Jump to content

Biggest Tire For 2wd Without Rubbing


Mulaka

Recommended Posts

Posted

Would it be a 275? I currently have 245/70/17, but want a little more aggressive one. If the 285 will even fit, what would be better overall (least loss of power, gas mileage etc,): 265/70/17, 275/70/17 or 285/7/17?

Posted

I had the 245/70/17's, and upgraded to the 265/70/17's. There is a little room, but I didn't want to push my luck!

 

As for mileage the bigger the tire is the more rotating mas you have; thus the truck has to work harder to get you going, and to stop you as well. I would go with the 265's.... jm2c

Posted
I had the 245/70/17's, and upgraded to the 265/70/17's. There is a little room, but I didn't want to push my luck!

 

As for mileage the bigger the tire is the more rotating mas you have; thus the truck has to work harder to get you going, and to stop you as well. I would go with the 265's.... jm2c

 

Thanks!

Posted

kawtoy_77,

 

I looked at the pictures you have up of your 2007...are the Destination tires I see the 265/70/17's you were talking about? If so, then are they Firestone Destination?

Posted

I think 285s will rub without the 1.5 or 2" lift on the front. IMO the 285s look the best, and the rc 2" kit is a cheap and easy. But if you have the 3.42 gears the truck may feel a bit doggy off the line with the big tires.

Posted
kawtoy_77,

 

I looked at the pictures you have up of your 2007...are the Destination tires I see the 265/70/17's you were talking about? If so, then are they Firestone Destination?

I do not have Destination tires on my Sierra, I have DynaPro's. They are Hankook's I have 20,000 miles on them now, and still love them. The Destinations looked like too much of a factory raod tire and I drive alot of county roads, so I went with something a little more aggressive. They do excellent on ice.

Posted

the 265's will clear with stock height. Not sure about the 275's. the 285's will have some rubbing unless you at least get a 2 inch leveling kit and/or minor trimming.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.6k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,993
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    President Roberto
    Newest Member
    President Roberto
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 252 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I don't wanna do major surgery/upgrades, behind-the-dash work, add amps, change radio etc. on my '26 std cab WT. On the WT, it has the base 7" IOR infotainment setup, and only two speakers (doors). Since I listen to classical, looked around for speakers that do well and dug thru reviews. Two-way speakers were found to be better than 3-way. So I've ordered a pair of  Infinity Reference REF-9632IX 2 way speakers.  [These may  or may not have been discontinued / succeeded by the 3-way ...9633 ones.]    These speakers are lauded for 3 ohm and 94db sensitivity spec so they'll work well for ordinary base car radios without amps and offer better performance (quality,  strength) than  default base paper-cone speakers. They'll be installed in a few days and I'll let y'all know what I think. Bill W San Jose      
    • Thanks!   Changed out the rear shocks today to Bilstein 5100s.  So far feel much better. The stock Rancho were wore out.  Lots of heavy hauling (2 moves, home renovations, etc).  Next up is new BFG tires Monday.  Cant wait the current tires have little to no wet traction and are super loud (hum)    
    • Ok, I got the all the codes. What do you all think would be a place to start?
    • How about I just point to the factory pans stand pipe little drain plug and claim its a pan with a real drain plug !. I just couldn't swallow the fact that a Dorman pan which at this point is probably the only pan out there that fits the gas version truck cost that much up here in Canada so I decided initially anyway to skip it and see what I thought of pulling the pan method and down the road if I felt inclined enough then I would either install a drain plug kit in the factory pan if there is enough room for it, or have a bung welded onto it, or put an aftermarket pan on. The thing is if the pan is not pulled then the magnets in the pan can't be inspected and cleaned or if wanting to change out the filter. However of course it certainly would make the job easier to be able to drop the oil first before having to handle the pan if dropping the pan that go around was the goal.    I knew a guy locally that was doing custom field spraying years ago with a pickup pulling a ground driven sprayer, I believe it was a GM pickup with an automatic trans. He had a drain plug in his pan and would drop the oil out of it once a week and top it back up through the dipstick tube to keep refreshing a portion of the oil often and that made the transmission last far longer than had he done nothing. Soft fields pulling 500 gallons of water at the start of each mixed up sprayer tank batch and in low range sucking along. I imagine he got some tips from other custom sprayer outfits doing the same thing at the time and learning from their blown up tranny mistakes. Transmissions then had no lock up converter so would cook the crap out of the fluid slipping that much and it would not have been synthetic fluid either. 
    • 3.39 Kroger’s in Montgomery Texas. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...