Jump to content

Front end question


Chevforever

Recommended Posts

Posted

My 2001 Silverado 1500 4x4 now has 109,000 miles and the Right side inner tie rod is showing about 3/8" of play. According to my Hayes Manual, it says that the inner tie rods / Relay rod are one unit and need to be replaced as a unit. I ordered the Relay rod (AKA Center Link) from AC Delco parts and when it arrived it did not include the inner tie rods. I was told that the tie rods are available seperately. I have no technical info on how to go about removing the inner tie rods from the original Center link and no torque specs on re-assembly. Should I return the new Center link and order the inner tie rods and attach them to the original Center link?I will also install new outer tie rods just to be on the safe side. Again, I have no specs on the above items that I have mentioned. Any info would be greatly appreciated. Thanks for your time in this matter.

 

Sincerely, John B

Posted

The inner tie rod ends are replaceable separately. I'd say you should return the relay rod (center link) and just get the part you need.

 

Here's the procedure to replace the inner tie rod end from our service information. They say it in a much more orderly fashion than I would. :D

 

Note that the "J 34028 Inner Tie Rod Wrench" mentioned is nothing but a large, open end wrench that fits onto a ratchet, breaker bar or torque wrench for reassembly. If you have something that will fit, it will do just fine.

 

 

 

Tie Rod Replacement - Inner

 

Tools Required

J 34028 Inner Tie Rod Wrench

 

Removal Procedure

Raise the vehicle. Refer to Lifting and Jacking the Vehicle in General Information.

Remove the engine protection shield, if equipped. Refer to Engine Protection Shield Replacement in Frame and Underbody.

Remove the outer tie rod end. Refer to Tie Rod Replacement .

 

Remove the inner tie rod end using the J 34028.

 

Installation Procedure

 

Important: Perform the following procedure before installing the new tie rod ends:

 

Remove all traces of the oil, grease, or other contaminents.

 

Clean the threads of the tie rod with denatured alcohol or the equivalent and allow to dry.

 

Apply red LOCTITE Threadlocker, GM P/N 12345493 (Canadian P/N 10953488) to the threads of the inner tie rod.

 

Install the inner tie rod to the relay rod.

 

Tighten

Using the J 34028 tighten the tie rod to 100 N·m (74 lb ft).

 

Install the outer tie rod end. Refer to Tie Rod Replacement .

Install the engine protection shield, if equipped. Refer to Engine Protection Shield Replacement in Frame and Underbody.

Lower the vehicle.

Verify the wheel alignment. Refer to Wheel Alignment Specifications in Wheel Alignment.

Posted

Thank you very much for the info. I will pick up the inner tie rod ends tommorow and get started on it during the week. The alignment seems perfectly straight along with the centering of the steering wheel, and the tires are wearing evenly except for some cupping due to worn shocks that I will replace while doing the other. Do you have specifications for the toe in on this vehicle? Due to the way it drives I don't imagine it would need a complete alignment (Caster / Camber), just a confirmation on the toe in after repairs are made. Again, thank you for your time concerning this matter.

 

John B

Posted

Don't have the specs handy... they're in our front end machine. :D How do you plan to set this? With a tape measure?

 

If I were you, I'd spend the bucks and get it aligned properly.

Posted

I have a spring loaded toe gauge. Since 1986 I've had five K/V series Chevrolet pickups. Since none of them had any Caster/Camber adjustments, only toe, I invested in the tool. After the first toe adjustment I ever did, I took it to the Chevy dealer where I used to work and they put it on the rack and it was right on the money. So It was worth the investment. I suppose it would make more sense to have the 01 aligned on the rack since there are numerous adjustments that could be done. Thanks for your help.

 

John B

  • 2 years later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Hey everyone, I recently had an issue with my 07 2500HD GMT900. My DRL’s stay on at all times. Right front turn and right mirror turn signal indicator stay on solid at all times. By “at all times” I mean the only way to make them go off is disconnecting the battery. I tore the headlight assemblies out, tried disconnecting the harnesses to eliminate bad wiring at the harness, I unplugged the headlight switch, no change and the mirror turn signal still stayed on. My first thoughts were : Bad bulb and/or socket somewhere, under hood fuse panel bad, bcm bad, tail light or trailer wiring problem, or some random short to power in the harness.  Possibly a bad ground but unlikely. I had a big clue in the fuse panel, it had a burnt smell. I started pulling every fuse that had to do with DRL or right turn/park lamp. Nothing made the right directional turn off but pulling the DRL2 fuse made the DRL’s go out.  After studying wiring diagrams, I found that both problems had that fuse panel in common, the bcm also controls both problems but knowing the fuse panel had a burnt smell I removed and disassembled the fuse panel and found a little corrosion on the printed circuit board.  I ordered a new fuse panel from Amazon for like $260. When it arrived I installed it, and put everything back together, the problem was fixed. I figured the fuse panel needed to be replaced anyway so that was a logical place to start. Hopefully this story helps someone in the future. Regretfully I didn’t scan for codes before I did everything.
    • That stinks. I’m sitting on the side of the road right now with the same issue. Never had an issue before taking it in for the ground strap recall. Now I’m outside of warranty and they’ll probably want $200 just to diagnose what they already “fixed”. 
    • I wonder kind of nuts and bolts they will come up with next? Jim
    • “It should be recognized, however, that there becomes a point where fuel economy oils do not make much economic sense for the end consumer—we talk about a fuel saving of ~€100 compared to a risk of €1000 Euros if the oil is too thin and causes increased engine wear rates. However, the benefit of these oils accrues to the car manufacturers. If their vehicles can save 1–2% fuel by using a special fuel economy lubricant, then that OEM can drastically reduce the amount of fines they need to pay.”   I liked this and the following paragraph as well but it’s really only touching the beginning of the benefits OEMs see from spec’ing these oils. After you factor in “out of warranty” service work and new car sales when these engines fail before their time, it’s a good racket for them. Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get you!
    • Too much voodoo and snake oil.   Time to go EV    😉
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...