Jump to content

Mass Air Sensors?


Recommended Posts

Posted

anybody put an aftermarket mass airflow sensor in? I took a look at mine the other day for the first time. is the only difference that a performance one doesnt have the mesh screen?

Posted
anybody put an aftermarket mass airflow sensor in? I took a look at mine the other day for the first time. is the only difference that a performance one doesnt have the mesh screen?

 

Not unless its a larger diameter along with a CAI setup to take advantage of a bigger MAF. But I would suspect you'd need some good supporting mods to justify replacing your factory MAF.

 

Also, if you really wanted to, you can remove the screen from your factory MAF. I believe it's primarily here to even out the air flow to your MAF sensor so it gets a better reading. However, I don't think you'd see any significant gains by doing this either.

Posted

I pulled out the screen on mine. The Granatelli sensors are not any bigger diameter, but they claim to be recalibrated? For $350? No problems without the screen on my stock one. I can't really say I noticed a big difference, but the screen is definetley restricting airflow.

Posted

About 2 years ago I had the granatelli and it made my truck go crazy, so I took it out and replaced the stock back in. Also took the screen off with no problems Can't really tell the difference.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Wouldn't you need to reprogram the ecu if you are going to change the size of the maf? I would guess that the sensors are designed to work within a set volume of air...if you change the pipe size you are changing the volume of air that is around the sensors...the sensors would have no way of knowing how much or little air is passing. Changing the maf could cause the engine to run lean or rich.

Posted

The Granatelli sensors are not any larger in diameter than stock. They dont have screens, but supposedly they are programmed different. I think its a scam. The ECM should automatically adjust over time for increased airflow.

Posted

The GMT800 AMFS will support a 8.1 L engine so unless you have a big cam lots of head work its just a waste of money. The 01 to 04 ZO6 used the very same MAFS and made 405 hp.

Posted
The GMT800 AMFS will support a 8.1 L engine so unless you have a big cam lots of head work its just a waste of money. The 01 to 04 ZO6 used the very same MAFS and made 405 hp.

 

Wasn't the ZO6 MAF descreened?

Posted
Not unless its a larger diameter along with a CAI setup to take advantage of a bigger MAF. But I would suspect you'd need some good supporting mods to justify replacing your factory MAF.

 

Also, if you really wanted to, you can remove the screen from your factory MAF. I believe it's primarily here to even out the air flow to your MAF sensor so it gets a better reading. However, I don't think you'd see any significant gains by doing this either.

 

 

so what about after i put in the ram air setup i plan on doing in the future, would it then be worth it? or would getting a tune cancel the need for a new MAF?

Posted
The GMT800 AMFS will support a 8.1 L engine so unless you have a big cam lots of head work its just a waste of money. The 01 to 04 ZO6 used the very same MAFS and made 405 hp.

 

Wasn't the ZO6 MAF descreened?

 

 

The 04 ZO6 was descreened.

Posted

Be careful because I ordered a Predator and Granatelli sensor for Summit for my 03 Suburban, but I got bad codes. Don't remember which ones now, but Granatelli said that their sensor was not compatible with tuners because they both change the timing. I did use the sensor and Hypertech before on my 01 with no problems.

  • 2 weeks later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,840
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    appletrav
    Newest Member
    appletrav
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 501 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • This is a 1/2 ton thing ONLY.  All HDs 2020-2026 have the two speed transfer case, with Autotrac as an option.     1/2 tons 2019-2026, regular 4x4s come with a single speed case (no 4LO!), and trucks with Z71 ordered, or all Trail Boss trucks come with the 2 speed case.  2 speed case is also an option on WT, and is also standard on High Country.  
    • 2013 5.3 still to this day calls for the PF48 filter.  Which as a 15psi bypass pressure.     There is a TSB, 17-NA-157 that talks about the PF-63 and PF-64 filters which have a higher bypass rating of 22psi.    TSB HERE - temp.xml   "Beginning in 2012, the oil pumps began to regulate main gallery feedback instead of pump out pressure. This means that the oil pump now does not begin to regulate until pressure is built up to the main gallery. This change reduces the amount of time it takes to provide oil to the engine bearing and lifters during extreme cold start conditions.  Main gallery feedback oil pump control systems are present on the following engine families which use Spin-on oil filters: Small Gas Engine (SGE), Large Gas Engine (LGE), High Feature (HFV6) Gen2 and Small Block Gen5 gasoline engines. These engines with the main gallery feedback oil pump control systems are factory built with an ACDelco® oil filters"   It also calls out what engines use those filters.  The gen 4 small blocks were not on that list (LMG, LC9, L9H, L92, L94, L20, L96).  Gen 5 small blocks use the higher pressure filter.          That all said...   Your 7045 Napa filter is the PF63 equivalent, with 22psi bypass.  You are already using the higher bypass pressure filter.  You CAN keep using it, you don't technically have to use it though.  
    • Do you know WHY the filter relief setting was increased to 22 psig?    When the new system goes into the second stage the pump volume ramps up considerably. It was found that the 15 psi filter bypass setting put the filter in bypass on a warm engine when the second stage was activated. Raising the filter bypass setting forced the filter to do what it designed to do. Filter. Preventing debris from circulating during high load, high rpm operation.    So next question is how did GM find this out? VLOM/lifter failures and a deep dive by Melling Corp.    Last question. Is it required? Look at it like this; a motor may be equipped with a rev limiter. But it only works if the set point in reached. That 22 psig setting only matters if the pressure differential across the filter media exceeds 15 psig during normal warm operation. Second stage kicks in around 3000-3500 rpm.    I can't answer your question because I don't know you and how you use the truck. But I think there is enough information here to let you decide for yourself. 😉
    • Probably not their first rodeo, so it should go as planned most likely.  Typically the service manager or tech doing the swap will put some seat time to shake it down after they get it all put back together.  We usually put 50-100mi before we hand them back so if something happens, its not after you get it.  A coolant leaks, oil leaks, a ground left off or loose, vibration, etc.     The new engines so far have been good?  There's been a couple that have popped out there again (the replacement engine) but most have been okay.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...