Jump to content

RC Car/Truck guys


Shaners

Recommended Posts

Posted

The OS engine in my Tmaxx is getting weak and has never really impressed me too much (although it was better after I ported it and Knifed the rod).

 

I'm considering the new XTM .18 rear exhaust engine as a replacement this year.  Rear exhaust is natural for these little powerhouses so that should help and the larger displacement should make a difference too.

 

I was wondering if anyone has run an XTM racing engine in their trucks or buggies, and how durable are they and how well do they hold a tune?

 

Happy RC'ing!!!

 

post-52-47855-Image12__2_.jpg

Posted
I have a trinnity and a nova rosi and have had awesome luck with them.
Posted
Shaners, you may also want to try Traxxas' 2.5. Not sue if it's a direct fit but that would definitely get you the power you want  :)
Posted
Shaners, you may also want to try Traxxas' 2.5. Not sue if it's a direct fit but that would definitely get you the power you want  :)

I don't know if it will fit either.  I know the Traxxas 2.5 is a hot motor, but it would also need the rear header exhaust kit, and it is still a .15 motor.

 

I was hoping my Tmaxx with an .18 rear exhaust would be quicker than the new 2.5 (.15) Traxxas Tmaxx.  I just don't know much about XTM Racing, and how good their motors are...

Posted
I know alot of guys use Novarosi but they are expensive. Have you thought about rebuilding yours? It sure is a  cheaper alternative...
Posted
I know alot of guys use Novarosi but they are expensive. Have you thought about rebuilding yours? It sure is a  cheaper alternative...

This motor has been rebuilt before and it was ported when the rebuild was done.  It's an OS CVX.15 with a different head on it and was a fine motor.

 

I've seen some el-cheapo Megatech motors that scream for less than $100.

 

I have an Ofna Hyper .21 in my 4x4 buggie and really like it, and I think I'll try this .18 from XTM and be the test mule for my Tmaxx.  I'm running a OS .12 in my RC-10 GT.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,945
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    thefultonhow
    Newest Member
    thefultonhow
    Joined
  • Who's Online   6 Members, 0 Anonymous, 682 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Thanks - I wasn't quite caffeinated this morning. 2:1 makes sense, turning the crankshaft 360 degrees will turn the cam 180 degrees, and had I done that, the cam's dot would be at 6 and the crank's at 12 again.   I went ahead and took the sprocket off anyway, aligned everything dot-to-dot including the balance shaft just for s&g. I'm glad I did because I discovered no Loctite on the timing sprocket bolts. Maybe it's not required, but at only 20 ft-lb torque spec, those bolts aren't in there very tight. Cleaned and reassembled with some thread locker and torqued.   A general observation: Less is more with RTV. If a little doesn't stop a leak, a LOT probably won't, either. RTV is thinly veiled revenge, in a tube...      
    • The timing marks are ok, that is #1, you can turn it over until they line up and it won't change anything, the crankshaft turns twice for every camshaft revolution, I have always set up SB Chevs as your pic shows using a straight edge
    • Someone's been here before.... There is a receipt for a 3-piece timing set, purchased earlier this year.   Is this picture something, or, nothing?   I have the timing cover off and my crank is perfectly TDC and the keyed gear's locating mark is dead on 12 o'clock.   The cam gear locating mark is also at 12 o'clock. Now, I'm not an expert, but all the install guides say the two locating marks should meet and be perfectly aligned when installing a timing set. The mark on the crank should be dead on 12:00 and the cam gear's mark should be dead on 6:00, and both marks should be perfectly vertically aligned.   I believe the timing gear is keyed or has a dowel that ensures it can only be installed on the cam in one position, so I have to believe the cam is out of phase somehow. At the very least, with a triangular bolt pattern, it can only be installed in one of 3 different positions.   Before I pulled the front cover, the truck was running alright, no service engine soon lights except an occasional P0172 / rich condition. Timing -16 timing at idle (should be +16), and total -35% fuel trim, two conditions I haven't been able to figure out.   In related news, my injector tested pretty well, wasn't leaking, but I had it rebuilt anyway, and it's on it's way back to me.         Along with this discovery, the good and bad:   Good: The oil pan seal appears undamaged.   Bad: -The timing cover has been reused, and the positioning dowels have been broken. That could explain some of the leaking. -Some kind of white paste or grease was used to try to seal the oil pan seal and timing cover (since wiped off..). -Then, someone globbed silicone all over the front of the cover and also buried the ckp sensor in it. But, they didn't put any inside the cover or use RTV to try to seal the oil pan seal with the timing cover (good).
    • The guy that owns K&P filters last I checked in with him has over 300,000 miles on his Dodge base Hemi using his own 35 micron absolute stainless mesh filter from its first oil change.    The GM study I've posted a dozen times shows the relationship in engine life based in multiples of base units, not miles or years. That is the base unit is the number of miles the motor ran using the reference filter efficiency.    The above two paragraphs dismantle anecdotal arguments IF one changes oil often enough to prevent particle formation and the motor is in otherwise good shape. That is not full of silica (no air filter) or suffering a metallurgical issue that is not part of the lubrication discussion. Poor heat treat in example.   Data from UOA's I've reviewed from more than a few engines can show remarkably broad variations in oil cleanliness using the exact same filter over the course of an engines life.     Lastly there is the common sense of it. Wear debris WILL circulate the engine BEFORE it ever sees a filter in route to that filter and WILL harm the pump which NEVER sees filtered oil.    Alpha question then becomes, given the facts, how long do you believe is a reasonable service life from a vehicle you are certain you will not pass down? That is the junk yard will be it's resting place when you're done with it? (the moral issue most don't care about).    Omega question is then how diligent are you prepared to be in general mechanical, air & oil maintenance? Preventing particulates and keeping them sufficiently dilute; preventing the precursors from generation, amalgamation and precipitation.    If I get a good look at the engine bay of a vehicle I have a fair idea of the owners commitment to the inside of the power train. That 30 micron WIX is still more efficient than a sieve.                 
    • It also depends on what criteria someone is using for “best” when talking filters.  Are we going off best efficiency?   Best quality/QC?  Etc. because the two may not mutually exclusive.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...