Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

For context, I have a 2016 All Terrain with stamped steel UCA and a Rough Country 2” below strut level. This weekend, I removed the 2” level, added a motofab 2.5” above strut level, new Bilstein 5100 shocks (at lowest setting) and Readylift UCA. 
 

Before my suspension upgrades, my truck measured at 38.5” at front fenders. Now it measures 40.5”. How did I gain 2” when I only added 1/2” of level? I cannot figure it out. 
 

Yes, I’m sure the Bilstein was at the lowest setting. Yes, I removed the lower strut level. Will it settle? Will alignment settle it? 
 

Currently sitting nose high by 1”. I’ve already ordered 2” rear blocks. 
 

Any feedback helps. 

00AE9268-3BE4-4E52-92F6-687F43103B96.jpeg

Posted
17 hours ago, TriZZZl3 said:

For context, I have a 2016 All Terrain with stamped steel UCA and a Rough Country 2” below strut level. This weekend, I removed the 2” level, added a motofab 2.5” above strut level, new Bilstein 5100 shocks (at lowest setting) and Readylift UCA. 
 

Before my suspension upgrades, my truck measured at 38.5” at front fenders. Now it measures 40.5”. How did I gain 2” when I only added 1/2” of level? I cannot figure it out. 
 

Yes, I’m sure the Bilstein was at the lowest setting. Yes, I removed the lower strut level. Will it settle? Will alignment settle it? 
 

Currently sitting nose high by 1”. I’ve already ordered 2” rear blocks. 
 

Any feedback helps. 

00AE9268-3BE4-4E52-92F6-687F43103B96.jpeg

Sorry for the long post

 

As I'm getting a lot older I like to spread my knowledge around. I'm only 70

 

If you install a 2.5" or any other size spacer no matter whether below the shock or above the strut spacer. 

 

The truck will go up more than the size of the spacer due to the geometry of the suspension

 

Also the geometry of the upper arm you replaced with a non-stock one could also play a part in the height. I would contact Readylift and find out if  the arm is different that the stock besides being of a stronger material.

 

On my 2017 Silverado 1500 2WD I had a 1.75" spacer that leveled the truck but not enough so the rear end was a little higher, about 3/4"  higher.  So I bought a 2" billet spacer and installed it truck went up a little less that 3"

 

I know a friend of mine installed a !/2" spacer on the lower arm below the shock and his truck went up 1"

 

Maybe someone here has the formula for the geometry and the height difference.

 

Or you can Google or Bing it.

 

Actually the 3/4 ton trucks have a different geometry, have you noticed when you drive your car in a garage the wheels squeal? it because the engineers put in understeer (move the steering wheel with less turning of the wheels) to the geometry to make it a little harder to spin the car. Most new vehicles have Variable Steering because it makes it harder to turn the steering  wheel at speed and easier to turn at lower speed. In this case they accomplish the same as with mechanical means. 

 

There are books written about car steering geometry, I used to have one when I autocrossed. Go to the SCCA website.

  • Like 1
Posted

I’m aware of this. The 2.5” leveling kit is a 1.66” spacer. I do like your thought on the UCA. That could be a factor. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • How many years have I pointed out every point in that link to the folks here and been avalanched with criticisms and outright hostilities at times? I ran counter to even the great CUSTOMBOSS and Lake Speed Jr and the half dozen experts on YouTube and in the final.....GM, Physics (Stribeck) backs that Grumpy old Bear.    Honestly, I never said a thing engineering hadn't studied silly and laid in concrete during WWII. But I'm old, the information is old and yet, the Laws of Physics are eternal.    Okay there is one exception. I vehemently disagree with their use of the word 'tolerances' when what it meant is "clearance".   The clearance is the distance between two objects. The tolerance is the degree of acceptable variation permitted in that clearance. I.E., piston to bore clearance is 0.004" with a tolerance of +/- .0002" so the clearance is in specification if it lies between 0.0038" and 0.0042". Cutting that 'tolerance in half has ZERO impact on lubrication requirements. Makes for more difficulty in manufacturing.  But a tighter clearance 'MAY'. Depends on finish. Anyway....   It's one of those statements made by people to make themselves look smarter than they are to convince people who are as un-enlighten as they seem to manipulate their behaviors. But hey, the blind leading the blind puts them both in the pit. 
    • Out and about yesterday on a long Saturday drive I passed a lot of Shell stations. My preferred, so I pay attention. Lot's of small town Illinois so not six stations in three blocks like the city.    Everyone of them over a radius of say 100 miles had regular at $4.19 but one which was the one closest to home at $4.15. However Premium pricing varied greatly between 85 cents over regular to $1.50 over. I'm not counting the price of the station with the lowest regular so the reference is the same for the remainder and all within the same brand. However the spread discrepancy holds across all brands.     @txab, any thoughts on that? 
    • What are your thoughts? The Chevy Blazer relaunch was an epic case of 'lunchbag letdown'. Jeep Wranglers and Ford Broncos stick out like a sore thumb.    The AI photos do not look like a 'retro version', but shrunken Tahoes. Get away from the 'futuristic look'. I've seen two concepts. One had rectangular headlight like a Rivian and the other way to big should include dual round headlights like the early version.   If not this would look OK   At least it has GM styling (albeit the K2XX) A lot of the images floating around look like Bronco IIs or the current Bronco. Looking at the Broncos in my area (central Ontario, it seems to be a mix of 2 doors and 4 doors, 'mall rated' to ones that could go offroad.    I'm sure a AT4 and AT4X RPOs could be outfitted similar to a Rubicon if the braintrust understood the whole offroad scene. Crosing my fingers that if it does see the light that the front air dam/bumper doesn't extend below the center line of the tire...      
    • I saw this news earlier this year:   https://theautowire.com/2026/06/12/gm-kills-off-chevys-biggest-silverado-trucks-as-sales-collapse-and-factory-fallout-spreads/
    • And overpriced. I was in the Oshawa Truck Plant when they were being built. Very few. I could count on one hand how many I've seen since  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...