Jump to content

Changing the "infamous" flex fuel filter


Recommended Posts

Posted

When I reached the 12,000 mile mark on my 2002 Tahoe, I decided it was time to change the fuel filter. The owner’s manual gave me the model number of the fuel filter. It crossed indexed to a Fram G3727. I had several of those on hand, as the 3 other GM vehicles in my household used that same filter. Well, I crawled underneath to find a filter that didn’t match the G3727. It was threaded on the inlet side and had a quick connect fitting on the outlet. A visit to the Fram website showed a different filter for a Flex Fuel vehicle. I wished the owner’s manual had given me that info. Went to the parts house and picked up the filter. The guy at the counter said I would need a “GM fuel line disconnect” tool. I took it and the filter and headed home. Tried everyway I could, but it was a no go on getting the quick connect side to release. I eventually tried every disconnect tool I could find, but the results were the same. Now it’s time to go to the dealer. The parts guy there said I needed a specialty tool made by Kent-Moore, and he didn’t sell it. I gave up and had the dealer change the filter. Now fast forward to 2006. I’m changing the oil in the Tahoe and I’m still upset I can’t change my own fuel filter. The dealer has already changed it several times as I’m now nearing the 60,000 mile mark. I asked myself, am I a man or a mouse? I made my mind up then and there; I will find the elusive tool and do the job myself. An internet search yielded me 2 tools that were advertised to do the job. They were the Assenmacher #8022, and the Lisle #35000. I went to NAPA, AutoZone, and Advance Auto looking for them, but I had no luck. I found both on EBAY, but I wanted to do the job today. I tried Carquest as a last gasp, and low and behold, they had the Lisle tool. I went home, and with some effort, the Lisle tool got the quick connect to release. Inside the quick connect; there was a metal clip with 4 prongs that locked the fuel filter in place. Somehow, I had deformed one of them when taking off the filter. I attempted to bend it back in place, and of course it snapped off. Now frustrated, I head to the dealer to see if the metal clip is removable, and therefore replaceable. The parts guy told me he didn’t think either was possible, as he didn’t show a part number for it. He went on to tell me that I may have to replace the fuel line on the outlet side. It listed for $71, but I could have it for $53. I declined his generous offer and decided to think over my options. Before leaving, I asked if ever his mechanics had encountered the same problem. He said no, they just hack saw the metal nipple off on the outlet side. This allows a standard disconnect tool to be used. I also asked him why did the filter come with a plastic clip already installed, if a metal clip in the disconnect housing held the filter in place. He said he didn’t know why it was included as they just threw them away. This mad sense, since the filter I removed had no plastic clip on it. I decided to go home and see if the 3 prongs remaining on the metal clip would be enough to keep the filter from leaking. It was. I ran my Tahoe for 30 minutes and observed no leaks. Knowing that I may not be so lucky the next time I change the filter, I decided to do more research on the internet. After much effort, I actually found the metal clip for sale without the rest of the hose. It is Dorman part #800-025. Advance Auto didn’t stock it, but they ordered 2 of them for me at $4 each. Pulling out the old clip was a snap. Just bend the prongs inward, and it comes right out. The new one went in just as easy. But then I got to thinking. I wondered if the plastic clip would secure the filter if the metal clip was removed. My curiosity got the best of me. I removed the metal clip, and the filter with the plastic clip installed locked securely in place. I ran my Tahoe for 30 minutes and again observed no leaks. I decided to remove the plastic clip and reinstall the metal clip since this was the way it came from the factory. So to sum this novel up, it looks like you have a couple of options. You can buy the specialty tool, or use a hack saw and a standard fuel line disconnect tool to remove your filter if you want to continue to use the metal clip. Or, you can remove the metal clip and use the plastic clip and not need any tool since you can easily use your fingers to depress the locking tabs on the plastic clip and release it. I hope this info saves anyone else out there the same troubles I had.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I just replaced the filter on my '95 1500 and my brothers '92 explorer (am I allowed to say that here?)mine was threaded at both ends, much easier. The explorer had the quick disconnects on both ends and was a pain in the rear. I didn't know what the plastic clips were for and we ended up throwing them away. I've also go a variety of fuel line tools now, but will check out using the plastic clips next time.

thanks

-matt

  • 2 months later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,903
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    RyGuy43
    Newest Member
    RyGuy43
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 358 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Is it time to put a piece of tape over the CEL? 
    • consider doing electrical testing?  I would guess some power or ground wire/connection has a problem.   alldata.com has wiring diagrams, connector pinouts and diagnostic procedures you can use to find where the problem is.
    • can you tell if the reader is actually trying to get codes, and the pcm is reporting none, or is your reader just silently failing because it's not communicating with the pcm?
    • Any joy with this truck seems to be short-lived.   The CEL for P0172 ("bank 1" too rich) is now "intermittent".   I'm not sure where to check, or re-check, and my energy to keep chasing problems with junk is wearing thin. The P0172 seems to set as I'm coming to a stop, completely off the throttle, when fully warm. At least, that's what it's done the 3? times it's set.   Everything appears normal on the scanner EXCEPT long term fuel trim. There's only one bank on this vehicle because it's an OBD 1.5 with only one upstream O2 sensor. At idle, it's around -16.4% and will dip to -18% occasionally at idle or off-throttle. LTFT approaches 0 when throttle is held at 2500rpm. Short term appears normal, much closer to zero all the time. The LTFT tells me the engine is running rich at idle but compensating at higher load. But, why?   The EVAP purge valve doesn't appear to be leaking/sucking fuel vapor continuously. Is it sticking just as I come to a stop and the engine is choking on fuel vapor and sets the P0172? But that doesn't explain the persistently negative LTFT. Disconnecting the purge valve doesn't seem to make any difference.   I suppose that leaves another dang issue with the fuel injector. A leaking fuel pressure regulator, a new leak in the spider, or a leaking fuel injector/poppet valve I didn't see, or a small crack in one of the spider legs.   The vacuum line leading to the fuel pressure regulator doesn't have raw fuel in it. It doesn't even smell like fuel when it's pulled off, not until you suck air through it, then you can tell it leads to a fuel component. I'd consider that normal? Nothing is signaling this is a FPR issue from the outside, at least.   The oil smells like fuel but it's not building volume. I've noticed most oil in most engines smells like fuel to some degree so it's hard to say if the smell is an issue or not. Or if the engine just still smells like fuel because the crankcase was full of it a few hundred miles ago. But it's been changed twice since that original issue of the leaking fuel line dumping fuel into the intake.   Patience is running very thin. Every win seems to be accompanied by two steps backwards, or another issue that leads to removing at least the top half of the intake manifold. Enough! LOL
    • First off you mentioned "Toyo Says" and then gave the pressures 45/50, was this some person at the tire shop that pulled those numbers out of his head ?   Now of course I can't know your exact axle weights front and rear, however I have much the same pickup as yourself other than not knowing your starting weight as per the pounds the truck rolled out of the factory at due to the options yours did or didn't come with or what you have added beyond the extra tire weight. The correct way to know 100% where a person is at is by weighing each axle with the typical weight the vehicle is driven with and that means taking into account passengers and making sure you figure in a full tank of fuel and a little grace for whatever you may put in the bed "groceries" !    I am looking at and not that it really matters as all the tire companies use the same charts anyway, but I am looking at the comprehensive Toyo tire chart in the section that your tire falls under and I know it sounds confusing but your tire is not an LT metric tire like your factory tire but instead because its a standard inch measured tire its under a different category called an LT floatation series tire. That makes a difference as LT metric tires they don't want to see run below 35 psi at highway speed where as with the LT floatation series it can be run down to 25 psi on the highway as long as the weight on the said size of tire is agreeable with or less than that minimum 25 psi. It blows many people away that how is this physically possible, an empty truck for one thing and larger tires with the same size wheel diameter have a lot more air volume so they can carry the same weight as the smaller tire with less air pressure.    So my truck, I have the stock 275/65R20 wheels and tires and I have a bit of weight in the box with a bak flip cover and a rubber bed mat and some tools and spare gas. The front of my gas truck weighs a bit more than some trucks of the similar spec due to double batteries and alternators. However with full fuel and just me in the truck I am weighted such that I can run 40 front and 35 rear and so that is what I have done since day one.    If I base your truck at or slightly below the weight of my truck, in theory with your tires going by the tire chart you might be right around a minimum of 30 pounds front and 25 pounds rear. Of course that would hit pretty much minimum cold inflation pressure one could run with that tire size and a near empty truck. If you have access to an accurate weigh scale to do individual front and rear axle weights I would suggest you do that and make sure your topped up with fuel and whatever else in the truck before you weigh it and then you will have a great starting point to work off of and figure out what your bare minimum pressures are you can safely run. If you do much in the way of hot weather high speed driving, bumping up a bit for a safety margin is never a bad idea but just depends on what type of driving you do. I will include the Toyo chart and the floatation series sizes start on page 31. Without a doubt at these pressures I am speculating at minimum wise for your truck, it would most certainly ride very different then it did when you were using 55 lb front and rear.     https://www.toyotires.com/media/pxcjubjs/application_of_load_inflation_tables_20200723.pdf
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...