Jump to content

2014 Silverado - 20 x 10 -24 offset - Can I fit 275/55r 20 without lif


Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello everyone,

 

I recently purchased a new set of rims 20 x 10 -24 for my 2014 Silverado.

 

I was wondering if it is possible to use my stock tires on these rims until I put on a lift?

Eventually wanting to get a 6 inch lift and run 33's, but that will not be until next year sometime.

 

Anyone done this or is it even possible?

 

Thanks for any help you can give me.

Posted

i must put 20 x 10 with -24mm rims on my truck with 33x12.50 tires. i had a 3.5 inch zone combo lift installed. so a 2 inch level and a 1 and half inch body lift. and my tires barely clear. so good luck bro

Posted

Yeah that us what I figured. I WAS ON CUSTOM OFFSETS Web page and the are some people claiming they are clearing 33 12.50 with just a 2.5 RC leveling kit. Some say just a slight rub. Others say there is no way.

Not sure if I should chance it and go that route fir now or just be patient and save up for my 6 inch lift.

Posted

I have a similar setup but 305-55-20 but with a 3" level and it rubbed so I just slit the carpet fender and zip tied it back and hammer in some of the sheet metal to be on the safer side. No more rubbing since and you can't really tell that is cut back there.

 

2014 Silverado 2WT CC Summit White 4.3L V6

DROPKICK Edition

IG: jorge_dropkick_rangel

Posted

Thanks for the relpies. Im trying to decide if I should buy a leveling kit for now so I can run my stock tires until they are worn out. I'm not sure how it will look with the stock tires since they are not very aggressive. I tried to look for pics of a setup like thus but did not find anything.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,760
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    MASONV88888888
    Newest Member
    MASONV88888888
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 981 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I usually do as well or better than the sticker for mileage. Usually better going west than east. North then South. Wind makes a difference. I’m not usually a conspiracy theorist. But it did dawn on me I’m going by the vehicle calculation. Now that would be interesting.
    • https://www.msn.com/en-us/autos/news/fuel-economy-stickers-don-t-tell-the-whole-story-aaa-data-reveals-why/ar-AA26ocHk?ocid=winp2fptaskbarhover&cvid=6a4122ea3dae47e5b8dfbed5d4fd3d55&cvpid=648f6b4fc2fa4eddb4c12893aeb957ed&ei=59
    • What’s missing in all this is patience and investment in the future. Buy a 170K starter home. Ten years later sell it invest in a more expensive home. Eventually you’ll have a 600K home and pay starter home payments. Buy a starter car. Maintain it well. Save the payments after it’s payed for then buy an expensive car if you desire. Buy a tumbler make your own coffee, pack your lunch. Cook your own dinner. Most importantly take care of your car.
    • People mislead themselves. Statistics are highly useful indicators.   Here's the tie-in to this thread. If an oil sample tests shows a wear indicator of 7 using cheaper ACDelco oil, and a wear indicator of 2 (lower = less wear) using a particular brand of Mobil oil, and wear has a linear relationship with engine lifespan, anyone could assume that Mobil is reducing wear by more than 50% (let's just say a 200% reduction for you red state people trying hard to do math) which leads to increasing engine life by 2x. Perhaps, in a vacuum, by itself, when dreamed by AI.   Yeah?! That's what the statistic is saying, isn't it?   No, it isn't. It didn't come out and say engine life is doubled. That's a very bad assumption, and a case of severe myopia by assuming something potentially untrue about the only data point in focus.   Average cost of a new car is 50k. You bet it is.   The median cost of a new car is more like 35k. Expensive cars are skewing the perception that "average" now means a $50k price of entry for a very average automobile. And that's not true. People who don't understand statistics twist the living heck out of them to mean all sorts of things they don't actually mean.   "Average" new car payment is $1000/month. Yep, it is. And in that number are all the $35k new car buyers who bring significant equity, and the $25k new car buyers who finance the car for a month just to get a rebate, and then pay it off. Know what isn't in that number? All the payments made by people who don't finance a car.   Picking one's own data point (don't have a car payment, never paid $50k for a new vehicle, my house cost $170k, I afforded a middle class lifestyle on $4.50/hr) is just a data point. Just like earning $25/hr in an area where the median home price is almost $1 Million is a data point. In fact, it's a lot of data points given that 80% of the US population lives in/around major cities. They're not idiots; the vast majority of them do it to make a living because that's where the big money is.   The highs have become higher, lows have become lower, and how your personal mileage varies is not truth for an entire country. At the same time you can't NOT acknowledge the data. While it doesn't paint YOUR personal picture, it certainly tints the reality that you also live in, as does your single data point.    
    • Glad you had success with it. I did as well, but about 5-6 months later it returned. Tried again, same result. This was after the dealer made several attempts and never even got it to slow down.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...