Jump to content

Air Intake


Recommended Posts

Posted

I here some talk about the UPD (NSV) Air Intake alot. Is it as good as they say it is? One guy said he dyno'ed 20-23hp with it. Next in line to me would be the AEM Brute Force, because i have seen dynos of 13-16hp. Well, tell me your thoughts

Posted

I guess it's possible, but I"d be surprised if you could gain that much. There are so many new intake manufacturers out there now, making so many ridiculous claims about hp gain, I'm gettin leary or all of them. I only believe it when several people on these forums buy them and verify the hp gains.

Posted

I guess it's possible, but I"d be surprised if you could gain that much. There are so many new intake manufacturers out there now, making so many ridiculous claims about hp gain, I'm gettin leary or all of them. I only believe it when several people on these forums buy them and verify the hp gains.

Posted

go to procold.net and check out there air intakes. they make claims of 28 hp and have dyno sheets to back it up. scroll down on the page and look at the bottom left. 28hp seems like a lot for just an intake :sigh: tell me what you guys think

Posted

The most you can gain from an intake is maybe 15 at the wheels on a 2wd, I doubt it is even this much because the 5.3 doesnt have the airflow requirements of the LS1 because it dont rev as high. Somehwhere around 8-10hp would be a lot more realistic claim. The main problem with the truck intakes is the hard bend that it makes directly off the end of the throttle body. Get someone to do a comparison between a UPD (NSV) or a ProCold, and a stock airbox with the belly cutout and the baffles cut-off with a fram filter in it, I would be willing to bet that the cut up stock box was within 2 hp of the UPD (NSV) and the Pro Cold. Manufacures dyno sheets arent worth $hit, look at SLP's claims of 45 hp headers and 25 hp exhaust.

Posted

I have a 5.3L motor with a supercharger. The supercharger kit came with a K&N air filter. I didn't know whether to install the new filter or keep the oem filter (with about 500 miles on it). So I decided to do my own unscientific test to see if I could identify any advantage for the K&N. I have an autotap scantool that has a feature allowing log files to be recorded for performance purposes. With this tool I made two runs (under full throttle), one with the K&N installed and one with the oem installed. Here are my results (the measurements were taken from the MAF and are shown in lbs/min of air flow):

 

RPM K&N OEM

600 1.1 1.1

1,000 3.0 3.8

1,500 5.0 6.6

2,000 8.9 9.9

2,500 13.3 14.1

3,000 ? 24.0

3,500 29.4 ?

4,000 33.4 ?

4,500 38.3 39.4

5,000 41.9 44.0

5,500 47.0 48.4

 

 

I don't know if this test is valid or not, but it doesn't look to me that there is any advantage to switching to the K&N. I'm beginning to believe what I have read in other posts "the restrictive parts of the air flow system are the throttle body and air intake holes" .

 

Let me know what you guys think. Did I waste my time? Is it an invalid test for some reason? Or, should we spend our hard earned money somewhere else?

Posted

i believe it is preference at most.i went from a k&n fipk to a UPD (NSV) and i have been very staisfied.hell magnacharger has you set up to use the stock air box.i honestly think a good filter--k&n-airaid-is a good investment not just for flow but also to be able to clean it and not have to replace it. also a good filter and a good intake tube are probably the most important. just my 2cents :cheers:

Posted

I was looking at the August mag. of Truckin' where they did a before and after dyno on a 5.3L with the AEM Brute Force. 13HP

I decided to go with that. Mainly b/c of the looks. The polished tubing is awesome compared to the UPD (NSV) intake (my opinion). UPD (NSV) reminds me to much of my mothers vacuum cleaner. But, it does deliver some nice numbers too from what i here.

 

Thanks for you alls thoughts....

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted
I was looking at the August mag. of Truckin' where they did a before and after dyno on a 5.3L with the AEM Brute Force. 13HP

I did the AEM Brute Force and was extremely pleased with the results. I instantly noticed a faster reving engine when I barried the pedal. I had an airaid on there before and will never switch back.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.6k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    343,007
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Brendan C
    Newest Member
    Brendan C
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,193 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Thanks for posting, I'm sure it will help someone
    • New to diesel trucks. I happened to find my oil cooler leaking oil externally with only 4,000 miles on the truck. I didn’t realize this was an issue until I started researching it. Dealer is going to replace it under warranty but I’m wondering if there’s anything GM is working on to fix this issue. I’ve heard the oil filter used is the same as they use on their V6 motors and that’s what is causing the problems. Should I switch to a bigger filter or keep using the OEM recommended? 
    • So, GMCustomerService:  Judging by the Update History pictured above, is this truck missing any updates that it actually needs. If it's just for the infotainment system, the radio is working fine and no trouble with SeriusXM. and Android Auto is working fine wirelessly with my phone. Some months ago, an update notice was sent to my truck. I approved the update and it finished saying that the update was successful, but it seems that whatever that update was, it didn't actually get installed - at least not if I'm to go by the Update History shown above.   So, again, are there any updates that this truck really should have? I've checked with my dealer but they're reluctant or commit to anything and if I want them to check, they require a $200.00 fee just to check it out and then I'd have to pay for the actual update(s).    Ignorance is bliss, and if none of the updates goes to fixing any mechanical discrepancies, I'll just leave things as is.  
    • Hey everyone, I recently had an issue with my 07 2500HD GMT900. My DRL’s stay on at all times. Right front turn and right mirror turn signal indicator stay on solid at all times. By “at all times” I mean the only way to make them go off is disconnecting the battery. I tore the headlight assemblies out, tried disconnecting the harnesses to eliminate bad wiring at the harness, I unplugged the headlight switch, no change and the mirror turn signal still stayed on. My first thoughts were : Bad bulb and/or socket somewhere, under hood fuse panel bad, bcm bad, tail light or trailer wiring problem, or some random short to power in the harness.  Possibly a bad ground but unlikely. I had a big clue in the fuse panel, it had a burnt smell. I started pulling every fuse that had to do with DRL or right turn/park lamp. Nothing made the right directional turn off but pulling the DRL2 fuse made the DRL’s go out.  After studying wiring diagrams, I found that both problems had that fuse panel in common, the bcm also controls both problems but knowing the fuse panel had a burnt smell I removed and disassembled the fuse panel and found a little corrosion on the printed circuit board.  I ordered a new fuse panel from Amazon for like $260. When it arrived I installed it, and put everything back together, the problem was fixed. I figured the fuse panel needed to be replaced anyway so that was a logical place to start. Hopefully this story helps someone in the future. Regretfully I didn’t scan for codes before I did everything.
    • That stinks. I’m sitting on the side of the road right now with the same issue. Never had an issue before taking it in for the ground strap recall. Now I’m outside of warranty and they’ll probably want $200 just to diagnose what they already “fixed”. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...