Jump to content

Audio Help


Recommended Posts

Posted

Hey guys.  I'm in a quandry of sorts.  I have a lot of decent audio equipment that I pulled out of the F150 I traded in but I can't decide what I want to do with it.

 

For starters, the sound in my truck is pathetic.  After having a quality sound system, I don't know how GM could put such a thing in a vehicle with the "Denali" nameplate.

 

Here is a list of the things that I have:

 

Pioneer Premier P930 (If you can't adjust it with

                             this HU, it can't be adjusted)

Pioneer XM control unit and TERK antenna

MTX500d amp (verified 696wRMS x 1 @ 14.4V)

Eclipse33240 amp 130wRMS x 2

Diamond Audio Speakers

 Pair S600s HEX 6 1/2" Mid & 1" Tweet Components

 Pair M5 12" Subs

 

I really like the way the factory system looks.  And what I would like to do is add the HU from a 2003 with XM controls.  But I don't know all of the pieces that would be involved and I can't find anyone that has any idea if the conversion is possible now.

 

Also, I'm sure the 12's are too big for any underseat application without modification.  I had a 2" lift on the rear seat of my F150 to accomodate the airspace of the woofers.  Although their minimum space is .67ft^3 per speaker.

 

My overall best case scenario would be to sell the Pioneer HU and XM control and the two 12's.  Then acquire the 2003 HU and GM XM control and hopefully use my TERK antenna, add my amps and components to the front doors and then set up some bass under the rear seats. (I bet I'll need to add an active x-over as well since the stock HU is not very customizable)

 

I'd appreciate any info/opinions from you guys!  :thumb:

 

-2002 Sierra Denali

Posted
You can get twelves under the rear seat.  The limiting factor is mounting depth.  I have one on the drivers side.  Just depends on the box you build.  There are some nice installs on sounddomain you could look at to get ideas.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,958
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    B07
    Newest Member
    B07
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 768 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Missing pieces of the Assembly   Detergency vs Solvency   Not the same thing. Detergency is the mechanism that surrounds solid particulates preventing amalgamation. Usually accompanied by a Dispersant whose job it is to keep those encapsulated particles in Suspension. Solvency keeps things that can be dissolved in solution.    Salt is a solid that can be dissolved. Pepper is a solid that cannot be dissolved. A detergent/dispersant is effective on pepper but a solvent is more effective on salt. As long as the solids remain in either state, dissolved or dispersed then they can be be removed with the oil upon change.    How many wranglers does it take to herd cats? Depends on how many cats your herding. How much sponge does it take to soak up water? How much water is there to soak up? Point is most oil blends start with some herding ability and next to zero sponge and recently even fewer wranglers are being sent to do the same job.    So you start with a dozen cowboys and zero cows but at the drive progresses you pick up cows along the way, but not cowboys. At some point you have more cows that the wranglers can handle and some leave the herd. Deposits. And the API has an acceptable number of cows they are willing to let loose. In the ideal world zero is the right number for he rancher but to the butcher....a few lost is fine. This cow is beat to death. Let's move on....   Solvency isn't something oils on the Walmart shelf care about AT ALL. Problem is, you motor does. Fuels driven varnish sticks rings and only a solvent can keep them in check. The bet is that the solids driven portion that plug the expander rings and the oil drain backs and VVT screens and AFM screens will be an issue long before varnish is. Not that it wont be but if they market well enough the consumer can be kept ignorant enough to either believe it is "normal" (A quart in 1 or 2K is normal) OR is kept at bay longer than the first owner is likely to hang on to the unit. Solvency cost money.    Now the OEM's have John Q. Public buffaloed into the belief that the number cows accumulated along the trail is a known and predictable CONSTANT. It isn't. Nor is the rate at which they crossed paths with them. Only the number of wrangles is constant. Or was. Each new generation of oil sees fewer and fewer of them.    So what happens when the number of cowboys is lower (lower TBN) with each seasons trail but the trial is longer (OCI) and the number of cows along that trail continues increase? (Conditions that promote deposits).    For awhile the blenders were on to something. Better bases are harder to degrade (fewer cows) but that was overtaken by a longer trail (OCI) and improved breeding (More cows) while continuing to reduce the cowboy staffing levels (TBN/Aniline #).    Marketing has been successful. We've fired most of the staff, cows breed line bunnies, the trail is ten times longer and we've convinced the boss his ranch is in better shape that it ever was.    That kids is just the cleaning side. The side few pay attention to.     
    • Mann+Hummel since 1941 per their web site 
    • Looking for this part for my truck. They don't sell just that one piece and to get it you have to pay over $100 even used for the whole air tube. The piece the hose clamp snaps into that is held on by the screw and nut. If anyone has access to one please let me know.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...