Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

IMG_0180.HEICIMG_0178.HEICIMG_0063.HEIC

So I recently purchased a used 2018 GMC which had a Retrax cover.  Unfortunately, I think there may have been some issues with it in the past and am trying to fix the installation.  I understand some water will get in the bed, but it seems to be more than normal when it rains.  I have had other covers in the past and know that some water will almost always get in.  
 
I have attached several pictures and videos and hopefully you guys can help guide me in what I need to do.  
 
There seems to be a lot of play when the cover is closed and locked on the back right of the cover (non locking side) which makes a gap between the tailgate and cover.  When looking at that rail it seems there is a little indention from the clasp that closes the cover...I am not sure if this is normal and included in one of the pictures.  I did measure and the spacing is 1/8" from rail to tailgate, but since there is play it seems to affect it.  
 
I am also getting water in from the front and sides.  The space between the cover and top of the box seems to be a decent size gap too.  
 
Any advice would greatly be appreciated.  
 
Thanks, 
Posted

My Retrax cover has white plastic set screws on either side of the clamps. I don't see any in your pictures but if there are some, tightening them may reduce the gap between the rails and the main section of the cover and make it seal better. When I installed mine it took quite a bit of messing around with it to get everything lined up and functioning right. maybe try removing the clamps and see if you can get everything positioned better.  

  • Like 2
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

First good luck. I have been sorely disappointed in my Retrax and would not but another one, especially considering the comparative cost. But to your concerns.

 

The indention looks like it could be caused be the little spike that locks the cover to the rail. When closed, there really shouldn't be much play in the top. The bolt in the picture sticking out from the rail hold the cover in the fully closed position.

 

From the pictures and your description, your rail(s) need to be solid toward the tailgate. That should help cost the gap at the tailgate.

 

Now, that gap in the front. I bought a cover late 2017 when I bought my truck. It didn't have a gap there, ever. Ended up getting a warranty replacement for water intrusion through the rubber seals between the slats. Now I have a gap at the front. It appears they changed the length of the cover (warranty replaced cover only, not rails). No clue how to fix. I need to take my cover back off and I intend to put something to cover the hole in the back of the canister. When it rains and I'm driving the front wall of my bed gets completely soaked from wind driving rain through that gap and out the bank of the canister.

 

For water around the edges of the bed. This ticks me off now than anything and should have been solved by rail design, but it's not and I'm not certain there's a good way to keep it working long term. When installing the rails, you actually have to twist the rails up, to secure them at an forward angle. This directs water that gets in the channel where the wheels run to for away from the bed. Don't worry, due to surface tension it'll still hug the cover and drip down some in your bed. You'll really need the white nylon studs mentioned earlier to get this right. They actually updated their instructions at find point; the original printed instructions that came with my cover didn't mention it.

 

Good luck!

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 3,046 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...