Jump to content

Bilstein leveling kit - 08 1500 4wd V8

thezentree
 Share

Recommended Posts

thezentree Enthusiast

thezentree

Posted
Posted

Hey all, new here and have a 08 Sierra 1500 V8 4wd that needs new shocks. It's currently got a RC 2" strut spacer leveling kit and 285s on it, but the shocks are factory and it's got 210k miles on it. They are done, to say the least. I think I have an idea of what I want, just wanted to run it past y'all in case I'm about to order the wrong parts. Before anyone jumps my sh*t, I did search and couldn't find a thread that cleared this up, but that's not to say I didn't miss something.

 

Front:

Bilstein shocks P/N 24-186940, with the spring seat clip set in the top groove, factory springs, and no RC spacer. I want to keep it as low as I can while still clearing the 285s with no cutting, so if I can get away with a lower groove, let me know.

 

Rear:

Bilstein rear shocks P/N 24-293082. Maaaybe and ORD zero rate in the rear to add an inch to the rear so it's not squatted when loaded? I am assuming that the rear shocks I listed above will work with 1" lift in the rear?

 

Thanks in advance.

Lurchenstein Enthusiast

Lurchenstein

Posted
Posted

I am interested in this as well.

I am looking in to,

front

Bilstein 6112

rear

bilstein 5160

wheels 18x9.5  -18 offset

tires 

goodyear wrangler duratrac 295/65/18

 

Gtschwifty Enthusiast

Gtschwifty

Posted
Posted (edited)

2012 Silverado 1500 V8(LC9) 6l80 4WD extended cab 6'6" bed WT.

 

Just ordered the B8 6112 with 5100's for the rear. 765 shipped 

 

Stock wheels and 265/70r17 tires for the time being 

 

Edited by Gtschwifty
Gtschwifty Enthusiast

Gtschwifty

Posted
Posted (edited)

Thezentree we need more detail. 285 is only the width. Need aspect ratio, rim size, offset to have any idea of what you're working with. I think you're on the right path with top notch in the front and adding an inch in the rear. Should net 1.25" MORE rake than you currently have. If that's too much I'd look into a different block in the rear or having one milled to achieve however much rake you're after. If it were me I'd order just the struts and shocks with those part numbers you posted(seems to be about $357 on shocksurplus with SHOCKD 5% promo code) set it at the top notch, drive it a while, load it, measure it, then decide what(if any) lift you would like in the rear. I can't see it being more than an inch so your rear shocks would be ready. Also with 210,000 miles on factory struts you may stand to benefit with a kyb top hat with bearing and spring seat ($40 per strut on rockauto) since you're swapping those over to the 5100s anyways it would be the time to do it.

Edited by Gtschwifty
  • Like 1
thezentree Enthusiast

thezentree

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 hours ago, Gtschwifty said:

Thezentree we need more detail. 285 is only the width. Need aspect ratio, rim size, offset to have any idea of what you're working with. I think you're on the right path with top notch in the front and adding an inch in the rear. Should net 1.25" MORE rake than you currently have. If that's too much I'd look into a different block in the rear or having one milled to achieve however much rake you're after. If it were me I'd order just the struts and shocks with those part numbers you posted(seems to be about $357 on shocksurplus with SHOCKD 5% promo code) set it at the top notch, drive it a while, load it, measure it, then decide what(if any) lift you would like in the rear. I can't see it being more than an inch so your rear shocks would be ready. Also with 210,000 miles on factory struts you may stand to benefit with a kyb top hat with bearing and spring seat ($40 per strut on rockauto) since you're swapping those over to the 5100s anyways it would be the time to do it.

Hah sorry, I come from the land of 4Runners where “285s” means either 285/75R16 or the 17” equivalent. I’ve got 285/70R17s on factory wheels. My next set of tires will likely be 255/80R17s but if the 285s fit, the 255s should too. 
 

I think you’re right about holding off on doing anything to the rear (other than shocks). 
 

And good call on new hardware. I’m sure the existing stuff is a little crusty. 

Gtschwifty Enthusiast

Gtschwifty

Posted
Posted

Bilsteins, 255/80r17s, you do come from the land of Toyota. I am curious about that size as well, which tire? Haven't found anyone really running them on this platform 

thezentree Enthusiast

thezentree

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 hour ago, Gtschwifty said:

Bilsteins, 255/80r17s, you do come from the land of Toyota. I am curious about that size as well, which tire? Haven't found anyone really running them on this platform 

#overlandAF haha

 

My Sierra has been relegated to a second vehicle since I got the 4Runner, but eventually I plan to cut up a 1st gen Tacoma as a dedicated trail rig so I don’t ruin the 4Runner or the Sierra. The Sierra is going to be the tow pig for that and won’t see much dirt other than trips to the beach or forest roads, so a skinnier tire is appealing to me from a MPG perspective. Right now I’ve got my eye on a set of Falken AT3Ws in 255/80 since I loved the set I had on the 4Runner. 
 

Gotta get new shocks first so I can get it aligned after it’s (re)leveled. 

Gtschwifty Enthusiast

Gtschwifty

Posted
Posted

Sounds like a plan. Full disclosure I ordered my shocks and struts before I've even taken possession of the truck, picking it up this Friday though. By financial necessity it will be my one and only daily driver. So for now I am thinking I'll try the second circlip ring on the 6112's (back has a mid-height topper and I need rake) along with just "4 ply" 265/70r17 falken at3w because at 600 for a set I am hard pressed to find a better tire. I loved my set on my old F150 and they are excellent for rain and winter, especially being non-LT with the grippy silica compound. Eventually I do want either the p285/70r17 or the LT255/80r17. 

thezentree Enthusiast

thezentree

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Welp, got the springs swapped to the new front shocks, but it's looking like I'm going to have to separate the upper ball joint so the lower control arm can drop far enough to get the bar pin on top of it. That means pulling the CV out of the hub so I can get a puller on the bottom of the ball joint.

 

Anyone run into this before?

thezentree Enthusiast

thezentree

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 hour ago, Gtschwifty said:

How did it go?

It's still on jackstands, but mostly due to me being indecisive.

 

I thought about it more and decided to keep the RC leveling block and drop the spring seat down to the lowest groove. This way I keep the same amount of lift and don't have to add a bunch of preload to the springs and stiffen the ride a bunch.

 

Unfortunately the cheap spring compressor kit I had turned out to be basically disposable, so I'm waiting on an OTC clamshell strut spring compressor to get here to take it all apart again. Also I neglected to order jounce bumpers with the KYB top hats (you'd think they'd be included), and it would bug me forever to not have those installed, so those are on the way too. Thankfully I'm working from home and have the 4Runner to get around in, so I'm not too jammed up.

 

I'll follow up when I get all the parts and have time to take another stab at it.

Gtschwifty Enthusiast

Gtschwifty

Posted
Posted

I still cannot wrap my head around what people mean by preloading the spring. In my mind all you're doing is extending the distance from spring perch to lower control arm exactly the same as a lower spacer. Preloading shock travel and droop if anything. I am not saying I am right, I am looking to be set straight if I am missing something obvious here. The stiffer ride would be due to the arm being farther out of neutral resulting in less force acting perpendicular to the control arm meaning less torque rotating the arm into the dampener and more force sent through the arms into the frame. I cannot get past it being a result of geometry no matter how it's achieved. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,760
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    MASONV88888888
    Newest Member
    MASONV88888888
    Joined

  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 1,654 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Coastie05
      Replacing 2.7L on 2021 Silverado with 2023 2.7L

      By Coastie05 · Posted

      I’m definitely interested to hear the end result here. 
    • MASONV88888888
      Another 6.2L engine failure!

      By MASONV88888888 · Posted

      My 2025 Silverado 1500 had to receive a brand-new engine (long block) under warranty last month at only around 16,500 miles. Before the replacement, the truck repeatedly displayed "Engine Oil Level Low" warnings, even though the Oil Life Monitor still showed around 50% remaining after about 6,000 miles since my last oil change. After seeing the warning several times, I checked the dipstick with the engine cold, and the oil level was completely normal. The next day, the message escalated to "Add Engine Oil." At first, I assumed it was just a faulty oil level sensor, so I brought the truck to the dealership. After inspecting the engine, they found internal cylinder wall scoring and ultimately replaced the entire long block under warranty. Before this happened, I was planning to install a 4-inch lift and suspension upgrade on my truck. After needing a new engine at just 16,500 miles, I honestly don't see the point anymore. I also contacted GM to ask whether my vehicle qualified for a buyback, but I was informed that it does not at this time. Anyway, this experience has left me with serious concerns about the long-term reliability of this engine. I sincerely hope NHTSA expands the current investigation or recall to include 2025 model and performs a thorough inspection of affected vehicles. My biggest concern is that these engines may fail shortly after the powertrain warranty expires. If GM truly stands behind this engine, then at the very least, please consider extending the powertrain warranty to 10 years for affected owners. That would go a long way toward restoring customer confidence.
    • Grumpy Bear
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Without exception but then I'm the odd duck, right? I know what goes into that test, how it is calculated and thus how to beat it. But EPA values are often not beaten by the general public and the government has in past years adjusted the means and methods to come to those values to more closely approximate "Joe Average".    The only real trick to beating that EPA average is don't drive like "Joe Average".    It's the same method you used to profit from "Economic Migration" and in doing so beat the 'stats'. But you, like me, are not "Joe Average".     The thing you don't seem to grasp is this "Purchasing Power Index" isn't forward looking. It doesn't predict what it going to be but looks backward and states what it was. They are not telling us what the THINK, they are telling us what they MEASURED. Example:    Wife says "I'm going to lose 40 pounds by Christmas". May she does, maybe she doesn't but the doctors office who weighed her when she made that statement and again at Christmas only REPORTS what the RESULT was. You and I can banter about what was possible and what aunt Tilly did till the cows come home but the result is the result. Arguing otherwise is.....irrational. That's all I'm saying. This isn't about:      What you are calling a 'Statistic' is a RESULT not a CALCUATION and as a result the RULE. Like gravity as a rule, it can not be broken. 
    • MASONV88888888
      Rattle in the rear!

      By MASONV88888888 · Posted

      Just wanted to say thank you for posting this. Years later, your thread is still helping Silverado owners.   I bought my 2025 Silverado 1500 in January 2025, and I've had what feels like the exact same rattle since day one. After reading your findings, I believe my truck has the same issue with the cable carrier contacting the rear sliding window. To be honest, I had pretty much given up on pursuing the issue. It wasn't until I recently drove another brand's pickup that I realized just how quiet their cabin was—and how noisy mine has been all along. On my truck, the rattle happens on almost any paved road, gets even worse on rougher pavement, and I can even hear it during braking and acceleration.   I actually referenced your thread when submitting my case to GM, hoping they'll recognize this as a recurring issue instead of treating it as an isolated incident. The reason I reached out to GM first is because my dealership told me they would need to keep the truck for at least two days just to diagnose the problem. I was concerned that even after two days, they still might not be able to identify the source of the rattle before giving the truck back to me. I had also asked a few dealerships about this issue during previous service visits, but none of them seemed to know what was causing it or had a solution. That's why I decided to contact GM directly first, hoping they might already have an official repair procedure or guidance for this issue.   I also hope GM eventually comes up with an official fix for this problem. I have a feeling there are many Silverado owners experiencing the same rattle, but most either choose to live with it or simply don't know what the cause is.   Really appreciate you taking the time to document your diagnosis. Your post is still making a difference years later.
    • Buckwild27
      Gas Prices

      By Buckwild27 · Posted

      I have 2 choices. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...