Jump to content

Problems


Recommended Posts

Posted

hey everyone, how ya'll doing today? i took my truck yesterday to have it fixed at a shop.i had a light on that was a po455. i read it it was a emissions large leak so i changed the cap allready to a brand new one so i knew that wasnt it. ive been having a p0446 which i think was the vent valve malf. if not that was the description i was getting. my fuel pump went out about a month ago so we pulled the bed and changed it out no problems. now right after i got the pumped changed no more p0446 but the po455 large leak. so at the shop yesterday and they pulled the tank and they found a emission line at a "t" that was broke. so they fixed it i dont know if they rigged it or what. left yesterday they ran it no lights or anything i drove it to the gas station on the way to the house. i filled up and left to go home not even 50ft i get a new code a po453 fuel pressure sensor high. its one damn thing after another lol. i cleared it and its came back on twice. so is this all related i dont think the code is saying the sensor could be bad but also this is a brand new pump with sensor on it. i still want to do the vent valve filter relocation and all that but damn what to do next. any help guys would be greatly appreciated thank you so much. oh yeah its a 03 4.8 4x4

Posted

I would assume that it has something to do with the tank vent. Try leaving the cap loose just a bit so some pressure can leak out. See if that resolves the issue. If it does, then your tank vent it clogged or not opening properly.

Posted

similar issues on my 08. dealer told me to stop "topping off" the tank because they think that is getting the vent valve wet and causing the codes that I was getting.

Posted

hey hrspwr when you mean vent do u mean the vent valve? ill try the cap.its kinda funny you said the dlewis i filled her up yesterday. i let it kick off then i didnt add anymore. damn problems you actually break down and pay someone else and they might fix that problem but then maybe create another maybe its just bad luck lol. thanks guys for all your help.

Posted

If I am not mistaken there should be a a breather on top of the sending unit, or a vent that controls the amount of pressure in the tank. I know on my brothers blazer his problem was that he did not have enough pressure(pressure was escaping from around the actual sensor). If you loosen the gas cap that should purge some of the pressure, but may take too much out and cause a low pressure code. So getting the right tightness is going to be a pain to see if the code goes away. On the good side of it all, if you clear the high pressure code and you get a low pressure code, then you know exactly what it is.

Posted
similar issues on my 08. dealer told me to stop "topping off" the tank because they think that is getting the vent valve wet and causing the codes that I was getting.

 

YES +1

 

 

 

BTW there is tons of info on this if you look in the "how to" and the "ask a GM technician" areas.

Posted

The P0453 has nothing to do with restrictions or leaks in the system. This is a purely electrical code. The PCM puts out a signal to the tank pressure sensor and reads what comes back. If the value that comes back is unreasonable this code sets. This particular code means that it's reading above 4.9volts meaning there was no drop. Since someone just had the tank down for repairs and the code sets constantly I would say they left it unplugged, pinched a wire or dammaged a connection. I would take it back.

Posted

Thanks everyone. Hey sparkstech your dead on man. But now i kinda dont trust the mechanic. Hell say ahh this wire was broke or burnt and charge me another 200 to pull the tank. I would like to pull the bed myself again and check. Is there a way to check the wires and sensor with a volt meter or ohm meter. Thanks so much. Fix one problem create another

Posted

I went out there this morning to look under the truck. I checked the pressure sensor was still plugged in. But now im pissed off. The whole front of the tank was hanging there they didnt even bolt the front strap back on. Luckily the bold was wedged in on the frame beside the tank. Do yall think when i filled the tank after i picked it up that the gas maybe went in the vaccum hole on the sensor. It was leaning pretty good. Wtf man pay people good hard earned money and they do this $hit

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • On the subject of OLM, Gm's OLM tool may be more "informed" than others brands. I recall OLM's in mid-2000's Chrysler products literally counting down a set number of miles. That's all the OLM appeared to be.    I would actually expect GM to be able to explain the parameters that their OLM takes into account from a high level. No, I would not expect them to disclose their software coding or data analysis around their parameters.   So we're talking about two different topics, so to continue the subject on the other one, I'd be curious to know how much "standard particulate matter" in fresh oil is able to be filtered at first start by a fresh oil filter. How much particulate matter is enough to "matter"?   I.e. how much of a "lever" do we think this equates to (variability in particulate content, in fresh oils, between different makes/brands, some which filter less, and some that filter more).   We can say that more particles = more wear = shorter engine life as a logical statement and use that data with a little marketing to scare people into selecting a more refined/filtered oil. Using a similie, is this like deciding to forego two alcoholic drinks in a lifetime because we're worried about the potential impact on lifespan? Are there numbers which translate the ISO test results into a quantifiable increase in wear for a given engine/use case?
    • I'm pretty sure it doesn't actually recalibrate the speedometer it just changes the wheel speed sensor inputs to the computer. The truck still thinks it has stock tires.
    • I apologize, I missed this post, at risk of going off CURRENT TOPIC.   I'm not saying it is BS, I'm questioning how much information is being held back. GM is NOT going to spell out exactly every parameter in the algorithm. Liability, intellectual property, etc.    I'm not naive enough to believe that it is as simple as revolutions, coolant temperature, miles, time; are you?    I don't do irrational either, and boiling the OLM down to four simple values that I could code in an afternoon (I'm not a coder) is irrational - unless it suits your agenda to ignore it. 
    • Chris 21 I appreciate your constructive response. !!  😉😉😉   The 6.6 is gas.  Correct me if I’m wrong but by recalibrating the speedo you’re correcting the shift points of the transmission on these trucks.?.
    • That is a huge misconception.     Bigger does not always equal safer.  Modifying does not make it safer either, with exceptions.   Think of this.  Your truck in stock form is capable of emergency maneuvers, proper stopping distances, its handling is designed around the factory wheel/tire packages, etc.   37s and a lift?  Now you've affected your braking distances, handling and ride control.  You've raised your center of gravity higher.  Your front visibility is now obstructed more than stock, same for your rear.  Does it look cooler?  Yes.  Does it now work as good as it did from factory on road?  NO.       As for my mention of exceptions?  Say you had a sedan or crossover.  They typically come with all season tires.  If you swap out for a performance all season or a summer tire, you improve your car by lowering its stopping distance (better braking because of traction) and improve the handling (regular and emergency) of the vehicle.  That is an actually improving modification.  My old 2019 LD 1500, I ran UHP all season tires on 20in wheels in a factory offered size.  It improved all aspects of how it drove over the Duratracs it came with from the factory in the stock 18" tire.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...