Jump to content

No Chevrolet Cruze Wagons


unit731

Recommended Posts

Posted

Mike Colias

Automotive News -- March 5, 2012

 

DETROIT -- Chevrolet's planned introduction this week of a European Cruze wagon at the Geneva auto show is sure to raise the question: How about selling the wagon in the United States? Or a Cruze hatchback? Or a coupe?

 

The answer to all three of those is an emphatic no -- at least for now, General Motors officials say.

 

GM's decision to steer clear of variants for its top-selling car diverges from the strategies of most competitors. Hyundai Motor America this spring will introduce a coupe and hatchback versions as it seeks an incremental sales boost for its compact Elantra. Last year Honda Motor Co. launched a redesigned Civic coupe. Ford launched its redesigned Focus last year in both a sedan and a hatchback.

 

GM's sedan-only strategy for the Cruze also runs counter to, well, old GM. The automaker always sold different body types of Cruze predecessors, the Cobalt and Cavalier, in the United States, and they were not as successful as the Cruze has been.

 

There are plenty of reasons why GM isn't chasing incremental volume by offering various Cruze flavors. But the main one is all about profit.

 

GM CEO Dan Akerson and CFO Dan Ammann have outlined a goal of increasing pretax global profit margins to 10 percent within the next several years, from 6 percent last year. Adding tooling to U.S. assembly plants would add costs that GM might struggle to cover given the anemic demand for wagons and hatchbacks in the United States.

 

"I think the right questions are being asked: Are you really going to be able to make enough money to justify the investment?" GM spokesman Tom Wilkinson said. "You risk adding a vehicle that might not sell as well as you had hoped, and then it hurts the margins."

 

Another factor: GM doesn't want to risk having a Cruze wagon cannabilizing sales of its hot-selling Chevy Equinox crossover. The wagon's dimensions are similar to the Equinox; it's just 3.7 inches shorter.

 

Jim Hall, principal of 2953 Analytics Inc., an automotive consulting firm in suburban Detroit, says U.S. demand for wagons is too weak to justify Cruze wagon sales here.

 

In Europe last year, wagons and hatches accounted for 51 percent of light-vehicle sales, according to IHS Automotive. In North America: 9 percent.

 

Hall says a hatch could be an option down the road -- GM already sells Cruze hatchbacks in Europe and Asia. But he believes a U.S. introduction wouldn't happen before GM releases a redesigned version, likely in 2015. Before then it would be too costly for GM to re-engineer a Cruze hatch to meet U.S. crash-test standards, for example.

 

"The old GM would have kept building body variants even though they were selling it in probably the sub-10,000-unit range" annually, Hall says. "Then they'd wonder, 'Why can't we make money on our small cars?'"

A Cruze coupe would face a small and crowded market of front-wheel-drive two-doors, Hall says. Instead, he thinks GM might add to Chevy's lineup a rear-wheel-drive concept coupe that GM showed at the Detroit auto show, dubbed the Code 130-R.

 

While GM is shying away from different Cruze body types for the United States, it will offer fresh powertrain versions. GM has said it will launch a diesel engine in the United States next year. Sources also have said that GM is considering a plug-in hybrid Cruze, though GM won't confirm that.

 

Duane Paddock, owner of Paddock Chevrolet in Kenmore, N.Y., says he doesn't think a hatchback, wagon or coupe would sell enough to justify the investment. Paddock, whose store was the nation's No. 2 Chevy dealer last year, with 4,353 units sold, said he would rather see Chevrolet offer an all-wheel-drive option.

 

Plus, he says the combination of body styles that used to populate Chevy's lineup created inventory headaches.

 

"We want to keep things simple, lower the build combinations, improve color selection," Paddock says. "We'd rather work on tweaking things, instead of reinventing things."

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,840
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    appletrav
    Newest Member
    appletrav
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 286 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • This is a 1/2 ton thing ONLY.  All HDs 2020-2026 have the two speed transfer case, with Autotrac as an option.     1/2 tons 2019-2026, regular 4x4s come with a single speed case (no 4LO!), and trucks with Z71 ordered, or all Trail Boss trucks come with the 2 speed case.  2 speed case is also an option on WT, and is also standard on High Country.  
    • 2013 5.3 still to this day calls for the PF48 filter.  Which as a 15psi bypass pressure.     There is a TSB, 17-NA-157 that talks about the PF-63 and PF-64 filters which have a higher bypass rating of 22psi.    TSB HERE - temp.xml   "Beginning in 2012, the oil pumps began to regulate main gallery feedback instead of pump out pressure. This means that the oil pump now does not begin to regulate until pressure is built up to the main gallery. This change reduces the amount of time it takes to provide oil to the engine bearing and lifters during extreme cold start conditions.  Main gallery feedback oil pump control systems are present on the following engine families which use Spin-on oil filters: Small Gas Engine (SGE), Large Gas Engine (LGE), High Feature (HFV6) Gen2 and Small Block Gen5 gasoline engines. These engines with the main gallery feedback oil pump control systems are factory built with an ACDelco® oil filters"   It also calls out what engines use those filters.  The gen 4 small blocks were not on that list (LMG, LC9, L9H, L92, L94, L20, L96).  Gen 5 small blocks use the higher pressure filter.          That all said...   Your 7045 Napa filter is the PF63 equivalent, with 22psi bypass.  You are already using the higher bypass pressure filter.  You CAN keep using it, you don't technically have to use it though.  
    • Do you know WHY the filter relief setting was increased to 22 psig?    When the new system goes into the second stage the pump volume ramps up considerably. It was found that the 15 psi filter bypass setting put the filter in bypass on a warm engine when the second stage was activated. Raising the filter bypass setting forced the filter to do what it designed to do. Filter. Preventing debris from circulating during high load, high rpm operation.    So next question is how did GM find this out? VLOM/lifter failures and a deep dive by Melling Corp.    Last question. Is it required? Look at it like this; a motor may be equipped with a rev limiter. But it only works if the set point in reached. That 22 psig setting only matters if the pressure differential across the filter media exceeds 15 psig during normal warm operation. Second stage kicks in around 3000-3500 rpm.    I can't answer your question because I don't know you and how you use the truck. But I think there is enough information here to let you decide for yourself. 😉
    • Probably not their first rodeo, so it should go as planned most likely.  Typically the service manager or tech doing the swap will put some seat time to shake it down after they get it all put back together.  We usually put 50-100mi before we hand them back so if something happens, its not after you get it.  A coolant leaks, oil leaks, a ground left off or loose, vibration, etc.     The new engines so far have been good?  There's been a couple that have popped out there again (the replacement engine) but most have been okay.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...