Jump to content

97 Tahoe 4x4 Steering Gear Box R&r


leboyd

Recommended Posts

Posted

I just beginning the R&R of the steering gear box on my 97 tahoe (I know either it's bad on the pitman arm).

 

I have some immediate questions.

 

i having difficulty getting the puller on the pitman arm/steering linkage. is there a trick? the 4x4 case is just enpough in the way.

 

does the bolt that holds the steering shaft on the gear box need to be completely removed or just loosened?

 

does the gear box just slide out from the steering shaft or should i expect a lot of tugging and pulling? (not there yet, just mentally preparing) In other words, once I disconnect the pitman arm from the steering system and the bolts holding the steering gear box on the frame, with the box just slide off the shaft (and back on)?

 

If i take measurements on the tie rod ends and install the replacements the same way, can i expect that the steering will be "good enough" to only drive to an alignment shop or can i expect better than that - like almost exact?

 

TIA!

Posted

so to get the puller on the pitman properly you`ll have to unbolt the box from the frame and either push it to clearance the puller or turn it slightly, you only need to loosen the clamping bolt on the input shaft, and it should come off easily but a small prybar can assist. take off your lines then off she goes, make sure NOT to turn yout steering wheel or shaft AT ALL! keep it in the straight forward position (before dissasembly). before installing the new box make sure it is in is "center" position (not turned one way or the other) if it is turned funny you could end up with steering complications.

 

as with the tie rods you should be pretty close just measuring the length, something I do just before i drive it to get aligned is use a tape measure and measure between the insides of the front tires, in front of the axle and behind at the same hieght on the tire and this will roughly tell you if your toed "in or out". then adjust both sides equal amounts untill its about the same or slightly toed in.

Posted
so to get the puller on the pitman properly you`ll have to unbolt the box from the frame and either push it to clearance the puller or turn it slightly, you only need to loosen the clamping bolt on the input shaft, and it should come off easily but a small prybar can assist. take off your lines then off she goes, make sure NOT to turn yout steering wheel or shaft AT ALL! keep it in the straight forward position (before dissasembly). before installing the new box make sure it is in is "center" position (not turned one way or the other) if it is turned funny you could end up with steering complications.

 

as with the tie rods you should be pretty close just measuring the length, something I do just before i drive it to get aligned is use a tape measure and measure between the insides of the front tires, in front of the axle and behind at the same hieght on the tire and this will roughly tell you if your toed "in or out". then adjust both sides equal amounts untill its about the same or slightly toed in.

 

Thanks! Both suggestions worked well.

 

Once I got the pitman arm, it went pretty easily. The most difficult/time consuming issue was losing one of the bolts from the idler arm mount into the frame! Luckily I had a magnet and was able to get it out (dropped it two more times before I could get it back in the hole and the nut started. (Not really a good design)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,863
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Bulldogger
    Newest Member
    Bulldogger
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 799 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Thanks, so being a different beast altogether, anyone know what the "optimal" temp is for the 10L80/90 for proper shifting?
    • How many years have I pointed out every point in that link to the folks here and been avalanched with criticisms and outright hostilities at times? I ran counter to even the great CUSTOMBOSS and Lake Speed Jr and the half dozen experts on YouTube and in the final.....GM, Physics (Stribeck) backs that Grumpy old Bear.    Honestly, I never said a thing engineering hadn't studied silly and laid in concrete during WWII. But I'm old, the information is old and yet, the Laws of Physics are eternal.    Okay there is one exception. I vehemently disagree with their use of the word 'tolerances' when what it meant is "clearance".   The clearance is the distance between two objects. The tolerance is the degree of acceptable variation permitted in that clearance. I.E., piston to bore clearance is 0.004" with a tolerance of +/- .0002" so the clearance is in specification if it lies between 0.0038" and 0.0042". Cutting that 'tolerance in half has ZERO impact on lubrication requirements. Makes for more difficulty in manufacturing.  But a tighter clearance 'MAY'. Depends on finish. Anyway....   It's one of those statements made by people to make themselves look smarter than they are to convince people who are as un-enlighten as they seem to manipulate their behaviors. But hey, the blind leading the blind puts them both in the pit. 
    • Out and about yesterday on a long Saturday drive I passed a lot of Shell stations. My preferred, so I pay attention. Lot's of small town Illinois so not six stations in three blocks like the city.    Everyone of them over a radius of say 100 miles had regular at $4.19 but one which was the one closest to home at $4.15. However Premium pricing varied greatly between 85 cents over regular to $1.50 over. I'm not counting the price of the station with the lowest regular so the reference is the same for the remainder and all within the same brand. However the spread discrepancy holds across all brands.     @txab, any thoughts on that? 
    • What are your thoughts? The Chevy Blazer relaunch was an epic case of 'lunchbag letdown'. Jeep Wranglers and Ford Broncos stick out like a sore thumb.    The AI photos do not look like a 'retro version', but shrunken Tahoes. Get away from the 'futuristic look'. I've seen two concepts. One had rectangular headlight like a Rivian and the other way too big headlights (similar to a previous non-Wrangler SUV) should include dual round headlights like the early version.   If not this would look OK   At least it has GM styling (albeit the K2XX) A lot of the images floating around look like Bronco IIs or the current Bronco. Looking at the Broncos in my area (central Ontario, it seems to be a mix of 2 doors and 4 doors, 'mall rated' to ones that could go offroad.    I'm sure a AT4 and AT4X RPOs could be outfitted similar to a Rubicon if the braintrust understood the whole offroad scene. Crossing my fingers that if it does see the light that the front air dam/bumper doesn't extend below the center line of the tire...      
    • I saw this news earlier this year:   https://theautowire.com/2026/06/12/gm-kills-off-chevys-biggest-silverado-trucks-as-sales-collapse-and-factory-fallout-spreads/
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...