Jump to content

Silverado SS 20's


Recommended Posts

Posted

I just got some SS 20's. I dont think Im gonna drop the front of the truck. Just the rear 2". I want to go with the 275/55/20 Goodyear LS. Price is somewhat an issue. Thus, why I chose the Eagle LS for now. For those who have shoved a 275/55/20 under a stock height 2wd Silverado, how well do they fit?? Anyone think I will have to resort to a 275/45/20? I did a bit of measuring and calculating and from what I can tell the 275/55 will fit. Barely. Stock tire height is 30.6". 275/55/20 is 31.9". 275/45/20 is 29.74". So in reality and from the numbers the tire calculator came up with, the 275/55 is only 1.3" taller than stock. Which would be roughly .65" taller on each side of the tire right?? I think I could fit anything under 32.2" in my wheel well. Please somebody smart help me out!! :chevy:

Posted

actually aint the SS lowered a tad bit like the xtreme s10s.

 

275/45/R20's fit so no reason 55 series wouldn't

Posted

32" tall seems pretty big for a 2wd. They'd probably fit, but imo you'd end up looking like a 4x4. Why not go for a 265/50R20 = 30.4"? It's almost identical to your stock tire height, and since you said that you're on a budget, Goodyear sells their Eagle RSA in that size.

 

Plus you could still lower it 2/4 and not rub :chevy:

Posted

AIM is just a three letter word for CRAP.

 

they rip people off and if they do get what they order it's the worst quality in the world

  • 1 month later...
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

My 02 is 2wd and sitting at stock height. Currently I'm running 265/75/16's without any problems at all. My tires measure out at 31.65" in height and 10.43" in width. As you already noted, the 275/55/20's measure out at 31.9" in height, and then 10.83" in width.

 

Based on the fact I'm not rubbing at all, I think I would give the 275/55/20's a shot and see if they work for you. If you find the right shop, they may even mount the fronts and let you take it for a spin to see if it rubs or what not, and then if there is a problem go with the next size smaller.

 

But I like the idea of the fat tire and slighly higher sidewall. It might keep you from trashing a tire if going over a speedbump too fast. :uhoh:

Posted

on my 03 I went with 285/50/20's in the rear on a 4" rear drop & 275/45/20's in the front with a 2" drop... on a 20x8.5's wheels...

 

sits very street rod like with a little rake towards the front...

 

hope this info helps....

 

ohh yea the 2/4 kit is from Hotchkis... I am very hapy with it...

  • 1 month later...
Posted
How wide is the rim you are planning to use?

The wheels Im running are 8.5" wide. Im thinking about shoving some 2" coils ont he front and see if it rubs. Gives me somethig to do!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,301 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • So I'm in the middle of a DOD AFM delete on my 6.2 L86 Sierra. I had a pick holding the tensioner but after I got the Cam phaser gear off I was cleaning off all the rtv and apparently I didn't have the pick seated far enough in. I bumped it and the tensioner sprang forward.  I think everything is good but I want a second opinion. The top of the tensioner is just a looped piece of plastic that rides in that channel right? There is no spring or anything is there? I got the gear and chain back on and it seems tight and everything looks right. I'm hoping nothing fell out.
    • My 2015 1500 LTZ Silverado suddenly won't go into 4 x 4 low. It will go into 4 x 4 high.
    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...