Jump to content

envoy review from owners please


Recommended Posts

Posted

the wifey has done nothing but complain since we paid off our 99 voyager. every little rattle or sqeak she is sure to tell me about. (she wants a new car obviously.)

what advice or info on the envoy you guys may have thanks. think about leasing it.

Posted

I'm satisfied with my Envoy. Go for it. If you buy used, get an '03 or newer. Not a fan of leasing here, because of the lock in of the lease if you don't like the car, but to each his (or her) own.

Posted

Mostly the same as a Tb, I went with the TB because IMO it looks better. Your choice, I love the TB. Get the sunroof and add the DVD player later. So you have the best of both worlds.

 

Again IMO

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Just got my '02 Envoy in August... it was what I could afford, I don't like leases either... and just out of Mfg. Warranty, and I always wanted a GMC.

 

It was a local trade, not a program car, and I found it with most all of the options exc. the grill guard and the side rails, and I would like to add the grill guard when I get some extra money.

 

I am a large , (non-PC read "Fat") guy and the only difficulties I have are with the seat belts cutting into my neck... which they also do to my slim & trim wife... and my drivers side view mirrors won't stay in one place even after turning off the curb assist feature. The memory button seems to have no effect to fix that. I think that is a repair I will have to pay for. I assume that GM installed these car mirrors on their trucks to cut down on the drag for gas mileage purposes, but it would have been nice if the mirrors were at least as large as they are on my wife's '03 Rendezvoux.

 

My wife and I fight over my Envoy, largely because I have the sunroof, especially now that she bought me an XM radio to put into it. It is a terrific riding vehicle with plenty of passenger room. I could have done without the heated seats here in SC, but my wife is going to love them. If you don't need a lot of cargo space, such as is in the larger Yukon's/Suburbans, this is your vehicle. Rear cargo space can get a little limiting if you ride around with a toolbox & jumper cables like I do... a bad habit I need to break from driving Ford company cars and trucks for 22 years.

Posted

I have a 2003 Envoy XL SLT V8 and really like it. If you do decide on the extended version, I'd go with the V8 as the milage is rated the same as the 6 Cyl. Lots of room and features and very comfortable to drive.

Posted

Just bought the wife an 04 and took the first trip. Sold a Tahoe to get this one for mileage/expense etc.

 

Is it just me or is the drivers seat very, very hard. Not Firm, but HARD. The seat bottom and lower back.

 

It was uncomfortable for me and is it because I came out of a Tahoe to the Envoy?

 

I figured I would put the question here since it was about a review of the envoy?

Posted
Just bought the wife an 04 and took the first trip. Sold a Tahoe to get this one for mileage/expense etc.

 

Is it just me or is the drivers seat very, very hard. Not Firm, but HARD. The seat bottom and lower back.

 

It was uncomfortable for me and is it because I came out of a Tahoe to the Envoy?

 

I figured I would put the question here since it was about a review of the envoy?

 

 

 

 

Which model SLE or SLT? My '03 Envoy SLT seats may be a little more firm than our '01 Tahoe LT, but not that much difference to me. A main reason for my Envoy purchase was that the seats were more comfortable to me than the same year loaded TB LTZ.

Posted

Have a 2003 Envoy with the 4200 Vortex (I6) engine. Absolutely one of the best vehicles we have ever owned except for the seats. I agree with Toddoughty, the seats are way too firm, to the point they are uncomfortable. Everything else about the vehicle is a "10", but the seats are a fatal flaw that will result in an early trade in.

Posted
Just bought the wife an 04 and took the first trip. Sold a Tahoe to get this one for mileage/expense etc.

 

Is it just me or is the drivers seat very, very hard. Not Firm, but HARD. The seat bottom and lower back.

 

It was uncomfortable for me and is it because I came out of a Tahoe to the Envoy?

 

I figured I would put the question here since it was about a review of the envoy?

 

 

 

 

Which model SLE or SLT? My '03 Envoy SLT seats may be a little more firm than our '01 Tahoe LT, but not that much difference to me. A main reason for my Envoy purchase was that the seats were more comfortable to me than the same year loaded TB LTZ.

 

 

 

 

 

It is the SLT 2wd. It seems like it came out of no where. I dont remember it that way when we test drove and bought the thing. Maybe I am just a FB and need a bigger Tahoe seat. :D

Posted

I had on '03 Trailblazer LT with the custom cloth seats, and they weren't hard by any means. In fact, other than the lack of side support (either on the bottom or the back) I loved the seats. Going around turns a bit quick and you felt like you were gonna fall off though. :lol:

 

My parents recently tried out an '04 LT with leather, and they said the same thing a lot of you are saying- the seats were too hard. I don't know if anything changed between the '03 and '04 seats, or if it's just the difference between cloth and leather seats in the triplets though.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Diesel or gas?  The 37s will obviously, drastically reduce mpg, but the gasser will take a bigger hit to mpg, and power.    I wouldn't sweat a gear change on a duramax at all, and unlikely on the gasser either. You're obviously not concerned with acceleration or towing, and the 10spd will find itself in the right gear without much hunting, if any. 
    • I understand. It is disturbing to think a manufacture asks so much and gives so little in engineering support. This is not a GM issues, this is a greed issue and one the ALL practice.    My intent was not to remove the wind from anyone's sail but rather to point out the areas deficient so that they can be discussed with improvements the goal. But to do that you have to know the truth and what that truth is.    The commercial interest are honed in on a few select issues in which they control all the variables and are not forthcoming in the least with their customers about the details. Failure is the only thing that drives these people to improvement. One way not to fail it to manage public "expectations". The set a bar they can clear and put their thumbs under the suspenders with chest puffed.... Only the internal data tells the story fully. As we don't have access to that for decades then we have to generate it ourselves. UOA's with data that matters.  
    • I had skimmed through that article when you posted the link and honestly I felt rather defeated in a sense and realized that all these years in changing oil that in fact putting in what I was told was a good quality oil was probably not filtered as well as it should be although the filter put on the engine would be what ( as long as it never went into bypass mode ) would be the final filtering of the new oil that the engine components would first see, but then the filtering media itself is not up to par to what is ideal because a full flow filter would be too restrictive to filter fine enough for the engines best outcome in the long run. Only one of our tractors over the years which was a Versatile with a 855 Cummins had a separate bypass filter, some engine manufacturers did spec a partial bypass system within the main oil filter but I don't believe any other trucks or equipment I was servicing used such a filter. No doubt a product like the Amsoil bypass system is of benefit as long as nothing goes sideways with the extra plumbing and filter such as a rupture/leak that could cause the oil to pump out of the engine ( yes that Versatile had a remote canister with hoses routed to it as well ). With the idiot egr system on a diesel and as a result forcing a lot more soot into the oil, that certainly isn't helping the diesel engines cause or as you pointed out the GDI engine issue with creating more soot and aside from having a fancy secondary filtering system, changing the oil more often helping lower the total soot load.     So oil manufacturing and the end product is not something one can control and I wonder if there are specs on what various oil packaging companies produce in particle count or size. As to the filtering, if the OEM is not designing a filter size and spec that is really what it could be, they too are short changing the end user and so what is the answer. Of course as you say the oil side can only do so much if the air side isn't keeping up its end of the picture and air filters are only so efficient and if in a dusty environment such as farm or construction or driving gravel roads there is a lot of dirt to filter out and some of that ends up into the air stream.    Of course the irony in places like where I am where they dump the salt on the highways but also will mix in some calcium or outright pure calcium for problem road area's, or using calcium as dust control on gravel roads, the vehicle that gets used in that environment may rust out before a properly engineered engine and maintenance finally wears out so one has to face that reality in the rust belt. 
    • Has anyone run these on their 2500?
    • have you stuck with dealer oil changes since then? I made the same switch after getting tired of crawling around under the truck, but I’ve found some dealers are way better than others about getting you in quickly. Curious if yours has been good about scheduling or if you’ve had to look elsewhere for quicker turnaround.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...