Jump to content

Is This Thinner Steel?


unit731

Recommended Posts

Posted

David Sedgwick

Automotive News -- January 10, 2011 - 12:01 am ET

 

 

As North American automakers put their vehicles on a weight-loss plan, they are turning increasingly to a new generation of advanced high-strength steel.

 

The average vehicle built in North America contains 151 pounds of advanced high-strength steel, up from 111 pounds in 2007, according to Ducker Worldwide, a suburban Detroit consulting firm.

 

Dick Schultz, Ducker's managing director, predicts automakers will increase use of advanced steel 10 to 15 percent annually over the next five years or so. The stronger varieties of steel let automakers use lighter structural parts.

 

What's the practical limit? Schultz expects use will reach about 450 pounds per vehicle. That would be more than half the weight of a typical vehicle's body, bumper and doors.

 

Honda Motor Co. and BMW AG are considered industry leaders in the use of advanced steel. But Schultz says all the automakers are making more use of it. "It's fair to say there were early adopters," Schultz said. "But everybody is catching up."

'New steel'

 

Schultz calls the new varieties of steel "new steel" to differentiate them from the first generation of high-strength steel that has been around for years.

 

In the 1990s, the steel industry began to promote new steel as a way to cut vehicle weight and improve a vehicle's crashworthiness.

 

Steel makers produce it by adding small amounts of alloys -- such as manganese or molybdenum -- then heating the metal above 1,300 degrees Fahrenheit. The result is hardened steel that has enough "give" to be shaped by a stamping press.

 

One of the first automakers to use advanced steel was BMW, which now uses it in all its models. The 7 series uses roughly 400 pounds of it per vehicle.

 

Honda Motor Co., North America's second-largest user of advanced steel, made extensive use of it in the redesigned Honda Odyssey minivan. Fifty-nine percent of the Odyssey's steel is advanced steel, up from 35 percent in the previous version.

 

Honda's engineers used advanced steel in the A- and B-pillars, bumpers, roof, doors and some body panels. Perhaps Honda's most creative use of new steel is in the front-end body structure, to improve crash protection.

 

In the Odyssey's front end, a polygon-shaped frame disperses the impact of a front-end collision through the floor frame rails, side sills and A-pillars.

 

By contrast, a conventional vehicle would channel all of the impact through the lower load-bearing rails.

 

Except for the Element and Ridgeline, all of Honda's North American models have been given this polygon frame, which the company calls "Advanced Compatibility Engineering."

 

Pickups next

 

Schultz predicts industry use of new steel will rise substantially as automakers redesign their full-sized pickups. For example, General Motors Co. is redesigning its 2014 Silverado and Sierra pickups.

 

That represents a major opportunity for makers of new steel because GM's light-duty pickups were last redesigned in 1999.

 

GM is switching to new steel. The American Iron and Steel Institute estimates GM will use more than 120,000 tons of advanced steel this year, up from 40,000 tons in 2006.

 

Who will benefit? In North America, the automotive steel market is dominated by United States Steel Corp.; ArcelorMittal; Nucor Corp.; Severstal North America, a unit of Russia's OAO Severstal; and AK Steel Corp.

 

While auto production remains below pre-recession highs, steel makers are spending huge sums to renovate old facilities and build new ones.

 

German steel maker Thyssen-Krupp AG, for example, has spent $3.7 billion to build a processing mill in Mobile County, Alabama. The plant, which was completed this year, will convert slabs shipped from Brazil into sheet metal for exterior body panels and other parts.

 

Spending on steel

 

OAO Severstal, which bought the assets of bankrupt Rouge Steel Co. in 2004, also is spending big to upgrade its facilities.

 

The Russian steel maker has spent $1.4 billion to buy and renovate Rouge Steel.

 

Severstal provides more than 10 percent of the flat-rolled carbon steel used by North American automakers for body structures and enclosures.

 

Now the company wants to expand its market share, Severstal North America President Sergei Kuznetsov said in an interview with Automotive News.

 

While Severstal's spending has been huge, Kuznetsov said it was essential to establish a presence in the automotive market.

 

"Automakers are going to have to meet fuel efficiency standards, and weight is a big issue," Kuznetsov said. "That's where we believe the industry is going."

Posted
GM's light-duty pickups were last redesigned in 1999.

 

Wrong,Try 2007 :rolleyes:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,837
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    bellssn690
    Newest Member
    bellssn690
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 2 Anonymous, 831 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Interesting, I suspect I would have fueled up in Lee Vining as the day prior I would have filled up either in Laughlin or near there and maybe again before I entered Death Valley and once out the other side late that evening as I kept on driving into the night up near Lee Vining. Next morning I most likely fueled up in LV before heading over Tioga Pass into ( as I refer to it as "Yose .... Mite" 😁 ). And again that was 19 years ago but the price then must not have jumped out at me like the 5 bill a gallon theme of nutty cult hippy country Big Sir or head so far up their rear Aspen. I'd be curious to know where the highest prices are in the lower 48, I probably would not be far off to guess somewhere in Cali forn ie. Coldfoot and Prudhoe bay may have those prices beat but that is a whole other world up there and when prices are more normal elsewhere that is about what they can be up there I believe in no mans land. Anyway interesting that the 395 corridor is hosing people and the thing is, its tourist season and its not like there are a lot of competition options when driving up that highway from what I could see. Yup, big ole Boaterhomes and various other RV's ahead and behind me at the Yosemite entrance gate and they have to get their fuel somewhere.  
    • Those can be high, as well as the big California cities. The ones that will pop your eyes out are the 395 corridor on the Eastern side of the Sierra Nevadas. Lee Vining, $7.19 for regular and $8.89 for diesel is what the Google said right now.
    • Correct.  2019-2021 model years are serviced by a different p/n.  19420611.  Recall 2021s use 19420611.   The recall engines 2022-2024 model years are serviced with 12740076.     The difference between 19420611 and 12740076 is GM changed injector size for 2022.  The injectors are smaller on 12740076 with smaller injector bores in the cylinder heads to match the smaller injectors.  So you can't install a 19420611 in a 2022-2024, and you can't install a 12740076 in a 2019-2021.     Both engines are the replacement engine p/ns that are in the L87 recall.  So both of these are the updated engines.     Here's a version of the L87 recall with the p/ns for all the parts needed.    RCRIT-25V274-7075.pdf   Note it shows 19420611 and 12740076 with an asterisk to a footnote "Use the VIN and the GM Electronic Parts Catalog (EPC) to determine which part to order if two or more part numbers are listed for the same part, as it may vary by vehicle options."    
    • Looking for advice from this group. Took my flawless 2020 6.2 TB to an unnamed shop for routine rear brakes and oil change. Tech forgot to put oil back in after the full service and needles to say, destroyed my engine.  It’s all on their shop video so they are responsible.   I had my Chevy dealer do the analysis and they confirmed its compromised and said engine replacement. The manager said they only get GM reman engines from GM with full 3 yr warranty and the one they would put in is not same as what’s they are swapping out on 21-25 for recall.    I am looking for advice why that would be a different engine because obviously I had the good 6.2 year and replacing it has my concerns with that recall for 21-15   Also what’s the pros and cons of accepting the engine swap vs telling the shop that bricked the truck to pay up so I buy a new truck. I’m concerned about stigma resale eventually if I just decide to get rid of it after the swap or other issues showing up after the swap out.  
    • Just looked up my records.  I've never gone over 5000 miles between oil changes.  At 46K miles, I have 10 oil changes.  I hope that will help.  I also installed the disabler last year.  I've still had a few times when it didn't seem to engage (which I can tell because the start stop feature kicks in), but for the most part, I think it's working.  For some reason, GM did not include the number of cylinders running in the information screen like I had on other models.  In my Cadillac, it shows me when it's running on 4 cylinders on the fuel milage screen.  I can't find that on my '21 Denali.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...