Jump to content

New Diesel Postponed So Help With Mpg


Recommended Posts

Posted

I have been waiting for the new LD 4.5L diesel to come out, but of coarse that isn't happening now. Can't even get a RC Hybred, so...

 

Is there a thread (I didn't find in a search here) that address's improving mileage for my (little) 1990 (see mods in sig)? I get 16 mpg combined with very light acceleration & short/skip shifting, which seems typical to good here. Just wondering if there is something I missed.

 

On another note, would increasing rocker ratio and going to roller necessarily hurt mileage if I stay out of it? I miss the pull of my Edlebrock cam kit on my (RV cam) rebuild.

 

I will swap back my Holley using the vacuum port mod/info and retest for mileage.

 

Thanks

post-2543-1250363061_thumb.jpg

post-2543-1250363061_thumb.jpg

post-2543-1250363061_thumb.jpg

post-2543-1250363061_thumb.jpg

Posted

A K&N air filter, new fuel filter, replace plugs, wires cap&rotor (if applicable) would be a good start. You can also try switching to all synthetic fluids in your engine, trans, and gears. To be perfectly honest, though, I've only heard of gains of approximately 1-2 mpg by switching to synthetics, and maybe 1-2 by switching to a k&n. I put a k&n cold air intake, msd blaster ignition coil, 8.5mm wires, msd cap&rotor, double platinum plugs, and a flowmaster exhaust kit, and all together I think I gained about 1 mpg mixed city and highway milage.

 

The fact of the matter is, you can squeeze only so much out of a vehicle before you're just pissing money away.

 

From experience, the best way to save on gas in a pickup is keep it light, keep the tires inflated, keep your foot off the gas, and coast coast... coast!!! lol

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

As far as the rocker arm question goes. By upgrading to roller tipped or full roller (depending on budget) you are reducing friction thus freeing up horsepower. Theoretically you would be gaining mileage. There is a nice article about roller rockers I found on the Car Crap web site. On average full roller rockers free up 8-10HP. Car Crap found they got 11HP and 6FtLb's of torque. Here is the link: http://www.carcraft.com/techarticles/116_0101_roller_rocker_ratio_test/index.html

 

Some guys do the split ratio rockers to get some more performance. It is actually a real popular thing to do. This is where you would put 1.5's on the intake and 1.6's on the exhaust. Here is Summit's explanation: "The lobe lift of the camshaft is increased by the ratio of the rocker arm to produce the final amount of valve lift. A cam with a .320” lobe lift using a 1.5 ratio rocker arm will have a .480” valve lift (.320” x 1.50 = .480”). If you install 1.6 ratio rocker arms, final lift will increase to .512” (.320” x 1.60 = .512”). The engine will respond as if a slightly larger lift cam had been installed. Increasing the rocker arm ratio is an easy way to improve the performance of an existing cam."

 

The prices of SBC valve train parts have been coming down in the last 10 years. I checked with Summit and you can get a set of Proform 1.5 ratio roller tipped rockers for $75 and a set of full roller's for $186. I personally run Harland Sharp's full rollers and they are I think around $220. If it was me I would get a set of full roller 1.5 ratio rockers.

post-63367-1251529311_thumb.jpg

post-63367-1251529311_thumb.jpg

post-63367-1251529311_thumb.jpg

post-63367-1251529311_thumb.jpg

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,840
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    appletrav
    Newest Member
    appletrav
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 711 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Thanks; I looked there a few minutes, and I think I can find something. I really never looked there, as I thought it was stuff like PTO/aftermarket bodies/accessories like snow plows.
    • This is a 1/2 ton thing ONLY.  All HDs 2020-2026 have the two speed transfer case, with Autotrac as an option.     1/2 tons 2019-2026, regular 4x4s come with a single speed case (no 4LO!), and trucks with Z71 ordered, or all Trail Boss trucks come with the 2 speed case.  2 speed case is also an option on WT, and is also standard on High Country.  
    • 2013 5.3 still to this day calls for the PF48 filter.  Which as a 15psi bypass pressure.     There is a TSB, 17-NA-157 that talks about the PF-63 and PF-64 filters which have a higher bypass rating of 22psi.    TSB HERE - temp.xml   "Beginning in 2012, the oil pumps began to regulate main gallery feedback instead of pump out pressure. This means that the oil pump now does not begin to regulate until pressure is built up to the main gallery. This change reduces the amount of time it takes to provide oil to the engine bearing and lifters during extreme cold start conditions.  Main gallery feedback oil pump control systems are present on the following engine families which use Spin-on oil filters: Small Gas Engine (SGE), Large Gas Engine (LGE), High Feature (HFV6) Gen2 and Small Block Gen5 gasoline engines. These engines with the main gallery feedback oil pump control systems are factory built with an ACDelco® oil filters"   It also calls out what engines use those filters.  The gen 4 small blocks were not on that list (LMG, LC9, L9H, L92, L94, L20, L96).  Gen 5 small blocks use the higher pressure filter.          That all said...   Your 7045 Napa filter is the PF63 equivalent, with 22psi bypass.  You are already using the higher bypass pressure filter.  You CAN keep using it, you don't technically have to use it though.  
    • Do you know WHY the filter relief setting was increased to 22 psig?    When the new system goes into the second stage the pump volume ramps up considerably. It was found that the 15 psi filter bypass setting put the filter in bypass on a warm engine when the second stage was activated. Raising the filter bypass setting forced the filter to do what it designed to do. Filter. Preventing debris from circulating during high load, high rpm operation.    So next question is how did GM find this out? VLOM/lifter failures and a deep dive by Melling Corp.    Last question. Is it required? Look at it like this; a motor may be equipped with a rev limiter. But it only works if the set point in reached. That 22 psig setting only matters if the pressure differential across the filter media exceeds 15 psig during normal warm operation. Second stage kicks in around 3000-3500 rpm.    I can't answer your question because I don't know you and how you use the truck. But I think there is enough information here to let you decide for yourself. 😉
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...