Jump to content

Maxx Cam 5 Level Kit, Does anyone have one?, comments?

baddiesel
 Share

Recommended Posts

baddiesel Enthusiast

baddiesel

Posted
Posted

I've spent quite some time researching lifts and level kits. I've decided to install a level kit that can be installed without cutting or drilling. At $306.99, seems to be a decent price. Haven't decided on rims and tires yet, still researching info. This is a "selectable" torsion bar key, that does not over stress the manufacturers limits on the torsion bars.....according to Suspension Maxx. At any rate, all the vendors seem to perform the same method of leveling. I'm not exceeding 2.5 inches of lift. I'd appreciate any review comments or info. Thanks. By the way, this is for a 2016 2500HD, crew cab, WT, 6.5 ft bed with stock 18" steel wheels.

miker2702 Enthusiast

miker2702

Posted
Posted

save your money buy shock spacers and control arms and use the factory bars.

order you a set of differential spacers and be done with it. stress is stress raising is raising

its going to ride rougher just the say it is. control arms will keep you off the bump stops.

a lot of advertising that is no more than advertising on lots of these lifts. it will not ride like

stock cranking the bars no matter what method or product you use. now the bds kit

is another story.

boynton6spd Enthusiast

boynton6spd

Posted
Posted

I've spent quite some time researching lifts and level kits. I've decided to install a level kit that can be installed without cutting or drilling. At $306.99, seems to be a decent price. Haven't decided on rims and tires yet, still researching info. This is a "selectable" torsion bar key, that does not over stress the manufacturers limits on the torsion bars.....according to Suspension Maxx. At any rate, all the vendors seem to perform the same method of leveling. I'm not exceeding 2.5 inches of lift. I'd appreciate any review comments or info. Thanks. By the way, this is for a 2016 2500HD, crew cab, WT, 6.5 ft bed with stock 18" steel wheels.

I'm looking at the kit as well!

I like that it includes shock and diff spacers!

baddiesel Enthusiast

baddiesel

Posted
  • Author
Posted

miker2702, is the BDS kit a "leveling kit"?

 

boynton6spd, I called Suspension Maxx today. I asked them If I raise the truck 2.5 inches, would a 34" tall, 11" wide tire rub, and the representative told me "no, it would not". I also asked if I needed to replace the upper control arms, in order to prevent rubbing, and his response was also "no". So.....I went further with soliciting questions regarding fitment. I asked him if I installed factory 18" aluminum alloys (eg have proper backspacing and offset), with Michelin LTX M/S2 295/70R/18, load range E, would there be any issues rubbing(?) And again, his response was "no". He mentioned that sticking to factory spec wheels was a lot easier, and a lot less problems. I'm trying to make good choices with this application. My truck is a daily long distance driver, so I kinda prefer a tire that I can get the most mileage. I rotate my tires and change my oil/oil filter every 5K miles. Yep, I've got OCD. Thanks for your comments!

miker2702 Enthusiast

miker2702

Posted
Posted

Bds is the more expensive kit

Being offered. Should have a better than stock ride. There is a thread in last few days on here if some one putting one on.

There is a reason cognito sells

So many control arms. Once you tighten the bar suspension travel is limited. Not rubbing

Just doesn't mean tires. Frame stop and upper control arms

Can be annoying.search threads on here many discussions on the subject.

baddiesel Enthusiast

baddiesel

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I gotcha' miker. I researched the 2-3" BDS coilover lift that eliminates the torsion bars all together. It looks very high tech, and at that price, it should be. I really do like it, I'm going to call the local authorized installer for a price on the installation. *One thing that I did not like...the only stock rim I can use is the 20" x 9". I do not like 20's at all. I prefer a 17" or a 18", but in this application, it will have to be an aftermarket rim. I do not know what the correct offset or backspacing is required. I don't like the look of "outriggers" on my truck. I wanted to run Michelin LTX MS2 295 x 70R x ? I don't know if Michelin makes a bigger LTX than that. Thanks again for the info. The BDS is quite a bit more expensive, but since this will be my last truck before retiring, I would like to do this truck "right" the first time.

miker2702 Enthusiast

miker2702

Posted
Posted (edited)

if money is not a big concern I would look seriously into eliminating the torsion bars etc.

I hate 20s as well I bought some for my work truck but still driving around on the stock

steel wheels. but the trade off in ride I could learn to like the 20s. look to the bottom of

the page when you first open the forum and ask the guy his opinion.

 

http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/topic/202235-bds-coil-over-2-3-kit-installed-on-2500hd/

Edited by miker2702
baddiesel Enthusiast

baddiesel

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Miker: Thanx, I appreciate the info. Looks like all I have to do, is research an aftermarket 17" x 9" or 18" x 9" wheel. I've picked out an installer/vendor in Charlotte, and he recommended a website to visit. Again, I really appreciate the info, I'm not a young guy, and I want a nice smooth ride. I use my 1977 CJ7 for off road, but my truck must remain reliable, and not abused.

  • Like 1
baddiesel Enthusiast

baddiesel

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Talked to an authorized vendor/installer yesterday. He said to look at 17 x 9's or, 18 x 9"(8 x 180mm bolt pattern) with 5.5" backspacing. Just thought I'd share some helpful info, if you prefer something other than stock 20's. I prefer a larger tire profile, and they're a little cheaper on your wallet.

miker2702 Enthusiast

miker2702

Posted
Posted

Glad it worked out for you.

I'm not a experts at all on these truck s. Went looking

For a.used 1/2 ton ended up

With a new 2016 2500 crew 4wd

For 29k.couldn't stand the severe rake they have.

  • Like 1
baddiesel Enthusiast

baddiesel

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Congrats on your new truck. I had a 2016 1/2 ton for about a month, and got rid of it. That cylinder de-activation, and clueless transmission shifting and vibrating turned me off. I could put 1500 lbs in the back and it was too much for the truck. I'm glad I went with the HD2500, it shifts flawlessly, and hauls the weight. It might be a bit thirsty, but I am more than willing to pay the price for a decent running truck. Plus, it's very comfortable.

4wdriver Enthusiast

4wdriver

Posted
Posted

Congrats on your new truck. I had a 2016 1/2 ton for about a month, and got rid of it. That cylinder de-activation, and clueless transmission shifting and vibrating turned me off. I could put 1500 lbs in the back and it was too much for the truck. I'm glad I went with the HD2500, it shifts flawlessly, and hauls the weight. It might be a bit thirsty, but I am more than willing to pay the price for a decent running truck. Plus, it's very comfortable.

Glad yours shifts flawlessly mine is often confused

  • 5 years later...
henny123 New Member

henny123

Posted
Posted

Maxx Cam 5 Level Kit is a great addition to any home studio or music room. This kit includes everything you need to record in a professional studio setting: two mics and two stands, a control room monitor stand, and a headphone amp. The Maxx Cam 5 Level Kit is the perfect choice for recording vocals, acoustic instruments, and electric bass. It provides an excellent audio experience with minimal noise. And best of all, this kit is affordable and easy to use. If you're looking for a budget-friendly solution for recording in your home studio, then Maxx Cam 5 Level Kit is the perfect choice for you.

heardle

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined

  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,615 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • SFC Retired
      2023 DRW Wheel Liners

      By SFC Retired · Posted

      Did have to make 1 modification because of the WeatherTech rear mud flaps and that was needing 3 longer screws than what came with the install package. 😄
    • SFC Retired
      2023 DRW Wheel Liners

      By SFC Retired · Posted

      Picked up the liners yesterday. Installed passenger side WITHOUT any modifications. All mounting holes lined up perfectly. Rain is interfering today with drivers side. Very Happy! Will add pics when finished
    • KARNUT
      OCI, not when but why?

      By KARNUT · Posted

      As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That makes sense, and I agree with most of that.   I think the product would need both: 1. a default powertrain template, so it is useful out of the box; 2. user-selected priority parameters, so the owner or shop can choose what they want to see first.   Different users are going to care about different things. One owner may care about oil pressure and voltage. Another may care about misfire trend, AFM/DFM behavior, or U-codes. A shop may want communication events and repeatability first. Your baseline point is probably the most important one. Raw data is not very useful unless the report can show what normal looked like for that vehicle under similar conditions.   The way I would think about it is: - start with a basic known-good baseline - learn normal behavior for that specific vehicle over time - allow the event to be overlaid against baseline - show whether the event was a one-time spike or a repeatable pattern - provide a simple severity level, but with clear limits on what that severity means   For example, early severity could be something like: - Info: event captured, no obvious abnormal pattern - Watch: value moved outside baseline, but not repeated - Warning: repeatable abnormal pattern under similar conditions - Critical: communication loss, voltage drop, bus-off, reset, or severe repeated event   I would not want the first version to say “replace this part.” That would be overclaiming unless there is repair-confirmed data behind it. It would be more honest to say “this pattern deserves inspection.”   On the OBD port question, I think OBD absolutely has a role. OBD is probably the right place for: - DTCs - freeze frame - VIN - calibration information - normal scan-tool parameters - Mode 6 / enhanced diagnostic data if available The reason I am still looking at an ECM-side recorder is that the failure may happen before anyone connects a scan tool. If the owner plugs in a scanner after the event, the pre-event evidence may already be gone unless the ECU happened to save it. So I do not see this as “OBD versus ECM-side.” I see it more like: - ECM-side recorder: always armed, rolling buffer, event evidence - OBD/DLC companion: DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration, normal scan data - phone/cloud: status, notes, upload, report generation, notifications   I agree that phone connection and push notifications would be useful. I just would not want the phone or cloud connection to be required for capture. The recorder should save the event locally even if the phone is not connected. The phone should help with event marking, download, notes, upload, alerts, and report viewing.   For a default GM V8 event report, would this list make sense? - RPM - calculated load / MAP - throttle position - vehicle speed - gear / torque converter state if available - coolant temperature - oil pressure - oil temperature if available - battery voltage - commanded AFM/DFM state if available - actual AFM/DFM state if available - misfire counters / roughness by cylinder if available - fuel trims - relevant U-codes / communication events - bus-off / lost periodic message / module reset / voltage drop events Which of those would you remove, and what would you add?

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...