Jump to content

should be reviewed for increased MPG


yummyfoxybadboy

Recommended Posts

Posted

Lets see here, if someone saves 1mpg with this part, then the average driver will save 56.5 gallons per year (at 15,000 miles per year, using their numbers for the Surburban with the AC on). At $1.90 per gallon, that's $107 annually.

 

Not bad, but how much does this thing cost? The MSNBC article says $70....If it is actually that cheap, then it could be a good investment.

Posted

Sorry but this airboz sounds like snake oil to me. Put it in the same catergory with the Tornado. :crazy: Everytime gas prices jump up, someone comes along with another gimmick. :D

Posted

Am I missing something? What is this thing? If it works so good why won't they show a picture of it or where it installs? Sounds kinda fishy to me, I dont' know but I smell :D

Posted
Sorry but this airboz sounds like snake oil to me. Put it in the same catergory with the Tornado. :crazy: Everytime gas prices jump up, someone comes along with another gimmick. :D

 

 

 

 

 

Am I missing something? What is this thing? If it works so good why won't they show a picture of it or where it installs? Sounds kinda fishy to me, I dont' know but I smell :D

 

 

 

 

We tracked the visitors going to our web site back to this site.

 

Since this is a discussion forum, we will like to participate in the discussion if that is feasible.

 

First of all, the design of this part is somewhat innovative only because we have made it work on a number of vehicles. It is true that will not work on every single make or model. We don't believe we ever made that claim.

 

Second, yes it is a fan with a particular pitch on the fan blade (there is no motor and itis not static like the tornado). Because of the pitch of the blade, the airboz forces more air and removes the negative back pressure from the lower half of the flap on the throttle body. This does not change the air fuel ratio which every car we have tested so far is measured at 14.7.

 

Third, we have been working on this since last year. Gasoline prices went up since June of 2001 and have not come down to that same price. Why are we doing this? Simply because we care to put out there something that works.

 

Forth, we do not want to put a picture out for it simply because we do not want to alert competition. Anyone who tries to copy our product will have to undergo the same regulations that our product is being submitted to. California Air Resource Board is reviewing our application and has held our product since June, 2004. The approval process is out of our hands. However, the process does prove our claim that the airboz will not increase vehicle emissions.

 

In the next few months, car and truck magazines will review our product. Once it is proven that it works, we are still going to hear from those people that think we paid for them to publish positive results.

 

We understand that with any "simple" product comes a ton of skepticism. That is due to the many products in the market which make claims and fail to support them. We have not and will not mislead anyone or any possitive results for financial gain. If this product delivers what it promised, it will remain on the market and obviously if it doesn't, it won't.

We are not in this to fail. Who is?

 

Please feel free to post your questions or just email us directly at [email protected]

Posted
Sorry but this airboz sounds like snake oil to me. Put it in the same catergory with the Tornado. :crazy: Everytime gas prices jump up, someone comes along with another gimmick. :D

 

 

 

 

 

Am I missing something? What is this thing? If it works so good why won't they show a picture of it or where it installs? Sounds kinda fishy to me, I dont' know but I smell :D

 

 

 

 

We tracked the visitors going to our web site back to this site.

 

Since this is a discussion forum, we will like to participate in the discussion if that is feasible.

 

First of all, the design of this part is somewhat innovative only because we have made it work on a number of vehicles. It is true that will not work on every single make or model. We don't believe we ever made that claim.

 

Second, yes it is a fan with a particular pitch on the fan blade (there is no motor and itis not static like the tornado). Because of the pitch of the blade, the airboz forces more air and removes the negative back pressure from the lower half of the flap on the throttle body. This does not change the air fuel ratio which every car we have tested so far is measured at 14.7.

 

Third, we have been working on this since last year. Gasoline prices went up since June of 2001 and have not come down to that same price. Why are we doing this? Simply because we care to put out there something that works.

 

Forth, we do not want to put a picture out for it simply because we do not want to alert competition. Anyone who tries to copy our product will have to undergo the same regulations that our product is being submitted to. California Air Resource Board is reviewing our application and has held our product since June, 2004. The approval process is out of our hands. However, the process does prove our claim that the airboz will not increase vehicle emissions.

 

In the next few months, car and truck magazines will review our product. Once it is proven that it works, we are still going to hear from those people that think we paid for them to publish positive results.

 

We understand that with any "simple" product comes a ton of skepticism. That is due to the many products in the market which make claims and fail to support them. We have not and will not mislead anyone or any possitive results for financial gain. If this product delivers what it promised, it will remain on the market and obviously if it doesn't, it won't.

We are not in this to fail. Who is?

 

Please feel free to post your questions or just email us directly at [email protected]

 

 

 

 

 

I have a couple concerns/questions...

 

1. Since it sits on the bottom part of the throttle plate, doesn't that actually restrict air flow? I'm familiar with porting throttle bodies and such, and I'm just curious as to how "less" air is going to make more power?? I understand how it can still be stoic with the air/fuel, but wouldn't that make less power instead of more, and cause the vehicle to run richer? (Would the PCM think the engine is getting more air than it is?) Will the sensors reading still be accurate? With where they are in relation to the product I mean... Anyways, just random thoughts about it.

 

2. Also, It seems like the chance of it coming off and going into the intake manifold would be pretty high.. Have you guys noticed any problems like that while testing?

Posted
Sorry but this airboz sounds like snake oil to me. Put it in the same catergory with the Tornado. :crazy: Everytime gas prices jump up, someone comes along with another gimmick. :D

 

 

 

 

 

Am I missing something? What is this thing? If it works so good why won't they show a picture of it or where it installs? Sounds kinda fishy to me, I dont' know but I smell :D

 

 

 

 

We tracked the visitors going to our web site back to this site.

 

Since this is a discussion forum, we will like to participate in the discussion if that is feasible.

 

First of all, the design of this part is somewhat innovative only because we have made it work on a number of vehicles. It is true that will not work on every single make or model. We don't believe we ever made that claim.

 

Second, yes it is a fan with a particular pitch on the fan blade (there is no motor and itis not static like the tornado). Because of the pitch of the blade, the airboz forces more air and removes the negative back pressure from the lower half of the flap on the throttle body. This does not change the air fuel ratio which every car we have tested so far is measured at 14.7.

 

Third, we have been working on this since last year. Gasoline prices went up since June of 2001 and have not come down to that same price. Why are we doing this? Simply because we care to put out there something that works.

 

Forth, we do not want to put a picture out for it simply because we do not want to alert competition. Anyone who tries to copy our product will have to undergo the same regulations that our product is being submitted to. California Air Resource Board is reviewing our application and has held our product since June, 2004. The approval process is out of our hands. However, the process does prove our claim that the airboz will not increase vehicle emissions.

 

In the next few months, car and truck magazines will review our product. Once it is proven that it works, we are still going to hear from those people that think we paid for them to publish positive results.

 

We understand that with any "simple" product comes a ton of skepticism. That is due to the many products in the market which make claims and fail to support them. We have not and will not mislead anyone or any possitive results for financial gain. If this product delivers what it promised, it will remain on the market and obviously if it doesn't, it won't.

We are not in this to fail. Who is?

 

Please feel free to post your questions or just email us directly at [email protected]

 

 

 

 

 

I have a couple concerns/questions...

 

1. Since it sits on the bottom part of the throttle plate, doesn't that actually restrict air flow? I'm familiar with porting throttle bodies and such, and I'm just curious as to how "less" air is going to make more power?? I understand how it can still be stoic with the air/fuel, but wouldn't that make less power instead of more, and cause the vehicle to run richer? (Would the PCM think the engine is getting more air than it is?) Will the sensors reading still be accurate? With where they are in relation to the product I mean... Anyways, just random thoughts about it.

 

2. Also, It seems like the chance of it coming off and going into the intake manifold would be pretty high.. Have you guys noticed any problems like that while testing?

 

 

 

 

 

1. No it does not sit on the bottom part of the throttle plate. It increases air flow and it is variable to any given engine rpm. We do not claim that we create more horsepower. We have not measured a difference in horsepower when installing the airboz. This product does not lean out or make it run richer. If it made it run leaner, the engine temperature would rise. Our road trip test to vegas and in Houston would have indicated such rise. The sensors do read the difference of air flow and make accurate adjustments. That is why we use the LM1 air/fuel ratio analyzer to make "real time" readings. We do not test in a garage or test lab. The road testing is what counts since that is where the vehicle is used.

 

2. We have an excellent design to keep anything from being sucked into the intake manifold. We use a stainless steel clip to hold the airboz in place. The installation is simple and anyone who can perform an oil change can install the airboz.

 

There is no such thing as random thinking. If you have any thoughts that may be regarded as concerns, it would be our pleasure to clear them up and bring light to the design, application and installation of the airboz.

Posted

Clearinnovation/yummyfoxybadboy,I need you to explain to me why you felt it necessary to post on this subject under two seperate names.It's beginning to seem like a little trolling or self promotion going on.

 

I would like some clarification on this issue ASAP please.

Posted
1. No it does not sit on the bottom part of the throttle plate. It increases air flow and it is variable to any given engine rpm. We do not claim that we create more horsepower. We have not measured a difference in horsepower when installing the airboz. This product does not lean out or make it run richer. If it made it run leaner, the engine temperature would rise. Our road trip test to vegas and in Houston would have indicated such rise. The sensors do read the difference of air flow and make accurate adjustments. That is why we use the LM1 air/fuel ratio analyzer to make "real time" readings. We do not test in a garage or test lab. The road testing is what counts since that is where the vehicle is used.

 

2. We have an excellent design to keep anything from being sucked into the intake manifold. We use a stainless steel clip to hold the airboz in place. The installation is simple and anyone who can perform an oil change can install the airboz.

 

There is no such thing as random thinking. If you have any thoughts that may be regarded as concerns, it would be our pleasure to clear them up and bring light to the design, application and installation of the airboz.

 

 

 

 

 

Ok, sorry about that. I couldn't really tell from the photo on your site, and I just realized that what you posted earlier about it not being shown anyways... my bad.

I thought the photo on your site showed the thing installed on the lower half of the throttle plate.

 

Anyways, good luck with your research and product!

Posted
We tracked the visitors going to our web site back to this site.

 

You can do that. :D

 

 

 

 

 

Yep but seeing as how he and yummyfoxybadboy are either the same person or they are posting from the same network,they didn't need to.

 

I'm still waiting for a response to my previous post from you "two" on this because you deceived by trying to make it look like you weren't associated with this product to begin with and that's not good practice.It also goes against board rules so I want an explanation.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,760
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    MASONV88888888
    Newest Member
    MASONV88888888
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,563 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • My 2025 Silverado 1500 had to receive a brand-new engine (long block) under warranty last month at only around 16,500 miles. Before the replacement, the truck repeatedly displayed "Engine Oil Level Low" warnings, even though the Oil Life Monitor still showed around 50% remaining after about 6,000 miles since my last oil change. After seeing the warning several times, I checked the dipstick with the engine cold, and the oil level was completely normal. The next day, the message escalated to "Add Engine Oil." At first, I assumed it was just a faulty oil level sensor, so I brought the truck to the dealership. After inspecting the engine, they found internal cylinder wall scoring and ultimately replaced the entire long block under warranty. Before this happened, I was planning to install a 4-inch lift and suspension upgrade on my truck. After needing a new engine at just 16,500 miles, I honestly don't see the point anymore. I also contacted GM to ask whether my vehicle qualified for a buyback, but I was informed that it does not at this time. Anyway, this experience has left me with serious concerns about the long-term reliability of this engine. I sincerely hope NHTSA expands the current investigation or recall to include 2025 model and performs a thorough inspection of affected vehicles. My biggest concern is that these engines may fail shortly after the powertrain warranty expires. If GM truly stands behind this engine, then at the very least, please consider extending the powertrain warranty to 10 years for affected owners. That would go a long way toward restoring customer confidence.
    • Without exception but then I'm the odd duck, right? I know what goes into that test, how it is calculated and thus how to beat it. But EPA values are often not beaten by the general public and the government has in past years adjusted the means and methods to come to those values to more closely approximate "Joe Average".    The only real trick to beating that EPA average is don't drive like "Joe Average".    It's the same method you used to profit from "Economic Migration" and in doing so beat the 'stats'. But you, like me, are not "Joe Average".     The thing you don't seem to grasp is this "Purchasing Power Index" isn't forward looking. It doesn't predict what it going to be but looks backward and states what it was. They are not telling us what the THINK, they are telling us what they MEASURED. Example:    Wife says "I'm going to lose 40 pounds by Christmas". May she does, maybe she doesn't but the doctors office who weighed her when she made that statement and again at Christmas only REPORTS what the RESULT was. You and I can banter about what was possible and what aunt Tilly did till the cows come home but the result is the result. Arguing otherwise is.....irrational. That's all I'm saying. This isn't about:      What you are calling a 'Statistic' is a RESULT not a CALCUATION and as a result the RULE. Like gravity as a rule, it can not be broken. 
    • Just wanted to say thank you for posting this. Years later, your thread is still helping Silverado owners.   I bought my 2025 Silverado 1500 in January 2025, and I've had what feels like the exact same rattle since day one. After reading your findings, I believe my truck has the same issue with the cable carrier contacting the rear sliding window. To be honest, I had pretty much given up on pursuing the issue. It wasn't until I recently drove another brand's pickup that I realized just how quiet their cabin was—and how noisy mine has been all along. On my truck, the rattle happens on almost any paved road, gets even worse on rougher pavement, and I can even hear it during braking and acceleration.   I actually referenced your thread when submitting my case to GM, hoping they'll recognize this as a recurring issue instead of treating it as an isolated incident. The reason I reached out to GM first is because my dealership told me they would need to keep the truck for at least two days just to diagnose the problem. I was concerned that even after two days, they still might not be able to identify the source of the rattle before giving the truck back to me. I had also asked a few dealerships about this issue during previous service visits, but none of them seemed to know what was causing it or had a solution. That's why I decided to contact GM directly first, hoping they might already have an official repair procedure or guidance for this issue.   I also hope GM eventually comes up with an official fix for this problem. I have a feeling there are many Silverado owners experiencing the same rattle, but most either choose to live with it or simply don't know what the cause is.   Really appreciate you taking the time to document your diagnosis. Your post is still making a difference years later.
    • I have 2 choices. 
    • Do you have access to BP fuels? Some stations have Silver 91 E-0 priced the same as their 93 E-10.  There is a local Marathon with 90 alky free for $6 a gallon but I go down the road to BP for $5-ish. They also have a 100 E-0 but that stuff is $10 a pop. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...