably not filtered as well as it should be although the filter put on the engine would be what ( as long as it never went into bypass mode ) would be the final filtering of the new oil that the engine components would first see, but then the filtering media itself is not up to par to what is ideal because a full flow filter would be too restrictive to filter fine enough for the engines best outcome in the long run. Only one of our tractors over the years which was a Versatile with a 855 Cummins had a separate bypass filter, some engine manufacturers did spec a partial bypass system within the main oil filter but I don't believe any other trucks or equipment I was servicing used such a filter. No doubt a product like the Amsoil bypass system is of benefit as long as nothing goes sideways with the extra plumbing and filter such as a rupture/leak that could cause the oil to pump out of the engine ( yes that Versatile had a remote canister with hoses routed to it as well ). With the idiot egr system on a diesel and as a result forcing a lot more soot into the oil, that certainly isn't helping the diesel engines cause or as you pointed out the GDI engine issue with creating more soot and aside from having a fancy secondary filtering system, changing the oil more often helping lower the total soot load.     So oil manufacturing and the end product is not something one can control and I wonder if there are specs on what various oil packaging companies produce in particle count or size. As to the filtering, if the OEM is not designing a filter size and spec that is really what it could be, they too are short changing the end user and so what is the answer. Of course as you say the oil side can only do so much if the air side isn't keeping up its end of the picture and air filters are only so efficient and if in a dusty environment such as farm or construction or driving gravel roads there is a lot of dirt to filter out and some of that ends up into the air stream.    Of course the irony in places like where I am where they dump the salt on the highways but also will mix in some calcium or outright pure calcium for problem road area's, or using calcium as dust control on gravel roads, the vehicle that gets used in that environment may rust out before a properly engineered engine and maintenance finally wears out so one has to face that reality in the rust belt. 
    • Has anyone run these on their 2500?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...