Jump to content

Body Lift or Suspension Lift


Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm looking at lifting my '01 GMC Sierra.  3" would be fine, which is what a body lift would provide.  However, I'm less than enthusiastic about cutting the lower valance below the front bumper, to clear the frame horns so they can "stick out" slightly.  Seems it would look a bit "back yard" to me.  The kit plus installation (I can afford to let someone else bust their knuckles) is a little over $700.  Takes one day to install.

 

4" also would be fine, which is what Rancho's suspension provides.  Not sure if I'd then have to look into larger tires and wheels, which I'm not too interested in swapping out.  I currently am running 265:16s on stock alloys.  The suspension plus installation, shocks, and alignment is a little over $2700.  Takes 3 days for the shop to do it all!  Seems kind of long.

 

I don't off-road, I just want the truck to sit higher, but I don't want it to look weird, whick I'm concerned would happen with the body lift.  I also don't want to spend more money than I can justify.  (I also want my cake and want to eat it as well.)

 

So, how do you handle the front frame horn issue with a lift kit?  Is there a way to keep the nubs from sticking out?  Will stock wheels fit with the Rancho suspension?  And what about the prices and labor times the shop quoted?  Seem reasonable?

 

Thanks - Dave

Posted

So, how do you handle the front frame horn issue with a lift kit?  Is there a way to keep the nubs from sticking out?  

Here's what I did with mine after adding a body lift.  I just cut the loop part of the frame horns off (leaving an 1/8 to 1/4 inch sticking out), that way I didn't have to cut the opening any bigger than needed.  I did still have to trim the opening a little around the area of the frame horn, so it wouldn't hit, but it wasn't much.  I did cut a notch in the bottom of the opening for the tow hooks to be mounted in the original location.  I was going to flip the hooks over and swap sides, but the holes for the bolts that install vertical wouldn't line up.  You could redrill a new hole in the frame and secure it with a nut, which I didn't think of until after I did what I did to mine, or add after market hooks, which I think would still require some drilling.  Some have flipped and swapped them and only installed the one bolt horizonally, but I didn't feel that was the best thing to do, as far as the strength of the tow is concerned.

 

tow_hooks_close.jpg

tow_hooks_close2.jpg

 

 

I don't think it turned out too bad, compared to having the whole frame horn sticking out of the air dam.

skid_plate3.jpg

skid_plate.jpg

 

Good luck.   :cheers:

Posted

As someone new to full size trucks, but having a ton of experience with Jeeps and off road driving, my philosophy has always been to do a suspension lift because a body lift will only gain you clearance over the tires (not the frame, etc) and create a large ugly gap between the bumpers/frame and body.  I can spot a body lift a mile away.

 

Suspension lifts give you the clearance of the entire vehicle, save the axles, and has a better overall look.  As well, you get greater articulation of the axles when off road.

 

Because you are not going off road and are doing it for looks, its your choice but I still think body lifts look bad.  If you put a 4" lift on with stock tires they will look like pizza cutters.  Why don't you try cranking the torsion bars for a 1.5" lift (or use the Ford keys for 2-3") and add a Zero rate spring to the rear.  This will give you 2-3" in front and back and not make those tires look too small, and won't give you the strange look of a body lift.

 

Chad

Posted

Nah, I don't think thye look that bad, if done right.

 

truck_trailer.jpg

 

The only gap I have is from the bottom of the rear bumper and the trailer hitch, which doesn't bother me, but I've seen some people custom make some stuff to hide that gap.  The Performance Accesories kit for the new trucks comes with both front and rear lift brackets for the bumpers.  Naturally, there is a gap between the body and frame that can be seen in the wheel wells, but that's fixed easily with gap guards, which can be made at home also.  Trimming the front air dam the way I did wasn't too noticable.  The frame was more visible, but not too noticable after I but modified my step rails to lift them up a little. :cheers:

Posted
Cant wait to get my body lift on. It seems it looks better is you have nerf bars on it. 3 inches goes a long ways in style. If you flip the tow hooks over is that going to affect how they work? :cheers:  :(
Posted
Cant wait to get my body lift on. It seems it looks better is you have nerf bars on it. 3 inches goes a long ways in style. If you flip the tow hooks over is that going to affect how they work? :cheers:  :(

If you flip them, only one of the two bolts will line up.  I didn't want to sacrifice the strength of them by only using bolt for looks.  I have thought since then that you may be able to redrill a new hole for the bolt that installs vertically.  Or, you could install some aftermarket hooks on the sides of the frame rails, which would still require drilling a new hole for most hooks.

Posted
Nice truck tom.  Nothing like having a big rig to haul out the desert toys.  When you getting the suspension lift?  

 

:cheers:

Thanks.

 

LOL, I think I'll have to will the lottery or something like that before any suspension lift.   :(

Posted

Why don't you try cranking the torsion bars for a 1.5" lift (or use the Ford keys for 2-3") and add a Zero rate spring to the rear.  This will give you 2-3" in front and back and not make those tires look too small, and won't give you the strange look of a body lift.

 

Chad mentioned using Ford keys and a Zero rate spring to the rear.  Can someone enlighten me on "Ford keys"?  The "Zero rate spring" I think I can research on my own, but hey, if you know about that also, I'm all ears.

 

I like the concept, if it means not having to screw around with the bumpers and cutting out the valence to clear the nerf horns on the frame.  Plus, 2 - 3 inches would be just fine with me for a lift.

 

Thanks guys - Dave

Posted

Couple pics of my HD w/ body lift on my website at the bottom of post.

I've always had suspension and body lifts together in the past. Although I guess that's now "not recommended". Anyways, if all you want is a size or 2 bigger tires and clearance for it go with a body lift. Like MountaineerTom said the only real noticeable spot is the rear hitch. Cover the frame on the sides with steps or bars.

 

On older trucks like my old Blazers "gap guards" or "lift lips" weren't really available and bumper relocating brackets had to be made yourself or not used. Thats why most people frown on bodylifts. All my old Blazers you could see right through them from the sides! And the bumpers were 3" lower than they should be.

 

If you want to keep the factory comfortable ride, and don't need extreme flexability, and dont want to spend a couple grand (for these new sus lifts), go with the body lift.  My HD w/ 305's and 3" body lift will go anywhere my blazer with 6" suspension and 35" tires would ever go.

 

OK, almost. It is a few feet longer than the old blazer! :D

 

KK

Posted

I have a question about body lifts also, do you have to modify the exhaust tailpipe at all or does it just hang 3 inches lower?  maybe this is a stupid question but I don't know much about bodylifts.  Thanks

 

Mike

Posted
I have a question about body lifts also, do you have to modify the exhaust tailpipe at all or does it just hang 3 inches lower?  maybe this is a stupid question but I don't know much about bodylifts.  Thanks

 

Mike

You don't "have to", but it is different looking.

 

Here's a before shot:

tlightcvrs_rear.JPG

 

And and after shot:

rear_bumper_lifted.jpg

 

And a close up one of the spacers:

bumper_spacers.jpg

 

A few people have made some custom spacers to fill in that area a little better, and one guy custom made a spacer out of some type of tubing (like step rails are made of) to follow the contours of the frame mounted hitch.  It all depends on how you want it to look, and your recources too I guess.

 

As of now, my exhaust tips are cut off and dump down towards the ground after they go over the rear axle.  The reason I cut them off was because the chrome tips started to rust pretty bad, just havn't got around to having them re done.  Whe I do, I think I may go with a set up like chevy4x4trucks did with his Silverado, but try to get them tucked up a little tighter to the body.  I think he had a Flowmaster system that hadn't been modified to tuck them closer when he took this pic.

P1010016.JPG

 

Oh yeah, another plus side to a body lift was it only cost me $210-$215 for the lift from JC Whitney and nothing for the install because me, my brother and some buddies installed it.  :thumb:   The gap guards did cost $50 though.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,256 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • So I'm in the middle of a DOD AFM delete on my 6.2 L86 Sierra. I had a pick holding the tensioner but after I got the Cam phaser gear off I was cleaning off all the rtv and apparently I didn't have the pick seated far enough in. I bumped it and the tensioner sprang forward.  I think everything is good but I want a second opinion. The top of the tensioner is just a looped piece of plastic that rides in that channel right? There is no spring or anything is there? I got the gear and chain back on and it seems tight and everything looks right. I'm hoping nothing fell out.
    • My 2015 1500 LTZ Silverado suddenly won't go into 4 x 4 low. It will go into 4 x 4 high.
    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...