Jump to content

Petition For No Front Plate In Texas


03blackburb

Recommended Posts

Posted
Go here, add your name, and valid email address if you want to JUMP aboard:

 

http://www.petitiononline.com/txplate/petition.html

Too bad that's been around forever. I think it has something like 18K sigs after 7 years. Not too good out of the many millions in this state. DPS won't even entertain the idea. We're stuck with a front plate here.

Posted
Go here, add your name, and valid email address if you want to JUMP aboard:

 

http://www.petitiononline.com/txplate/petition.html

Too bad that's been around forever. I think it has something like 18K sigs after 7 years. Not too good out of the many millions in this state. DPS won't even entertain the idea. We're stuck with a front plate here.

 

 

 

same way here in illinois... there even ELIMINATING our tints now...

Posted
Go here, add your name, and valid email address if you want to JUMP aboard:

 

http://www.petitiononline.com/txplate/petition.html

Too bad that's been around forever. I think it has something like 18K sigs after 7 years. Not too good out of the many millions in this state. DPS won't even entertain the idea. We're stuck with a front plate here.

 

 

 

same way here in illinois... there even ELIMINATING our tints now...

 

No window tint?

Posted

we heard rumor that they maybe eliminating tints all together... even factory... which i couldn't understand... but my uncles a lawyer and i guess he heard rumor or something... should be great... :rollin:

Posted

We share the same pain up here in BC Canada. Its total BS I hate having a front plate, especially on a sports car...Buy a 100K vette and than mar it up with a s**tty old plate. Not my idea of fun.

 

The tint thing, we have that here too, but its only the front 3 windows. If they were to make it illegal to have it on all windows, it would have to be only on new vehicles, some of the factory tints are actual tinted glass, not film. I don't think they could make you go replace all your glass.

Posted
Yeah, same here in iowa :rolleyes:

except the tint.

Here in Texas there are getting to be so many d**n toll roads that you almost have to get on one to go to the frikkin grocery store. Moron liberals keep votong for more... Where did all of our tax money go? SOMEBODY'S sittin on one hell of a slush fund.

 

Anyway, the argument there is that they want a front and rear plate to photograph when you blow a toll booth. (as if you were from Oklahoma or something)

 

Heheh :rollin:

Posted
Only time I have ever been on a toll road is when I was in. . .yep you guessed it, Texas.

They are everywhere down here. Pretty cheap to travel on really. A buck or two goes a long way. In the Austin area where I drive daily a trip down the toll road makes a drive 10 minutes instead of 45 in places. Time is money so its' worth it if you are trying to get across town. A little over a million people are in the city every day (including me) now according to traffic studies. YUK!

 

I live near San Antonio and drive in myself. I usually average about 350 miles a day.

Posted
Yeah, same here in iowa :idiot:

except the tint.

Here in Texas there are getting to be so many d**n toll roads that you almost have to get on one to go to the frikkin grocery store. Moron liberals keep votong for more... Where did all of our tax money go? SOMEBODY'S sittin on one hell of a slush fund.

 

Anyway, the argument there is that they want a front and rear plate to photograph when you blow a toll booth. (as if you were from Oklahoma or something)

 

Heheh :cheers:

 

 

HAHAHA! I still owe you like $2.98 or something for that, don't I? :chevy:

 

FYI for people that don't know what we're talking about...When I bought Fred ('01 Silverado) from Zembonez, I was driving home, and happened on a toll road...Since the truck still had the Texas plates on it...Well...Jim got the bill in the mail a while later. :dunno:

 

For the record, there was no toll booth (I don't blow through those). Just a sign that said "No pass? No problem! We'll bill you!", and no exit before the toll road began.

Posted

I've never seen a booth-less toll road before.

 

 

We have 3 in the richmond area, andone of them has those gates.... It's hilarious cause the EZ pass/Smart Tag lanes have the gates infront of them and during Rush-hour they look like windshiel wipers moving at warp speed like they were in a torrential downpour. :devil:

Posted
HAHAHA! I still owe you like $2.98 or something for that, don't I? :devil:

Mike... The 2 bucks was worth it for the laugh we got out of it.

 

Most all of your toll roads have no booth here. You just drive through at the speed limit and it tallies up your bill. With what is called a TexTag you just have it debited from a special account. Some do have a side 2 lane set up where you can pay with cash but that would take too long.

 

By the way... SOMEBODY GO BUY MY SONOMA in the for sale section... or click the link in my sig! I have another toy coming home soon and I need the garage space.

Posted
Only time I have ever been on a toll road is when I was in. . .yep you guessed it, Texas.

They are everywhere down here. Pretty cheap to travel on really. A buck or two goes a long way. In the Austin area where I drive daily a trip down the toll road makes a drive 10 minutes instead of 45 in places. Time is money so its' worth it if you are trying to get across town. A little over a million people are in the city every day (including me) now according to traffic studies. YUK!

 

I live near San Antonio and drive in myself. I usually average about 350 miles a day.

 

 

Agreed...Its worth the buck to avoid traffic on the non-toll roads up here in DFW as well.

 

The tolls suck, but it kinda works out when you consider that our friends in about 46 other states have some odd thing called 'state income tax'. ;-)

 

--Jay

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,947
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Sothpaw27
    Newest Member
    Sothpaw27
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 442 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...