Jump to content

Afm V/s Non Afm 5.3 - Physical Differences With The Engines?


Recommended Posts

Posted

Where I'm going with this is I am ordering a 5.3L Colorado soon and would like to enable AFM with a custom tune if at all possible since I commute almost 60 miles a day. Are there any physical differences between the AFM 5.3 and the non AFM 5.3, or are they the same aside from the PCM program?

Posted

There is extra hardware. I don't remember what all it is, though. You can't just "turn it on in the PCM,", though. You need the extra hardware, too.

 

Are the Colorados w/ the 5.3 not coming with AFM? That surprises me, if not.. That seems like an easy way for GM to boost their MPG #'s.

Posted
Where I'm going with this is I am ordering a 5.3L Colorado soon and would like to enable AFM with a custom tune if at all possible since I commute almost 60 miles a day. Are there any physical differences between the AFM 5.3 and the non AFM 5.3, or are they the same aside from the PCM program?

 

Yes, they have special lifters and solenoids to activate/deactivate the cylinders/valves. The Valves remain closed during deactivation.

 

Don't even waste your time looking into it. It will NEVER pay for itself.

Posted
Where I'm going with this is I am ordering a 5.3L Colorado soon and would like to enable AFM with a custom tune if at all possible since I commute almost 60 miles a day. Are there any physical differences between the AFM 5.3 and the non AFM 5.3, or are they the same aside from the PCM program?

 

Yes, they have special lifters and solenoids to activate/deactivate the cylinders/valves. The Valves remain closed during deactivation.

Don't even waste your time looking into it. It will NEVER pay for itself.

 

 

While I definitely agree it wouldn't be worth the time & money, it seems like it would be much more effective in the smaller, lighter Colorado/Canyon than in the fullsize trucks.

Posted
While I definitely agree it wouldn't be worth the time & money, it seems like it would be much more effective in the smaller, lighter Colorado/Canyon than in the fullsize trucks.

 

 

Yeah, I agree, but that aint sayin much. :D

Posted

AFM overcomplicates the engine for a very minimal boost in economy. Just wait until that stuff starts breaking! Holy Cow!

Posted
While I definitely agree it wouldn't be worth the time & money, it seems like it would be much more effective in the smaller, lighter Colorado/Canyon than in the fullsize trucks.

Yeah, that's a head-scratcher for me.. There must be some sort of physical space limitations or something. That seems like a real easy way to boost mileage in a more meaningful way... :D

Posted
While I definitely agree it wouldn't be worth the time & money, it seems like it would be much more effective in the smaller, lighter Colorado/Canyon than in the fullsize trucks.

 

 

Yeah, I agree, but that aint sayin much. :D

 

 

Agreed.

 

And look at who's posting in this thread, and how fricken long we managed to stay on topic! :lol:

Posted
AFM overcomplicates the engine for a very minimal boost in economy. Just wait until that stuff starts breaking! Holy Cow!

 

 

Pete, is that you??

Posted
AFM overcomplicates the engine for a very minimal boost in economy. Just wait until that stuff starts breaking! Holy Cow!

 

 

Whatever makes ya feel better about that "sissy" little 4.8 Jim. :D:lol::)

Posted
AFM overcomplicates the engine for a very minimal boost in economy. Just wait until that stuff starts breaking! Holy Cow!

 

 

Whatever makes ya feel better about that "sissy" little 4.8 Jim. :D:lol::)

 

Well... I'm just glad we got that straight Jeffrey. :D

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,835
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    ballencd
    Newest Member
    ballencd
    Joined
  • Who's Online   6 Members, 0 Anonymous, 685 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I’m doing an experiment on a vehicle I don’t have much money in. I’m going by the premise that after they last 100K miles they were no mechanical problems with assembly. Or defects with the parts. With oil changes by the minder for the first 127K miles when I acquired it. I quickly went through low mileage oil changes then settled on 5k oil changes with close to 170K miles on the vehicle currently. I did have the option to turn off the cylinder deactivation. I didn’t on this vehicle because in ECONOMY mode at least half the time. It should be a no brainer frequent oil changes are the key. The manufacturer gets away with the long oil changes with its severe service  maintenance. Just ask them what is normal. 
    • Even set to "recirculated", the air pushes out and is hot. I have noticed that sometime it doesn't want to switch between recirculated/vented air. Say it is set to Circulated Air and I want to switch to Vented, when I click the Vented button, it just quickly lights up/clicks and immediatly switches back to Circulated. It's done this a few times now. So maybe it is an actuator getting stuck? But then, that doesn't explain the hot air when everything is off does it?
    • I wonder what the price is out at the coast, Big Sur or other out of the way locations as I bet they are charging quite a premium over the in land pumps. 
    • Were you looking at the HD trucks on the GM website or the half tons as that makes all the difference. As far as I know there are only two options for the HD trucks and that is the standard 2 speed transfer case or the 2 speed transfer case that has the added 4 high auto feature and they put that transfer case by default into the LTZ and High Country although its optional in the LT and not sure if its available in the work trucks.    The half tons, that is where its been a total mess in my estimation for a few years now with most trucks below the top trim having the single speed transfer case as standard but with the option of having the two speed such as one would get by choosing the Z71 package, however then not being able to get the two speed transfer case with the towing package unless it was a higher trim truck AND had the 6.2 gas so one could combine the towing package gearing diffs with the two speed transfer case. Having said that if its a trail boss package then it gets the two speed transfer case but not necessarily able to get the tow package as it would depend on trim level and engine chosen. Believe me, people have bought the GM half tons assuming "of course it will have a two speed transfer case" only to find out after when they really pay attention to what they now own .... crap, there is NO low range !.    I don't believe Ford or Ram have gone that way yet with their half tons but like I say its been a few years now that GM has done this with the half tons. 
    • $5.19 for regular...
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...