Jump to content

Installed New Goodies Today...


Recommended Posts

Posted

Hey! Installed my Access Lorado bed cover today. It fits well right out of the box and went on in about 15 minutes. Nice tight fit. Also added some Putco stainless bed rails and the GM accessory tailgate spoiler replacement.

 

I was hesitant to buy a soft cover but I think it looks pretty good. We'll see how well it holds up. The Putco bed rails help hide the fact that the bed cover sits above the bed sides. I think the GM tailgate piece looks much better than the original spoiler did with the cover.

 

What do you think?

 

Part numbers:

 


  • Putco Bed Rails - #59890

  • Access Lorado Bed Cover - #42289

  • GM Tailgate protector - #17802389

 

 

IMG_002258.JPG

IMG_002262.JPG

IMG_002264.JPG

IMG_002253.JPG

 

 

Posted

Looks good :thumbs:

Now you just need a CORSA exhaust system!! :nono:

Posted
Looks awesome man! :thumbs:

 

also d**n that thing is clean!

Thanks man! I am a real nut about keeping it clean.

Posted

does the tailgate close easier with that cover on it instead of the spoiler?? I just put a lund on mine and it is a little rough closing the tailgate.

Posted
When I bought my truck, used, it came with bed rails. What are they for?

 

Eric

 

Tying stuff to it?

 

 

I thought that too until I moved a frig for a neighbor and the rope just slides up and down the length of the rails. They're slippery. You can't tie off tight to one.

 

Eric

Posted
When I bought my truck, used, it came with bed rails. What are they for?

Eric

You can tie stuff to them but they are mostly decoration. Small stuff like a few 2x4s are pretty easy to tie up using them. Not sure about a fridge.

 

does the tailgate close easier with that cover on it instead of the spoiler?? I just put a lund on mine and it is a little rough closing the tailgate.

It does close easier. The new part is thinner at the top of the gate. I think it looks a lot slicker too. I paid $30.00 for mine at the Chevy store.

Posted

Zembo, How much did you pay for your Access cover and your Putco rails? I got the original Access cover and I think it was about $400 and I paid $180 for the rails. I suppose I need to update my pic now since I added the rails a month ago.

Posted
Zembo, How much did you pay for your Access cover and your Putco rails? I got the original Access cover and I think it was about $400 and I paid $180 for the rails. I suppose I need to update my pic now since I added the rails a month ago.

Well. I sort of got a wholseale deal...

 

I really like the cover. Thanks to all of you guys that recommended it. I'll see how well it lasts. My truck lives in a garage and gets driven 2 or 3 times a week so it should last a long time.. I drive a company car most of the time.

Posted
Well. I sort of got a wholseale deal... see my website below.

 

I know, you mentioned that...now spill it dude!!! :crackup: Don't be holdin' back on us now dammit.

Posted
I know, you mentioned that...now spill it dude!!! :crackup: Don't be holdin' back on us now dammit.

Ain't sayin'...

 

:smash: I might never get a good deal again if I outed my suppliers!

Posted

That looks good.

 

My brother has had that cover on his truck for a few years now and it has held of really well. The only tough part is that it is difficult to get clean when the truck gets worked in dusty muddy conditions.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Did the KYBs keep it the same height in the front? I was concerned that pre-assembled assembly would raise it up an inch to standard non-z60 height.. I guess which it would make the rake 1 inch instead of 2 inches.
    • Thank you for keeping the train on the tracks and for a thoughtful engagement. I enjoyed the reflection on a previous stance to refine and improve your position. I like that inquisitive flexibility about you Atlas.    No the process isn't sterile. Hundreds, perhaps thousands of miles of piping, vessels, pumps. Chevron, the people I worked for, were keenly aware that there is a market for what is known as their "ISOCLEAN" line of lubricants. These are lubricants that are the same as those sold bulk that are further processed by filtration to a level your particular application demands. They will filter and package and provide lab documentation as required. Do not kid yourself. Every gallon of oil that goes into a Chevron Turbine, reciprocating compressor, generator is prefiltered and tested before being charged. Lest wise it was when I was there in the plants I worked in.    There are requirements set by manufactures for the cleanliness of the oils used in their equipment. OTR such as CUMMINS has standards shared with customers on this. Commercial interest selling to Ma and Pa do, but don't share that information. Not even upon request but internally, they do exist.    The GM study sited, (Graph from Machinery Lubrication in previous post) only shows "relative" importance.  I find that fascinating. By constructing the graph like this they admit there are dozens of factors in engine life and via scientific method determined the effect of 'relative cleanliness' on engine life not in miles but in 'FACTORS'. This allows a certain amount of reverse engineering does it not?   They even provided some touchstones. Beta 75 as a reference point. Wonderful stuff!!   Smaller blenders CAN and some DO take the time and effort to do better than a refinery or large bulk blender, like Warren Oil, in improving the "in the can" cleanliness. No I don't have a list but testing could generate that information.    Again, but one of several levers we can pull to improve engine life. The simplest is keeping a clean work station while doing your own oil changes.     
    • Thank you. I'll give it a try 
    • I just spent the last 45K miles doing samples every oil change over more than a full year to get the data for seasons and break-in to broke in.    I found the same thing to be true. Something was always teetering on done or had stepped off the cliff long before the OLM was DOA. In fact, I found about a thousand mile difference between summer and winter. That is during the winter half the OLM was STILL too long. Even the severe schedule was to long in the winter.   Now having done the work I can say I was NOT DISAPOINTED. I saw nothing I didn't already know. Nothing my father hadn't already demonstrated in his 2K OCI's pushing dated iron on dated oils and weak filters to mileages well beyond 300K.   Building on his work through use of Lab testing it wasn't hard to find the correlation between 'sight/feel/odor, the things dad relied on, and test results. Use of current viscosity stable chemistries & filters has pushed that marker for my motors out to 3K summer, 4K winter.    So the early lies were 3K on conventional oil and the lie upon the lie was 7K+. turns out to be off by a factor of two.    So... it is true that modern chemistry has doubled the useful oil life. But the base milage that came from was off by double. It's how good lies work. Partly true, sometimes mostly true so that your meter isn't set off. It also means that non-shear-stable shelf oils are only now as good as the old oils were in their best case scenario.    So the question now is how do we improve on that? Thus the question into cleanliness among the other items listed in the post quoted below.    If this bores you, feel free not to participate.       
    • Is it though?  Like LTZ, not a high take rate.  Current Sierra has AT4, Denali and Elevation as its main bread winners.  Each trim accounting for 25-35% of sales for Sierra.  SLT makes up about 10-15% at best.        Like others have predicted here for GMC, it will be:   - Pro (equal to WT Chevy)   - Elevation (replaces SLE and SLT)   - AT4 (and X)   - Denali (and Ultimate).  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...