Jump to content

Removing the cats?


Recommended Posts

Posted

I've been thinking about doing this for about a month or so.

 

has anyone here done this with a 1996 tahoe with dual exhaust? if so how much louder is it, and did you gain anything in performance? did you get the rear O2 sensor simulators?

Posted

 

:P Bad idea. More noise, you may get an ses light, you won't pass state emissions test and you'll be polluting the air. The gain, if any, in performance will be negligible. Headers and and a good catback system is all you need and you'll be legal. Make sure the parts have a C.A.R.B number.

Posted

I dont think that would be a good idea. That 350 needs some backpressure. I dont know exactlly good or bad it will run. But I dont think it would be a wise idea. Im not too familiar with the 96 Hoe's and how the O2's are set up. In front of and rear of the cat. If there is an O2 sensor behind the cat you will need a Sim. Otherwise that SES light will stare you in the face for all eternity! Just leave the cats be and get a good cat-back and some headers like AZ1500 said. That aught to make you some nice HP numbers.

Posted

i have alot of friends with 350's. 1995 and up. but there all trucks

and stanard. but i have seen automatic also. they require no sensors

but they are loud with strait pipes. they have not harmed any of my friends

trucks so i would not worry about it

:P

Posted

I did this with my 91 camaro. I didn't have any issues. I've heard of later cars that if the O2 sensor wasn't working right the car ran like crap though. When they did mine they hollowed out the cat and put the straight pipe right through it. We don't have any emission tests here in Iowa, but a cop will take a look under your car to see if you have cats or a muffler.

Posted
what exactly IS a catback system? and what's a good one. like my signature already says, I already have the original 40 series flowmaster mufflers.

Catback is just a bolt up system that replaces the pipes and muffler from the cat back.

Posted

well. there was a place around there that said they'd redo all my piping from the headers back and use my original mufflers (and gut the cats) for like 150 bucks. is that a good idea? so are the pipes from the cat back usually bigger?

Posted

If you decide to remove the cats and your truck being OBDII compliant, you will have to get O2 simulaters (O2 simms for short). These plug into the wiring harness where the factory post cat O2 sensor used to be and trick the PCM into thinking all is well and that the post cat sensors are adjusting the trims in accordance with the pre-cat O2's. This will keep you from getting an SES light. You can also remove your Secondary A.I.R. system if you remove the cats also as it will no longer be needed.

 

Other than that it's a noise and inspection issue.

Posted

I am not familiar with the Wester's tuning.

 

The only time you need O2 Simms is if you physically remove ( or simply disconnect them from the wiring pigtail) the post cat O2 sensor(s) and cap the hole(s).

  • 2 months later...
Posted

On a stock vortec, you need adequate backpressure or your performance will significantly decrease.

 

My 98 K1500 RC SB 350 Manual trans 3.73 -has the normal bolt ons, and ive tried no cats (with Casper's o2 simulators), stock cats, and Random Technologies hi flow cats, all with a 50 series flowmaster dual inlet dual outlet with dual rear tailpipes.

 

No cats sound the best (and loudest), but my truck was a dog below 3500rpm.

Overall power was down and so was throttle-response.

 

The Random hi flow units worked the best, and were only slightly quieter than no cats. Performance with these was better than stock, and the sound was throatier, however, the SES light came on after about 20k.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.6k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    343,007
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Brendan C
    Newest Member
    Brendan C
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 856 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • You're better read than that Atlas. 😏   British science fiction writer Arthur C. Clarke formulated three adages that are known as Clarke's three laws, of which the third law – that "any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic" – is the best known and most widely cited.   Stribeck and the pivotable Hersey Number isn't voodoo nor snake oil. That part is physics. It's what marketing and bean counters do with it that is snake oil and voodoo.    Stribeck is the relationship between Hersey and the Coefficient of Friction. Within the Hersey Equation if viscosity and viscosity is 'Dependent' on.......heat.......and.......viscosity index or the temperature to viscosity slope.    Specifically Hersey is the viscosity AT THE TEMPERATURE IN THAT LOCATION FOR THAT SLOPE.   Hydrodynamic lubrication exist when the film thickness in the location is 3X the Ra roughness of the surface. This is irrespective of the hardness of the substrate. To obtain that thickness X viscosity is required for Y velocity at Z load. That's a lot of moving parts. It is also impossible to maintain in an ICE but nearly possible with a turbine under constant load.    What does that mean? Error heavy and operate light. Wear is inevitable but the rate of wear and the milage obtainable are a function of prevailing conditions and HABITS. The only penalty is viscous drag and at fractions so low as to be well worth the effort. Double the life, half the manufacturing carbon foot print. Greed is the only impediment.    The materials generated by SwRI are the RESULT not an estimation or a hypothesis.    Don't delude yourself sir, EV's have as many pitfalls as ICE's. We just don't know what they are yet and it will take longer to sort as MARKETING and GREEDY CEO's have had more time to polish the turd they are selling. 
    • You can always count on greed to prey on ignorance and stupidity.    Friend bought a 2019 Ford Flex and asked me about using Valvoline R&P 5W30 in it. Told him give the miles on it and the fact it wasn't yet using oil that it was a good plan. He uses a Valvoline quick change shop for his oil service.   First they tell him that isn't the oil the OEM recommends. He told them he didn't care what the OEM thought. Then they floated the, "But it will void your warranty"    His reply was it's a 2019, there is no warranty and informed them their knowledge of the law was lacking.    Then they tell him 'But it will ruin your motor"!.    Mine to ruin he says. Finally they give in and charge him 150% the semi-syn price    Point it the brainwash is so embedded that even the service industry is drunk on their swill. The public is right behind them. Echoing the same lies on every forum and media platform. If the end goal is indeed EV then I'd say that ship is about built. 
    • Diesel hit $6.00 here today at the truck stop.   Payed $2.79 for E85 today too.
    • Thanks for posting, I'm sure it will help someone
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...