Jump to content

Park Brake Clearance Adjust Impossible?


george.underwood

Recommended Posts

Posted

Need help with 2002 Sub 1500 parking brake adjustment. (125K miles or so)

 

I installed new rear parking brake shoes while doing pads and rotor resurface. Machine shop did not touch parking brake surface on rotor/drum. Parking brakes were not working when removed. (the lever went to floor with little resistance). I had NO problem removing the rear rotor/drums.

 

Haynes manual calls for 0.026 inch (0.66mm) clearance between shoes and drum. I had no way to measure this so I adjusted new shoes out out as much as i could and still get the drum/rotor on. When all back together the park brakes worked just like they did before - NOT AT ALL. But i did not do a cable adjustment procedure.

 

So i ordered the special tool (shoe clearance gauge) recommended to set the brakes and pulled a rotor/drum off today to set them correctly. Also found a more detailed adjustment procedure on internet that agrees with the Haynes spec.

 

Here are the important steps (quoted):

--------------------------------

20. Set a drum to shoe clearance gauge so that it contacts the inside diameter of the rotor.

21. Position the gauge over the shoe and the lining at the widest point.

Important:

a. The parking brake adjustment screw threads should not exceed 5 mm (0.2 in) of exposed thread.

b. The clearance between the park brake shoe and the rotor is 0.6604 mm (0.026 in).

----------------------------------

 

The problem is the inner surface of the drum is 216mm dia and the lip at the edge is 211mm dia. (using the gauge i ordered) There is no way to get 0.66mm clearance with a 5mm smaller hole that the shoe has to fit thru! At min, i can have 5mm/2 = 2.5mm clearance.

 

Am i missing something? Are they talking about clearance to the lip, not the inner braking surface? Is there supposed to be a lip on the rotor/drum at all? Has the lip been worn in by previous (factory) set of parking shoes? I dont think this is likely because I had no problem removing the rear rotor/drums.

 

I have NOT done the cable adjustment procedure yet. I will put them back on tonite and do that and see if they work with about 2.5mm clearance.

Posted

It sounds like the old park brake shoes have worn the inner surface beyond spec. There should be no lip on the edge (just like a traditional drum brake). You may be able to adjust them further out and tighten the cable under the driver's side and have a functional parking brake. You'll just have to do the old adjust until you hear friction and back off a bit. It worked for decades on old cars. :cheers:

Posted
It sounds like the old park brake shoes have worn the inner surface beyond spec. There should be no lip on the edge (just like a traditional drum brake). You may be able to adjust them further out and tighten the cable under the driver's side and have a functional parking brake. You'll just have to do the old adjust until you hear friction and back off a bit. It worked for decades on old cars. :D

 

I guess I'll do that as the rotors are in fine shape- this was thier first resurface. On this vintage (2002), the only adjustment that can be done after the rotor/drum is on is the cable adjuster. There is no ratchet adjuster access from the back side like in the good old days. Unfortunately, my cable adjuster is already at max tight. Looks like it came from the factory that way as i have not adjusted it before.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,842
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    CaptainDad
    Newest Member
    CaptainDad
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 394 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I like the idea.  I would pick diesel if I had a choice. I need pictures though.
    • I've installed cheap eBay new aftermarket digitizers before.  They work.  Did a bunch of Cadillac CUE (aka Cadillac's MyLink) for someone years ago.  They all worked fine after the repair.    That number 22740886, that is a component part # for GM.  You can use it to search, but its not something that's obtainable at the dealer level.     So pretty much any of these will work - 2015 Colorado Digitizer for sale | eBay
    • Black bumper and the later years Z-71 style color matched grille.
    • You can install tailpipes that direct the exhaust sideways vs the OEM one that goes straight back. There are several on the market, do you own research. HOWEVER, you need to make sure the Venturi vents are still intact, otherwise it will throw a engine code. There is a sensor somewhere that detects back pressure on the exhaust. And if it doesn't collect the correct metrics, it will throw the truck into limp mode. 
    • "Teardown" is complete. Head surfaces are clean and ready, new intake is prepped and ready. Coolant drained and water pump is removed, radiator is removed, new hoses and pump are ready.   The replacement intake is also from a '95 (with I think 260k, the odometer said). Noticeably less pitting where it covers the rear coolant passages. I'm not sure if that's a tribute to more frequent use, more frequent coolant changes/upkeep, or if the intake was machined at some point. But it appears I found a good one.   My coolant hoses were original, and the lower hose still retained the factory spring inside. It's not really rusty, but it's got deposits all over it. Unsure if I should re-install it (will thoroughly clean it first). Someone said hose technology has gotten better since 1995 (has it?) and I don't need the spring. I think modern EPDM is what made those hoses last from 1995-2026, so it's a question of how much suction can the water pump really pull, and will it collapse the hose without a spring?   I'm stopped and waiting for parts, however.   When I first brought the truck home, the fan was intermittently hitting the radiator shroud. I could see someone had monkeyed with the shroud (put a bunch of cardboard as a spacer between the upper/lower shroud halves. Someone said the motor mounts have likely failed and the engine has sagged. I wasn't sure I believed that. The engine is really solid in its mounts: To remove the old intake I *just* nearly permanently welded to the heads with freshly cured RTV and gasket snot two weeks ago, I literally had to use the arms on my lift and a chain with a bolt attached to the intake to pull it loose. It almost picked the front of the truck off the ground before ....scuuuuuuuuuuup.... I could actually hear the gaskets tearing and it broke loose and the whole truck settled back down. Motor barely moved.   SO, those parts I'm waiting on... The lower radiator mounts/bushings had completely failed. The radiator needs to be insulated from the rad support, and the bushings help the rad stand at the correct height. The plastic "baffle" was also destroyed at some point. Someone had attached the shroud to it incorrectly, overlapping a joint that should have been underlapped, creating another suspect issue potentially causing things to hit the fan. Broken tabs, side is busted off, and it's perma-formed/bent where it was jimmied incorrectly.   The baffle? Unobtainum. Long since discontinued from GM, of course. Aftermarket/capa/chinese? Also unobtanium. In GM's infinite wisdom, it appears there are at least two different variations whether the Blazer is 2 or 4 door, and I can't yet tell if they shared the same part with the S-pickups. Plan B, if I can't find a viable used one, will be to create a bracket to re-assemble the critical joint I need to seal a gap with the shroud. But that will bug me, it won't be...perfect.   The water pump bolts appear to have been installed with...plumber's putty. I guess, sure, if it works...? I've found a few "backyard fixes" like that. Someone's been here before....   If I can't find someone to jam bamboo under my fingernails to fill my free time this week I think I'll install the driver's power window motor and replace the rear door speaker that's inop. I've got a genuine GM "9.5" ohm working replacement. Why GM used a non-standard resistance....nevermind. Of course they did, you can get more sound from a cheap factory amp that way.   And the saga goes on...
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...