Jump to content

IVA-W200


Recommended Posts

Posted

my main question is, will an IVA-W200 fit in my 2006 GMC Sierra, Crutchfield said no, but i am pretty sure i have a Double DIN opening. so i am thouroughly confused

Posted
my main question is, will an IVA-W200 fit in my 2006 GMC Sierra, Crutchfield said no, but i am pretty sure i have a Double DIN opening. so i am thouroughly confused

 

 

 

I have a 05 denali xl and it will fit mine and I want one too, but I would have to get rid of my iva d 300 first :mad:

Posted

how old is your 300 and how much are you willing to sell it for

 

PM me with anything

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
my main question is, will an IVA-W200 fit in my 2006 GMC Sierra, Crutchfield said no, but i am pretty sure i have a Double DIN opening. so i am thouroughly confused

 

 

 

 

 

Yes they fit. It's the best radio ever (I've owned a lot of radios).

 

For the metra kit use the Suzuki\GM multi kit part #99-2003 it has some useful extra parts like an extra trim ring.

 

The install is easy.

 

yhst-12943380358717_1898_21680711.jpeg

Posted
how old is your 300 and how much are you willing to sell it for

 

PM me with anything

 

 

 

changed my mind found out that I would be down grading to the 200, it has less options that the reason for the 400$ diff., and don't get me wrong I love alpine if it had the features that mine had i would sell it.

Posted
changed my mind found out that I would be down grading to the 200, it has less options that the reason for the 400$ diff., and don't get me wrong I love alpine if it had the features that mine had i would sell it.

 

 

 

 

I'm just wondering. What features does the 310 have that the 200 doesn't?

 

I believe the cost difference is because the .5" smaller screen (It's hardly noticeable), the fact that the unit doesn't require as many parts because it doesn't flip out, and the prices have to come down due to the fact so many of the other manufacturers are selling cheaper units.

 

Another reason this unit is less expensive is so they can sell all the add-on units(bluetooth, usb adapter, etc.).

 

If you change to the 200 you won't feel like its a downgrade.

 

Just my .02. :sigh:

Posted

 

changed my mind found out that I would be down grading to the 200, it has less options that the reason for the 400$ diff., and don't get me wrong I love alpine if it had the features that mine had i would sell it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

I'm just wondering. What features does the 310 have that the 200 doesn't?

 

I believe the cost difference is because the .5" smaller screen (It's hardly noticeable), the fact that the unit doesn't require as many parts because it doesn't flip out, and the prices have to come down due to the fact so many of the other manufacturers are selling cheaper units.

 

Another reason this unit is less expensive is so they can sell all the add-on units(bluetooth, usb adapter, etc.).

 

If you change to the 200 you won't feel like its a downgrade.

 

Just my .02. :sigh:

 

 

 

 

I have a friend that owns a high end car audio buiss. in town and he is the one that told me, and he's all about upgrade $$$ the 200 was designed to be competive with other manf. units, I wanted the 200 bad like 4 months ago but he told me he would keep the one I have, it wouldn't be a down grade, just less than I have now,I just can't see going backwards, and I can get this unit cheap, I like the way the 200 looks, trust me I am not shooting this unit down, I like it, and as far as the add on features....well I have to buy them too, Alpine is an alacarte company.

Posted

 

Alpine is an alacarte company.

 

 

 

 

 

You hit that one right on the nose. :tear:

 

But there's none better.

 

 

 

 

 

I'm lovin the way that stereo looks, I've had my finger on the mouse a few times, close enough to press the purchase button, anyways I got a question, maybe you can answer: That Metra part #99-2003, is that compatible with an '05 Sierra? and secondly, the alpine-usa.com website says the screen folds flush (I think they call it "swingface") does it really fold flush when not in use? Thanks for your help.

Posted
I'm lovin the way that stereo looks, I've had my finger on the mouse a few times, close enough to press the purchase button, anyways I got a question, maybe you can answer: That Metra part #99-2003, is that compatible with an '05 Sierra? and secondly, the alpine-usa.com website says the screen folds flush (I think they call it "swingface") does it really fold flush when not in use? Thanks for your help.

 

Yes that kit will work for an 05 Sierra.

 

It sits flush if you don't mount it the way its supposed to be mounted.

You can make it sit flush.

 

If you're in So California (I'm in San Pedro) you can bring it over here and I'll help you install it flush. I teach a Mobile Electronics installation program and I'm open to helping anyone install their own equipment.

 

email me if you want help. [email protected]

Posted

mrinstall, what add ons have you got? I would like to know if you add the Alpine NVE-N872A navigation unit, if you still have to use the remote that comes with it, or if you can control everything through the 200?

Posted
mrinstall, what add ons have you got?  I would like to know if you add the Alpine NVE-N872A navigation unit, if you still have to use the remote that comes with it, or if you can control everything through the 200?

 

 

 

 

We have a Blackbird but the cradle hasn't come out yet.

 

As far as the NVE-N872A you can control the unit from the touchscreen.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Very interesting thread. Definitely didn’t expect to see this kind of mileage out of that engine. 
    • Just did an injector/HPFP replacement on Pepper at 192,400 miles; close enough to 200K, RIGHT? (If 200K is considered life end and to me it isn't). But hey, to each his own.    Have never run a catch can on this vehicle. Back side of every valve looked like a new valve spray painted semigloss black. Port walls looked 'neat' (all a normal result of passive EGR via VVT) Zero build up even in AFM cylinders. Just color. It uses no measurable oil and never has.    At 155,000 I put her on E-85 and a borescope of the cylinders at plug change showed very clean pistons and valve faces. The replaced injector tips looked new. (It was the pump piston seal that was leaking). Oh well, have six good backups.    Still gets 28 mpg on gas (highway average) and over 20 (highway) on alky. UOA's look good and runs as good now as it did when I bought it. Better in fact.    What improvement would a Catch Can provide this motor?     And given all this I expect that IF I installed one I'd see some water/gas/oil vapor accumulation. Byproducts of normal combustion.   Having said that, IF my motor used an appreciable amount of oil I'd consider it a useful 'crutch' until I had the situation corrected OR if bore polished, until I junked it or rebuilt it to stave off repeated plug fouling.    I'm not telling you what I THINK. But what its DONE.          
    • Love the look. I'm a SCSB lover myself.    Two items. 1.) A spacer changes scrub radius but this also changes when we use wheels of different offsets. A little isn't a big deal. 2.) Steel wheels, alloy wheels all have different thickness. Same effect on the stud and lug nut as a spacer. When hub centric the wheel isn't supported by the stud. It's supported by the hub. The stud just keeps it all together.  
    • I had a evap sol go bad a couple weeks ago. . I replaced it.  While watching live data at the time I saw I had some cylinder 1 misfires. No MIL but on live data I could see ~50 at startup and about 70 more after an hour a drive all on cyl 1.  I also noticed that the LTFT were -5% to -15% always.  And that bank 2 is always -3% richer than bank 1. Even across all driving modes, city, highway, etc it’s always 3% richer than bank 1. So I start with the misfire. Swapped coil, plug, and plug wires from 1 to 3. No follow. I got an Injector reseal kit, pulled the D/s injector rail, swapped #1 and #3 injectors, resealed them, reinstalled and retested.  The misfire followed to 3. So I ordered and replaced all 8 injectors, spark plugs, and plug wires. Also replaced the 1 time use fuel pipes under the intake manifold.  Injectors that were in the truck since new were  Part # 12668390.  I replaced them with # 12742701 Got from RockAuto. Pretty certain they’re genuine and the correct ones. I called a friend at a parts store who told me “the 12742701 were the correct superseded part # for the originals I was replacing”. So started truck after replacing all that and it’s running -15 - -30 LTFTs. I reset the fuel trims with GDS2 and drove it for a 60 miles trip each way. There have been no changes in the LTFTs.  I checked if the HPFP was leaking into the crankcase. I removed the pvc and watched the trims. No difference.  I checked the alcohol content and it was at 10%  I’m out of ideas here. Truck seems to run great. Just always rich on the fuel trims.  Anyone with any help or ideas would be greatly appreciated.  I ran an injector balance test just for the heck of it and it came back this. I’m confused.  I have gds2 and some other diag tools if anyone knows of anything I should test next.
    • Definitely needs to go back to the dealer. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...