Jump to content

Fuel Injection Types


Recommended Posts

Posted

Hope some of you more experienced folks can help me out. I had a great experience with a 1996 C-1500 5.7 liter w/ multi-port fuel injection.

 

I am looking to buy a late model Tahoe with the same engine. Today I open the hood of a 1998 for sale and its got what I think is Throttle Body fuel injection.

 

1. Did GM use this type of fuel injection in 1998?

2. What differences am I going to see in reliability? Low and High end power? Cost of repair if something does go wrong? Longevity?

 

Thanks for your wisdom

Gbowling

Posted

I would have thought that it was an engine swap. However, the vortec housing is on the vehicle. Just not in the location that it was on my 1996? Now I am really confused?

Posted
I would have thought that it was an engine swap. However, the vortec housing is on the vehicle. Just not in the location that it was on my 1996? Now I am really confused?

 

 

 

 

Are you sure it was a 98?

 

Aside from a smattering of 2-doors with the 6.5L diesel, all Tahoes 95-99 have the 5.7L V8.

95 had the TBI and 96-99 had the Vortec CPFI (central port fuel infection)

 

The newer body style 2000-up hav either the 4.8L or the 5.3L V8.

 

 

TBI engines have a round breather much like carbed engines did. 96-99 Vortec have a thottle body that points up. The newer LS1 style engine (00-up)has the throttle body mounted on the front of the engine.

 

 

The breather box on a 96 is slightly different from the 97-99, but it is hardly noticeable.

Posted

The owner claims its a 1998. I first thought the engine looked too small for a 350 but, it has stickers on the front that say 5.7 liter. It has been two years since I sold my wonderful '96. I now own a 2003. It is entirely possible that I am just not remembering the layout of the '96. However, I do know the difference in the outer housing of a throttle body. It looks a lot like a carberator. This '98? that I looked at today had that same appearance. I think I will try to look at a few other '96-'99 GM 5.7's and determine if this truck my be older, has had an engine swap, or I am just not remembering things correctly. I appreciate everyone's help!

 

Gbowling

Posted
A 96-99 Tahoe engine compartment should look like this:

 

 

95_4.JPG

 

 

Here is a 95 TBI:

 

563752_26.jpg

 

 

Here is a 2000-up :

 

c3_4.JPG

 

 

 

 

 

Thanks Everyone! Especially 99-2door. This gets me straight. It was the correct MPFi all along. I guess the old memory is getting...well, OLD.

Posted

actually....there are some 99 and up runnin' around with the 5.7L. I believe they are overseas models and possibly Mexico versions. I think we even have a memeber on here with a 00 Sub with the 5.7?

Posted
actually....there are some 99 and up runnin' around with the 5.7L.  I believe they are overseas models and possibly Mexico versions.  I think we even have a memeber on here with a 00 Sub with the 5.7?

 

 

 

 

 

:troll: Well if you want to get technical about it there are several domestic examples of the 5.7L in 2000 models (Z-71 Tahoe, Tahoe limited, Escalade, Denali) , but since he was asking about a 98 it wasn't really worth going into all the detail.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.6k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    343,007
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Brendan C
    Newest Member
    Brendan C
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 1,189 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • You're better read than that Atlas. 😏   British science fiction writer Arthur C. Clarke formulated three adages that are known as Clarke's three laws, of which the third law – that "any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic" – is the best known and most widely cited.   Stribeck and the pivotable Hersey Number isn't voodoo nor snake oil. That part is physics. It's what marketing and bean counters do with it that is snake oil and voodoo.    Stribeck is the relationship between Hersey and the Coefficient of Friction. Within the Hersey Equation if viscosity and viscosity is 'Dependent' on.......heat.......and.......viscosity index or the temperature to viscosity slope.    Specifically Hersey is the viscosity AT THE TEMPERATURE IN THAT LOCATION FOR THAT SLOPE.   Hydrodynamic lubrication exist when the film thickness in the location is 3X the Ra roughness of the surface. This is irrespective of the hardness of the substrate. To obtain that thickness X viscosity is required for Y velocity at Z load. That's a lot of moving parts. It is also impossible to maintain in an ICE but nearly possible with a turbine under constant load.    What does that mean? Error heavy and operate light. Wear is inevitable but the rate of wear and the milage obtainable are a function of prevailing conditions and HABITS. The only penalty is viscous drag and at fractions so low as to be well worth the effort. Double the life, half the manufacturing carbon foot print. Greed is the only impediment.    The materials generated by SwRI are the RESULT not an estimation or a hypothesis.    Don't delude yourself sir, EV's have as many pitfalls as ICE's. We just don't know what they are yet and it will take longer to sort as MARKETING and GREEDY CEO's have had more time to polish the turd they are selling. 
    • You can always count on greed to prey on ignorance and stupidity.    Friend bought a 2019 Ford Flex and asked me about using Valvoline R&P 5W30 in it. Told him give the miles on it and the fact it wasn't yet using oil that it was a good plan. He uses a Valvoline quick change shop for his oil service.   First they tell him that isn't the oil the OEM recommends. He told them he didn't care what the OEM thought. Then they floated the, "But it will void your warranty"    His reply was it's a 2019, there is no warranty and informed them their knowledge of the law was lacking.    Then they tell him 'But it will ruin your motor"!.    Mine to ruin he says. Finally they give in and charge him 150% the semi-syn price    Point it the brainwash is so embedded that even the service industry is drunk on their swill. The public is right behind them. Echoing the same lies on every forum and media platform. If the end goal is indeed EV then I'd say that ship is about built. 
    • Diesel hit $6.00 here today at the truck stop.   Payed $2.79 for E85 today too.
    • Thanks for posting, I'm sure it will help someone
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...