Jump to content

NASCAR mandates use of head and neck restraints


Jpshostr

Recommended Posts

Posted

From Thatsracin

 

---------------

 

NASCAR on Wednesday made mandatory the use of a head-and-neck restraint device by drivers in its top three series - Winston Cup, Grand National and Trucks - effective immediately.

 

NASCAR has encouraged drivers to wear such devices, either the HANS or Hutchens device, this season, but had not required their use.

 

"NASCAR has worked closely with safety experts, drivers and manufacturers to address issues that led some drivers to feel that these devices might make them less safe," said George Payne, NASCAR senior vice president.

 

"NASCAR's decision making drivers'-side windows wider and our educational seminars for drivers have created greater comfort with using these devices. The willingness of the manufacturers to work with drivers in addressing potential drawbacks and explaining benefits also has allayed drivers' concerns.

 

"We will continue our educational efforts."

 

A majority of all NASCAR drivers currently use a head and neck restraint device. In Winston Cup, only one driver, Tony Stewart, currently does not use such a device.

 

"This is a smart decision that will make racing safer for all drivers," said three-time Winston Cup champion Jeff Gordon. "NASCAR's efforts to connect drivers with safety experts and its willingness to work with manufacturers has helped most drivers recognize the benefits of these devices."

 

Pyne also updated the progress of other safety initiatives:

 

 

An occupant-restraint study announced in August is under way. The results of the study will be implemented prior to the 2002 season.

 

Progress continues to be made in the driver compartment, including seating and additional padding throughout cockpit area.

 

Accident-data recorders have been tested in all three major NASCAR series. NASCAR remains on schedule to have the data recorders in full use for the 2002 season.

 

Interviews are in progress for a full-time medical liaison that would attend every Winston Cup event and keep detailed medical histories on all drivers.

 

Candidates for the position of full-time accident investigator are being reviewed.

Pyne also said Wednesday that NASCAR currently has no data that would indicate the so-called "Humpy Bumper," designed by Lew Composites of Las Vegas and initiated by Lowe's Motor Speedway president H.A. "Humpy" Wheeler, would provide additional safety for cars.

 

Pyne said NASCAR would continue to look at additional data as more crash testing is done with the bumper.

 

NASCAR also will continue to work with the Indy Racing League in the development of new "soft-wall" technology and with manufacturers in addressing concerns with the designs of the cars as well as energy absorbing materials.

 

-------------

 

I think this is a good move and they should have mandated it earlier.

Posted

Ought to be interesting, since the only person effected by this rule is Tony Stewart.  I'd imagine he won't be happy, because he doesn't feel safe wearing one.  Just one more thing for him to be pissed off about now.

Posted

So interesting how the restraint affected Stewart at the beginning of the race, keeping him way at the back, last place for a while, but didn't affect him at all on his way to a second place finish.  

 

The guy is an whiny idiot.  I'm tired of his pouting like a three year old.  Glad to see him made to do something he doesn't like to do.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,915
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    ChristopherDobson
    Newest Member
    ChristopherDobson
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,243 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monthly payment is only part of the equation. With today's prices and interest rates, I'd look at the total monthly cost: payment, insurance, registration, fuel, maintenance, and expected repairs. A vehicle that fits comfortably into your budget is usually the better choice than stretching for a higher trim. I've also kept my vehicles longer over the past few years. New cars have gotten expensive enough that driving one for 10+ years, while staying on top of maintenance, often ends up being the most cost-effective approach.
    • 10 Ford and Chevy engines proven to reach 300,000 miles   You may note a common 3K OCI on this list of gas motors. I skipped over the diesels. Dh'O. 
    • Thanks newdude!  By the time manual selection is needed, I'm probably too much of a control-freak to depend on the transmission sensing braking to activate automatic downshifting.  I would be anticipating the situation and already be manually downshifting.   This truck replaced a 2004.5 LLY diesel with the Allison 5-speed.  Putting it in T/H made noticeable differences (when the torque converter locked, upshift points, downshift behavior).  On this 2024 gasser with the 10L1000 I haven't been able to detect much, if any, difference.  Ok, I can never tell now when the torque converter locks up.  But I also don't notice differences in shifting.  For downhills, I've probably already manually downshifted by then anyway.  Since it's also more awkward (than the 2004.5) to engage/disengage I don't even bother.  Or maybe it doesn't really matter with just a 3k lb. camper in the bed?   Thanks also for the list of reasons the charging system might select various voltages.  However, what I am seeing doesn't fall into any of those categories.  It very definitely, and very consistently, rises after coasting/braking.  Maybe not immediately, but not very long after coasting/braking.  Very consistently drops voltage when no longer coasting/braking.  It might also be interacting with the camper battery charging (I might disconnect the camper and see if it changes the charging behavior).  I also need to recheck turning on headlights for when I want to force it to charge the camper.   Another JR, in June I converted the camper to LiFePO4.  Since it's not a good idea to try to charge lithiums directly using truck, I installed a Victron Orion XS DC-DC charger (which BTW is AMAZING!!).  Being cheap, I only had to buy that one item (besides the battery, of course) to do the conversion.  The camper OEM 120v battery charger (only 19 years old and works perfectly) and the truck feed the input to the DC-DC charger (not at the same time).  But I didn't want the camper charger feeding back to the truck so I kept the old separator.  I considered replacing the separator with a 30amp diode but that means more work and might add another 1/2 volt drop.  One thing that surprised me was the voltage drop over the long 10awg wire run, so I can only charge smoothly at 8 amps (because the DC-DC charger is completely configurable).  Another reason I don't want an added voltage drop with the diode.  I might also be a little lazy but all this work is being done under the sink with a small cabinet opening.    
    • apparently CA smog is (or at least was)  checking that the vehicle is using the oem and/or a ca smog approved tune, so I expect you'll fail inspection doing it.
    • yes, leaking exhaust will mess up o2 sensor readings, which in turn messes up fuel trims.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...